Dubbs Kitkats favorite wrote:
ThomasK wrote:
truthhurts wrote:
ThomasK wrote:
truthhurts wrote:
ThomasK wrote:
Premadoll wrote:
ThomasK wrote:
Hey uto, here's a little humor to brighten your day:

Q: What's the difference between a Democrat and a prostitute?
A: The prostitute gives value for the money she takes.

Very funny ThomasK, just goes to prove Republicans always reduce to name calling like a 5 year old when they don't have anything smart to say. Which is pretty much most of the time. Very grown up of you. Give the boy a cookie.

So you do think just like uto. How nice of you. What other 5 year old comments would you like to say about another's faith? I can't wait for another one of your grown up answers.
Freudian slip there, Thomas? I was not aware "Republican" was or is a "faith". I do not see the words Mormon, LDS, or anything like unto it in the comments above.

Of course, this is Utah, so I can see how so many would think they are synonyms for each other.

Like you.

Now it's a three ring circus. You really do have comprehension problems. I was referring to uto's last comments to me:

Go ask your bishop how you should think Tommy.
As long as you continue in the church of Joeseph's Myth we will disagree!

You're taking things out of context. But that's what you do. Pay attention to the line of comments before you stick your nose in.
If it's a "three ring circus" Thomas, it's only because you are a clown.

I was responding to ONE of your posts. If you are in the habit of inferring things in one post that go back several posts, then that is your comphrehension problem, not mine. So, please point out where in the post above that I reponded to that faith or religion were mentioned.

Hint: It isn't . But go ahead and make a fool of yourself anyway.

YOU DIMWIT. That post was part of the previous posts. Why should I have to string them all together so you can figure out what is meant? You butt into the middle of a conversation and think you're some high and mighty know-it-all. Go play with yourself. You can make up whatever you feel like, just like you did here.


Ahh, there's the hypocrite preacher of "let's all act Christlike" Name calling, etc, next thing you know, he'll be in one of the religious threads preaching and deriding me for my name calling. Friggin hypocrite.


I guess in your mind it's ok in a political thread, but when we switch to a religious thread it's not?
Instead of running around the forum looking for people to insult, why don't you simply work on your own behavior? You can't be calling people hypocrites when you are doing exactly what you accuse them of doing. That is the definition of hypocrite, so it does fit you, doesn't it?

And now, instead of answering my question, you'll just come back with an attack.

ThomasK wrote:
http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-clintonchina13apr13,0,499290.story

As Chinese authorities have clamped down on unrest in Tibet and jailed dissidents in advance of the 2008 Olympics, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton has taken a strong public stance, calling for restraint in Tibet and urging President Bush to boycott the Olympics opening ceremonies in Beijing.

But her recent stern comments on China's internal crackdown collide with former President Bill Clinton's fundraising relationship with a Chinese Internet company accused of collaborating with the mainland government's censorship of the Web. Last month, the firm, Alibaba Inc., carried a government-issued "most wanted" posting on its Yahoo China homepage, urging viewers to provide information on Tibetan activists suspected of stirring recent riots.

OH WHAT A TANGLED WEB THEY WEAVE, AGAIN!

Watch Tom Tom,
I can cut and paste only the part of the article I agree with also. Do not see anything in yours about the 2005 date or the money being used for charities? Hmmm typical hyocrite......here is the rest of the story.......

Alibaba, which took over Yahoo's China operation in 2005 as part of a billion-dollar deal with the U.S.-based search engine, arranged for the former president to speak to a conference of Internet executives in Hangzhou in September 2005. Instead of taking his standard speaking fees, which have ranged from $100,000 to $400,000, Clinton accepted an unspecified private donation from Alibaba to his international charity, the William J. Clinton Foundation.

The former president's charity has raised more than $500 million over the last decade and has been lauded for its roles in disaster response, AIDS prevention and Third World medical and poverty relief.

Foreign contributions to American-based charities are allowed under U.S. law.

Fueled by such cash, the foundation has grown into a worldwide philanthropic dynamo, using its financial clout and influence with business leaders to streamline solutions for logistical logjams that have long plagued charity operations. The foundation has pressed to lower the price of expensive AIDS medications and set up long-term projects across the Third World.

utocoman wrote:
ThomasK wrote:
http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-clintonchina13apr13,0,499290.story

As Chinese authorities have clamped down on unrest in Tibet and jailed dissidents in advance of the 2008 Olympics, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton has taken a strong public stance, calling for restraint in Tibet and urging President Bush to boycott the Olympics opening ceremonies in Beijing.

But her recent stern comments on China's internal crackdown collide with former President Bill Clinton's fundraising relationship with a Chinese Internet company accused of collaborating with the mainland government's censorship of the Web. Last month, the firm, Alibaba Inc., carried a government-issued "most wanted" posting on its Yahoo China homepage, urging viewers to provide information on Tibetan activists suspected of stirring recent riots.

OH WHAT A TANGLED WEB THEY WEAVE, AGAIN!

Watch Tom Tom,
I can cut and paste only the part of the article I agree with also. Do not see anything in yours about the 2005 date or the money being used for charities? Hmmm typical hyocrite......here is the rest of the story.......

Alibaba, which took over Yahoo's China operation in 2005 as part of a billion-dollar deal with the U.S.-based search engine, arranged for the former president to speak to a conference of Internet executives in Hangzhou in September 2005. Instead of taking his standard speaking fees, which have ranged from $100,000 to $400,000, Clinton accepted an unspecified private donation from Alibaba to his international charity, the William J. Clinton Foundation.

The former president's charity has raised more than $500 million over the last decade and has been lauded for its roles in disaster response, AIDS prevention and Third World medical and poverty relief.

Foreign contributions to American-based charities are allowed under U.S. law.

Fueled by such cash, the foundation has grown into a worldwide philanthropic dynamo, using its financial clout and influence with business leaders to streamline solutions for logistical logjams that have long plagued charity operations. The foundation has pressed to lower the price of expensive AIDS medications and set up long-term projects across the Third World.

Hi uto, how's your day. There's another important point in this article. Go back and read it. These so-called foundations he has going do not allow for outside varification of their finances. Could it be because those "administration costs" are through the roof? $20 is given, $15 goes to administration costs and $5 go towards the needy. Same old, same old scam. Keep writing those checks!

Dubbs Kitkats favorite wrote:
ThomasK wrote:
truthhurts wrote:
ThomasK wrote:
truthhurts wrote:
ThomasK wrote:
Premadoll wrote:
ThomasK wrote:
Hey uto, here's a little humor to brighten your day:

Q: What's the difference between a Democrat and a prostitute?
A: The prostitute gives value for the money she takes.

Very funny ThomasK, just goes to prove Republicans always reduce to name calling like a 5 year old when they don't have anything smart to say. Which is pretty much most of the time. Very grown up of you. Give the boy a cookie.

So you do think just like uto. How nice of you. What other 5 year old comments would you like to say about another's faith? I can't wait for another one of your grown up answers.
Freudian slip there, Thomas? I was not aware "Republican" was or is a "faith". I do not see the words Mormon, LDS, or anything like unto it in the comments above.

Of course, this is Utah, so I can see how so many would think they are synonyms for each other.

Like you.

Now it's a three ring circus. You really do have comprehension problems. I was referring to uto's last comments to me:

Go ask your bishop how you should think Tommy.
As long as you continue in the church of Joeseph's Myth we will disagree!

You're taking things out of context. But that's what you do. Pay attention to the line of comments before you stick your nose in.
If it's a "three ring circus" Thomas, it's only because you are a clown.

I was responding to ONE of your posts. If you are in the habit of inferring things in one post that go back several posts, then that is your comphrehension problem, not mine. So, please point out where in the post above that I reponded to that faith or religion were mentioned.

Hint: It isn't . But go ahead and make a fool of yourself anyway.

YOU DIMWIT. That post was part of the previous posts. Why should I have to string them all together so you can figure out what is meant? You butt into the middle of a conversation and think you're some high and mighty know-it-all. Go play with yourself. You can make up whatever you feel like, just like you did here.


Ahh, there's the hypocrite preacher of "let's all act Christlike" Name calling, etc, next thing you know, he'll be in one of the religious threads preaching and deriding me for my name calling. Friggin hypocrite.


I guess in your mind it's ok in a political thread, but when we switch to a religious thread it's not?

Well I could say that Truth is acting like you, but that would definitely be very un-you-know-who like. He's not THAT bad.

ThomasK wrote:
utocoman wrote:
ThomasK wrote:
http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-clintonchina13apr13,0,499290.story

As Chinese authorities have clamped down on unrest in Tibet and jailed dissidents in advance of the 2008 Olympics, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton has taken a strong public stance, calling for restraint in Tibet and urging President Bush to boycott the Olympics opening ceremonies in Beijing.

But her recent stern comments on China's internal crackdown collide with former President Bill Clinton's fundraising relationship with a Chinese Internet company accused of collaborating with the mainland government's censorship of the Web. Last month, the firm, Alibaba Inc., carried a government-issued "most wanted" posting on its Yahoo China homepage, urging viewers to provide information on Tibetan activists suspected of stirring recent riots.

OH WHAT A TANGLED WEB THEY WEAVE, AGAIN!

Watch Tom Tom,
I can cut and paste only the part of the article I agree with also. Do not see anything in yours about the 2005 date or the money being used for charities? Hmmm typical hyocrite......here is the rest of the story.......

Alibaba, which took over Yahoo's China operation in 2005 as part of a billion-dollar deal with the U.S.-based search engine, arranged for the former president to speak to a conference of Internet executives in Hangzhou in September 2005. Instead of taking his standard speaking fees, which have ranged from $100,000 to $400,000, Clinton accepted an unspecified private donation from Alibaba to his international charity, the William J. Clinton Foundation.

The former president's charity has raised more than $500 million over the last decade and has been lauded for its roles in disaster response, AIDS prevention and Third World medical and poverty relief.

Foreign contributions to American-based charities are allowed under U.S. law.

Fueled by such cash, the foundation has grown into a worldwide philanthropic dynamo, using its financial clout and influence with business leaders to streamline solutions for logistical logjams that have long plagued charity operations. The foundation has pressed to lower the price of expensive AIDS medications and set up long-term projects across the Third World.

Hi uto, how's your day. There's another important point in this article. Go back and read it. These so-called foundations he has going do not allow for outside varification of their finances. Could it be because those "administration costs" are through the roof? $20 is given, $15 goes to administration costs and $5 go towards the needy. Same old, same old scam. Keep writing those checks!

You know its typical. At least the Clinton Foundation is HELPING these people not hurting them. Without them how many children would be dead or dying of preventable diseases. But I guess that doesn't matter to you Thomas. $5.00 to these children and people is ALOT! What is your problem???? Do you even have a heart in that shallow body of yours? DO you have a heart for people who try to help others or people who need help? Sorry, not everyone is well off and there are people in the US and all over the world that can live a life because of the Clinton Foundations help.Get past your political beliefs and open your eyes to the good things this foundation has done. The Clinton Foundation has done NOTHING BUT GOOD! Stop and think about what they have done to HELP others and stop looking at what they haven't done for you!!! Life is not all about I, me, mine.

Christine
"A little HOPE and GIVING goes a long way!"

What!! No comments? Hmm I guess it sunk in then didn't it