Re: Big 'ifs' (1 viewing) (1) Guests
Favoured: 0
|
|
|
TOPIC: Re: Big 'ifs'
|
|
|
|
Big 'ifs' 8 Months, 1 Week ago
|
Karma: 0
|
When the NEA came out against school vouchers, I considered voting for it because I didn't like their involvement. I don't agree with most of the arguments against this referendum. However, I have considered this issue very carefully. I have finally decided to vote against it. Read more... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
|
|
|
Re: Big 'ifs' 8 Months, 1 Week ago
|
Karma: 0
|
|
When the NEA came out in favor of reading, I decided not to allow my children to learn to read because everybody knows the NEA is an evil, corrupt, communist organization.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
|
|
|
Re: Big 'ifs' 8 Months, 1 Week ago
|
Karma: 0
|
|
RangerGordon wrote:
When the NEA came out in favor of reading, I decided not to allow my children to learn to read because everybody knows the NEA is an evil, corrupt, communist organization.
Excellent! That sounds like PCE all the way!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
|
|
|
Re: Big 'ifs' 8 Months, 1 Week ago
|
Karma: 0
|
Chuck E. Racer wrote:
RangerGordon wrote:
When the NEA came out in favor of reading, I decided not to allow my children to learn to read because everybody knows the NEA is an evil, corrupt, communist organization.
Excellent! That sounds like PCE all the way!
Referendum 1 is about power. Allowing the NEA to keep its monopoly is allowing it to override parental concerns and promote its own agenda. It is a good idea to be skeptical whenever the NEA is asking to keep or increase its power. What is the NEA's agenda? After reading this, you just might decide to empower parents and vote for Referendum 1: http://theeducationrevolution.blogspot.com/2007/10/referendum-1-is-about-power.html
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
|
|
|
Re: Big 'ifs' 8 Months, 1 Week ago
|
Karma: 0
|
Joshua wrote:
Chuck E. Racer wrote:
RangerGordon wrote:
When the NEA came out in favor of reading, I decided not to allow my children to learn to read because everybody knows the NEA is an evil, corrupt, communist organization.
Excellent! That sounds like PCE all the way!
Referendum 1 is about power. Allowing the NEA to keep its monopoly is allowing it to override parental concerns and promote its own agenda. It is a good idea to be skeptical whenever the NEA is asking to keep or increase its power. What is the NEA's agenda? After reading this, you just might decide to empower parents and vote for Referendum 1:
http://theeducationrevolution.blogspot.com/2007/10/referendum-1-is-about-power.html
Once again, interesting! NEA doesn't have any monopoly. They do not control the schools. They protect teachers from fads and witch hunts. Most everything the critics are most upset about have come from politicians, court rulings, parents who won't discipline their own children, the entitlement society in general, and very often from the critics themselves. But it's all NEA's fault.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
belindar (User)
Senior Boarder
Posts: 63
|
|
Re: Big 'ifs' 8 Months, 1 Week ago
|
Karma: 0
|
|
I am reminded of a thought that goes something like this: "Don't be the first to jump onto a moving train to and unknown destination and don't be the last to jump off".
I say let's wait until other states try this private school funding experiment out, then learn from them what works and what doesn't. Compared to other states' more immediate need for a change, we can wait awhile and profit from an established pattern for success.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
|
|
|
|
Generated in 0.52888 Seconds |
