GrackMarginal wrote:
Roland Kayser wrote:
The Herald really shouldn't hire illiterate hillbillies to write science editorials. Are there some serious scientists who doubt that humans are causing global warming? Absolutely, but the overwhelming majority of scientists who have studied it beleive that humans are the primary cause of the current warming cycle.
How do you answer the following criticisms?
http://www.michaelcrichton.com/speech-ourenvironmentalfuture.html
http://www.michaelcrichton.com/speech-alienscauseglobalwarming.html
How do you answer this?
NASA's Goddard Institute of Space Studies (GISS):
http://www.giss.nasa.gov/edu/gwdebate/ National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA):
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/globalwarming.html Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC):
http://www.grida.no/climate/ipcc_tar/wg1/index.htm National Academy of Sciences (NAS):
http://books.nap.edu/collections/global_warming/index.html State of the Canadian Cryosphere (SOCC) -
http://www.socc.ca/permafrost/permafrost_future_e.cfm Environmental Protection Agency (EPA):
http://epa.gov/climatechange/index.html The Royal Society of the UK (RS) -
http://www.royalsoc.ac.uk/page.asp?id=3135 American Geophysical Union (AGU):
http://www.agu.org/sci_soc/policy/climate_change_position.html American Meteorological Society (AMS):
http://www.ametsoc.org/policy/climatechangeresearch_2003.html American Institute of Physics (AIP):
http://www.aip.org/gov/policy12.html National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR):
http://eo.ucar.edu/basics/cc_1.html American Meteorological Society (AMS):
http://www.ametsoc.org/policy/jointacademies.html Canadian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society (CMOS):
http://www.cmos.ca/climatechangepole.html --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
