gopherus wrote:

Decaf wrote:

notalawyer wrote:

How is promiscuity relevant to same-sex marriage?

Anyone?


There isn't much relevance. But "abominable", is highly relevant to "same-sex marriage".


and to certain snow men.


But mostly to carbon-based homosexuals, unless you're a lunatic like gopherus, who believes in gay snowmen.

Dizneyfreek wrote:

notalawyer wrote:

How is promiscuity relevant to same-sex marriage?

Anyone?


If same sex couple are sticking to only one person, I don't see how it promiscuity. However, if couple are switching partners, that's a different matter. (Am I agreeing with notalawyer - oh no, the sky's falling!)

This doesn't mean that I think this lifestyle is correct. (Opps, we don't agree again.)


Well, at least you came back in a good mood . . .

Decaf wrote:

notalawyer wrote:

How is promiscuity relevant to same-sex marriage?

Anyone?


There isn't much relevance. But "abominable", is highly relevant to "same-sex marriage".


Do you feel that anything you consider "abominable" should be against the law, even if it cannot be shown to be detrimental to society?

Dizneyfreek wrote:

gopherus wrote:

BishopRick wrote:

gopherus wrote:

Decaf wrote:

notalawyer wrote:

How is promiscuity relevant to same-sex marriage?

Anyone?


There isn't much relevance. But "abominable", is highly relevant to "same-sex marriage".


and to certain snow men.


Touche! (although I think the snow man is much more applicable)



To some people practicaly everything is an abomination. I know I am and I'm certain you are BR. The word has really lost all meaning.




He's cute!


He's abominable!

Dizneyfreek wrote:

notalawyer wrote:

How is promiscuity relevant to same-sex marriage?

Anyone?


If same sex couple are sticking to only one person, I don't see how it promiscuity. However, if couple are switching partners, that's a different matter. (Am I agreeing with notalawyer - oh no, the sky's falling!)

So that leads me to my next question. How would same-sex marriage, which would promote fidelity and monogamy within the gay community, be harmful to society? If it isn't, then why should it be illegal?

This doesn't mean that I think this lifestyle is correct. (Opps, we don't agree again.)

I've never said that it is "correct", either. In fact, it isn't "correct" . . . for me. But for others it most certainly is. If it cannot be shown to be detrimental to society, and in fact, may even turn out to be positive for society, why should same-sex marriage be banned?

Decaf wrote:

gopherus wrote:

Decaf wrote:

notalawyer wrote:

How is promiscuity relevant to same-sex marriage?

Anyone?


There isn't much relevance. But "abominable", is highly relevant to "same-sex marriage".


and to certain snow men.


But mostly to carbon-based homosexuals, unless you're a lunatic like gopherus, who believes in gay snowmen.


So that's what the snowman reference was.