wrz wrote:

Wren wrote:

gopherus wrote:

wrz wrote:

gopherus wrote:


While in Indonesia, as a child, Obama attended a public school, not a Madrassa, prior to transferring to a Catholic school. http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=2822061
Did Sean and Rush forget to mention that?

I'm happy for him if he attended a public school. He also attended a Madrassas according to reports. The fact that he either denies attending or refuses (neglects) to explain (fully), speaks volumes to me. Maybe not to you. We I need to know everything to the nth degree about someone who would be President of the United States. Your disdain for Bush 43 should have taught you that much. Maybe not. The fact that he favors mass immigration of illegals is enough for me not to have voted for him. But who knew?

Islam does not let anyone "leave" the religion. If they attempt it, they are subject to disciplinary action including death. Having said that, I doubt the Muslims would kill a Muslim US president as he would be an asset to the cause.

The real issue here is that you believe false reports produced by those who have an interest in tearing down a charismatic Democrat rather than the reports that debunk them. I would suggest you find your news from less biased sources. I didn't vote for Bush, I had enough information to predict many of the poor decisions he has made.

The Prez's own Chief of Staff told him that the invasion and subjugation and conversion of Iraq wouldn't work several months before the invasion.

And he read it in a crystal ball.

This one single fact will tarnish Bush, Cheney, Powell, Rice, and the neo-cons in Congress and in the country forever.

And the Dems in Congress who voted for the war will shine as bright as a new penny?

I think I can see now how your mind works.

The neo-cons will not come back to power in our lifetimes.

You must be gasping for your last breath on your deathbed. The opinion poll rating of the Dem controlled Congress is far below that of the Prez's. Same with Pelosi and Reid.


False derivative analogy, WRZ. Now if the Dems don't purge some of the far left loonies, the Party could be a minority again for a long, long time. That is exactly the problem the neo-cons give the GOP. Get rid of them, or remain in the minority for a long, long time -- like forever.

wrz wrote:

gopherus wrote:

wrz wrote:

gopherus wrote:


While in Indonesia, as a child, Obama attended a public school, not a Madrassa, prior to transferring to a Catholic school. http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=2822061
Did Sean and Rush forget to mention that?

I'm happy for him if he attended a public school. He also attended a Madrassas according to reports. The fact that he either denies attending or refuses (neglects) to explain (fully), speaks volumes to me. Maybe not to you. We I need to know everything to the nth degree about someone who would be President of the United States. Your disdain for Bush 43 should have taught you that much. Maybe not. The fact that he favors mass immigration of illegals is enough for me not to have voted for him. But who knew?

Islam does not let anyone "leave" the religion. If they attempt it, they are subject to disciplinary action including death. Having said that, I doubt the Muslims would kill a Muslim US president as he would be an asset to the cause.

The real issue here is that you believe false reports produced by those who have an interest in tearing down a charismatic Democrat rather than the reports that debunk them.

I've heard little or no reports from the horse's mouth, the candidate.

I would suggest you find your news from less biased sources.

Like what? The New York Times and Dan Rather?

I didn't vote for Bush, I had enough information to predict many of the poor decisions he has made.


List one.


How many candidates respond directly to obviously false statements from political pundits?

Most reputable papers are moderate in politics and provide generally accurate information. The same could be said for Rather for most of his career. You should always ensure that multiple, independent sources are providing the same story when it reads like an attack.

Clean skies. Forest Conservation Act. Alito. Faith based initiatives. Support of flag-burning amendment and amendment banning gay marriage.

gopherus wrote:

wrz wrote:

gopherus wrote:

wrz wrote:

gopherus wrote:


While in Indonesia, as a child, Obama attended a public school, not a Madrassa, prior to transferring to a Catholic school. http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=2822061
Did Sean and Rush forget to mention that?

I'm happy for him if he attended a public school. He also attended a Madrassas according to reports. The fact that he either denies attending or refuses (neglects) to explain (fully), speaks volumes to me. Maybe not to you. We I need to know everything to the nth degree about someone who would be President of the United States. Your disdain for Bush 43 should have taught you that much. Maybe not. The fact that he favors mass immigration of illegals is enough for me not to have voted for him. But who knew?

Islam does not let anyone "leave" the religion. If they attempt it, they are subject to disciplinary action including death. Having said that, I doubt the Muslims would kill a Muslim US president as he would be an asset to the cause.

The real issue here is that you believe false reports produced by those who have an interest in tearing down a charismatic Democrat rather than the reports that debunk them.

I've heard little or no reports from the horse's mouth, the candidate.

I would suggest you find your news from less biased sources.

Like what? The New York Times and Dan Rather?

I didn't vote for Bush, I had enough information to predict many of the poor decisions he has made.


List one.


How many candidates respond directly to obviously false statements from political pundits?

Most reputable papers are moderate in politics and provide generally accurate information. The same could be said for Rather for most of his career. You should always ensure that multiple, independent sources are providing the same story when it reads like an attack.

Clean skies. Forest Conservation Act. Alito. Faith based initiatives. Support of flag-burning amendment and amendment banning gay marriage.
My example of why GW would be a poor president was when I read about his thrice failed oil exploration attempts. With daddy's money and then later Saudi money little george played oil man in the most oil rich county in Texas. Of course, this gray matter challenged wanna be couldn't find a drop of oil and bankrupted three companies while providing a golden parachute each time for himself.

These ill gotten gains then provided a way for GW to buy into the Texas Rangers baseball team for a few million bucks. Well guess what: The Rangers pressure the city of Arlington to build them a state of the art stadium at a cost to the taxpayers in the hundreds of millions. GW then promptly sold his share for a tidy little windfall.

Nice work if you can get it. Or if you have family ties.

That information alone was enough to convince me that this guy was not only a dufuss but a con artist.

gopherus wrote:

wrz wrote:

gopherus wrote:

wrz wrote:

gopherus wrote:


While in Indonesia, as a child, Obama attended a public school, not a Madrassa, prior to transferring to a Catholic school. http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=2822061
Did Sean and Rush forget to mention that?

I'm happy for him if he attended a public school. He also attended a Madrassas according to reports. The fact that he either denies attending or refuses (neglects) to explain (fully), speaks volumes to me. Maybe not to you. We I need to know everything to the nth degree about someone who would be President of the United States. Your disdain for Bush 43 should have taught you that much. Maybe not. The fact that he favors mass immigration of illegals is enough for me not to have voted for him. But who knew?

Islam does not let anyone "leave" the religion. If they attempt it, they are subject to disciplinary action including death. Having said that, I doubt the Muslims would kill a Muslim US president as he would be an asset to the cause.

The real issue here is that you believe false reports produced by those who have an interest in tearing down a charismatic Democrat rather than the reports that debunk them.

I've heard little or no reports from the horse's mouth, the candidate.

I would suggest you find your news from less biased sources.

Like what? The New York Times and Dan Rather?

I didn't vote for Bush, I had enough information to predict many of the poor decisions he has made.


List one.

How many candidates respond directly to obviously false statements from political pundits?

Most reputable papers are moderate in politics and provide generally accurate information. The same could be said for Rather for most of his career. You should always ensure that multiple, independent sources are providing the same story when it reads like an attack.

Clean skies. Forest Conservation Act. Alito. Faith based initiatives. Support of flag-burning amendment and amendment banning gay marriage.

Must have been a large crystal ball. Did you swipe it from a dance hall?

HDnotmetric wrote:


My example of why GW would be a poor president was when I read about his thrice failed oil exploration attempts. With daddy's money and then later Saudi money little george played oil man in the most oil rich county in Texas. Of course, this gray matter challenged wanna be couldn't find a drop of oil and bankrupted three companies while providing a golden parachute each time for himself.

These ill gotten gains then provided a way for GW to buy into the Texas Rangers baseball team for a few million bucks. Well guess what: The Rangers pressure the city of Arlington to build them a state of the art stadium at a cost to the taxpayers in the hundreds of millions. GW then promptly sold his share for a tidy little windfall.

Nice work if you can get it. Or if you have family ties.

That information alone was enough to convince me that this guy was not only a dufuss but a con artist.


Check your crystal ball and tell us about Hillary and Osama Obama.

wrz wrote:

gopherus wrote:

wrz wrote:

gopherus wrote:

wrz wrote:

gopherus wrote:


While in Indonesia, as a child, Obama attended a public school, not a Madrassa, prior to transferring to a Catholic school. http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=2822061
Did Sean and Rush forget to mention that?

I'm happy for him if he attended a public school. He also attended a Madrassas according to reports. The fact that he either denies attending or refuses (neglects) to explain (fully), speaks volumes to me. Maybe not to you. We I need to know everything to the nth degree about someone who would be President of the United States. Your disdain for Bush 43 should have taught you that much. Maybe not. The fact that he favors mass immigration of illegals is enough for me not to have voted for him. But who knew?

Islam does not let anyone "leave" the religion. If they attempt it, they are subject to disciplinary action including death. Having said that, I doubt the Muslims would kill a Muslim US president as he would be an asset to the cause.

The real issue here is that you believe false reports produced by those who have an interest in tearing down a charismatic Democrat rather than the reports that debunk them.

I've heard little or no reports from the horse's mouth, the candidate.

I would suggest you find your news from less biased sources.

Like what? The New York Times and Dan Rather?

I didn't vote for Bush, I had enough information to predict many of the poor decisions he has made.


List one.

How many candidates respond directly to obviously false statements from political pundits?

Most reputable papers are moderate in politics and provide generally accurate information. The same could be said for Rather for most of his career. You should always ensure that multiple, independent sources are providing the same story when it reads like an attack.

Clean skies. Forest Conservation Act. Alito. Faith based initiatives. Support of flag-burning amendment and amendment banning gay marriage.

Must have been a large crystal ball. Did you swipe it from a dance hall?


No, I use one of the sequins from your leisure suit.