!!1 wrote:
dadofone wrote:
KitKat wrote:
dadofone wrote:
Hmmmm . . . that's funny.? I mention smiting and all of a sudden I get two more, almost simultaneously.? Could it be that "Russ" and "WatchDog" are the same person?? I don't know but it's quite curious.? Russ' last activity on the site is Today at 06:40:10 PM and WatchDog's is Today at 06:40:53 PM.
Very interesting . . .
I just gave you an applaud to offset at least one of those smites.? I guess smites are the only way some people feel they can get back at you.?
For what it's worth, I have been reading your comments on taxation.? Good posts!
That's sweet of you KitKat.? But like I said, I don't care too much about the smites.? I just wish they'd engage my arguments with their words.? So far, I've gotten nothing but irrelevant arguments and personal attacks.
Dad,
I presume that you actually believe that you don't engage in personal attacks. Got news for ya. You are wrong, at least on that score. It's a pure joy to have you around. Another reincarnation of Russ, eh?
I didn't say I didn't engage in personal attacks. But I said nothing until I was attacked first. Am I not to defend myself?
I am just as sure as you are that WD knows the difference between an auditor and an assessor. It was Russ that made that mistake. I let it go until WD
repeated it. Hmmmm . . .
another curiosity.
I guess that was not a personal attack though, right? And that crack about the entire real estate appraisal business? Where did that come from? Not a personal attack? Give us a break, will ya? The crack about the real estate appraisal business? I didn't make a crack. I defended the appraisal business. Russ is the one that thinks they're all just "guessing".
Hint: Honesty is the best policy, BS won't cut it.That's why I'm calling Russ on
his BS, duh. He spreads dishonest information about how property taxes are determined and uses that faulty information to push an agenda. Are you going to let that BS stand?
They have a right to express their opinion, just as you have. Did I ever say they didn't? I love this argument from fools. All I need to say is you are welcome to your own opinions but not your own facts. Russ is spreading incorrect information. What happens when I try to post a rebuttal correcting him?
I get attacked and deluged with non sequiturs. NICE!
I must wonder just what axe you have to grind in this discussion. There must be one somewhere for you to so adamately protect your "personal opinion". The only axe I have to grind is the one that furthers the truth.
By the way, I beleive that California does just about what Russ suggested. It seems to work for them.I tried to have a discussion about why I don't think it's fair to value property in this way but no one seems to want to talk about that point.
FWIW, I don't care how taxes are figured, as long as it is done fairly. Excellent! Do
you think it's fair to value property based on its last selling price? If so, please refer back to my original real-world example and tell me why that would be fair and/or equitable.
You might try and understand that others have a right to their opinion, even if they disagee with you, God forbid.Already answered.
Also, I don't care about smites either, so smite away if that turns your crank. One other thing, I won't be getting into some lengthy discussion with you, so save your typing finger.Nice of you to drop by . . . chicken.
