Roland Kayser wrote:

Yes, Bush did something in response to 9/11. He did the exact thing Osama Bin Laden wanted him to do. We are in much worse shape because of his decision. It would compare to FDR invading Brazil in response to Pearl Harbor.


Lib Sucker! (all-day variety of course)

american_patriot wrote:

dailyherald wrote:

I would like to say to the anti-war people: If they can find a better flag to fly, then move out of our country and quit trying to tear it down.At least President Bush did something about 9/11. When Clinton was president before him, he did nothing when terrorists tried to blow down the twin towers in the basement in 1992, when 39 marines lost their lives, when the navy ship was bombed in the Far East and

Read more...



Most of us critics of Bush are not anti-war, we are just against illegal and unconstitutional "war." Such as the mess we are in over in Iraq. There was not "real" declaration of war, just a resolution to use force by congress. In case you didn't know a resolution is meaningless, an unbinding piece of garbage saying we don't care what you do. We are not tearing down this country. That is being handled by our government.
when Clinton was in office, he had way more important things (to him) that he was doing in the oval office to worry about what was going on in the world outside.

As for Bush doing something about 9-11, he sure did do something. He invaded a sovereign country (Iraq) that had nothing to do with the attack on us. (That is a proven fact by now.) And he has allowed thousands of our soldiers to die, and has allowed our military to kill countless tens (if not hundreds) of thousands of Iraqi citizens.
That is the measure of the Man in the white house now. A warmonger, and a traitor to say the least. You can support him all you want, living in your make believe world where all is well in the US because the economy is (supposedly) good. You are just living in denial of what is really happening. I would feel sorry for you, but I have heard and had enough of people like you to be able to do so any longer.


"way more important"......CIGAR PERCH MAYBE! (did I mention the small issue of impeachment and disbarment?) Koolaider!

gaystaterefugee wrote:

Roland Kayser wrote:

Yes, Bush did something in response to 9/11. He did the exact thing Osama Bin Laden wanted him to do. We are in much worse shape because of his decision. It would compare to FDR invading Brazil in response to Pearl Harbor.


Lib Sucker! (all-day variety of course)

Your witty and erudite rebuttal has left me dumbfounded. I will cease posting until I am better able to emulate your soporific solecisms and wry insouciance. You steatopygous slubberdegullion.

Roland Kayser wrote:

gaystaterefugee wrote:

Roland Kayser wrote:

Yes, Bush did something in response to 9/11. He did the exact thing Osama Bin Laden wanted him to do. We are in much worse shape because of his decision. It would compare to FDR invading Brazil in response to Pearl Harbor.


Lib Sucker! (all-day variety of course)

Your witty and erudite rebuttal has left me dumbfounded. I will cease posting until I am better able to emulate your soporific solecisms and wry insouciance. You steatopygous slubberdegullion.

Not bad.
You might be the Rabelais of our time, Roland.
He said, and he might have been referring to mental giants like Gay: "prattling gabblers, lickorous gluttons, freckled bittors, mangy rascals, shite-a-bed scoundrels, drunken roysters, sly knaves, drowsy loiterers, slapsauce fellows, slabberdegullion druggels, lubberly louts, cozening foxes, ruffian rogues, paltry customers, sycophant-varlets, drawlatch hoydens, flouting milksops, jeering companions, staring clowns, forlorn snakes, ninny lobcocks, scurvy sneaksbies, fondling fops, base loons, saucy coxcombs, idle lusks, scoffing braggarts, noddy meacocks, blockish grutnols, doddipol-joltheads, jobbernol goosecaps, foolish loggerheads, flutch calf-lollies, grouthead gnat-snappers, lob-dotterels, gaping changelings, codshead loobies, woodcock slangams, ninny-hammer flycatchers, noddypeak simpletons, turdy gut, shitten shepherds, and other suchlike defamatory epithets."

GSR is a simple example of BY's statements about "shitten puppies."

Simply ignore them, and if they get underfoot, kick them away.

ericmiami wrote:

Roland Kayser wrote:

gaystaterefugee wrote:

Roland Kayser wrote:

Yes, Bush did something in response to 9/11. He did the exact thing Osama Bin Laden wanted him to do. We are in much worse shape because of his decision. It would compare to FDR invading Brazil in response to Pearl Harbor.


Lib Sucker! (all-day variety of course)

Your witty and erudite rebuttal has left me dumbfounded. I will cease posting until I am better able to emulate your soporific solecisms and wry insouciance. You steatopygous slubberdegullion.

Not bad.
You might be the Rabelais of our time, Roland.
He said, and he might have been referring to mental giants like Gay: "prattling gabblers, lickorous gluttons, freckled bittors, mangy rascals, shite-a-bed scoundrels, drunken roysters, sly knaves, drowsy loiterers, slapsauce fellows, slabberdegullion druggels, lubberly louts, cozening foxes, ruffian rogues, paltry customers, sycophant-varlets, drawlatch hoydens, flouting milksops, jeering companions, staring clowns, forlorn snakes, ninny lobcocks, scurvy sneaksbies, fondling fops, base loons, saucy coxcombs, idle lusks, scoffing braggarts, noddy meacocks, blockish grutnols, doddipol-joltheads, jobbernol goosecaps, foolish loggerheads, flutch calf-lollies, grouthead gnat-snappers, lob-dotterels, gaping changelings, codshead loobies, woodcock slangams, ninny-hammer flycatchers, noddypeak simpletons, turdy gut, shitten shepherds, and other suchlike defamatory epithets."

Ahh, Rabelais--thanks.