This thread discusses the Content article:
Richard Dutcher: 'Parting words' on Mormon moviesI've started a film-maker carrer. I'm a colombian. I'll always be a mormon. Those things define me from the core of my being... and those are the things that make my life harder than it should be.
The first time I learned about Richard Dutcher was while serving a mission in Chile, and during a lunch a sister in the church put the God's Army DVD while the meal. It was in that moment that I realized that the cinema was meant to be for a living for me.
Back in home, after reading Dutcher's letter, first I felt betrayed, as he said, for I thought "how can somebody support something if he's not a part of it?", but in a great meaning of the word, I understand him. Cinema is not suppoused to be a brainwashing technique to show life as a perfect-idilic voyage (as some Mormon commercial cimena show), but to show a viewpoint, nothing more, nothing less.
If mormon cinema goes like crap, it's because it's not leading the viewer to anything, ergo, i't doesn't show a interesting viewpoint. Some comedies are pretty good, even here in Colombia, LDS members understand the jokes, but then what? Are those movies depicting the life of a normal mormon or just show the jokes surrounding the mormon culture? Mormon culture implies God, scriptures, temples, challenges, sin, forgiveness, life-changing experiences, even anti-mormon expressions, among other things, and if a LDS movie avoid at least some of those subjects, it's just a waste of time.
In other words, even while inactive, Brother Dutcher is right. Where's the real mormon viewpoint on commercial cinema?