SilentReader wrote:
The Great Pretender is about to be exposed.
You're behind, as ususal RushReader.

Romney is already out of the race.

Now as for your continued rants about Obama, calling rumor and innuendo "known fact" does not make it so. For that you need things like evidence, motive, etc. The kinds of things that convicted Scooter Libby of perjury and obstruction of justice. Your (and the neo-conservative pundits such as Limbaugh, Coutler, O'Reilly, Hannity, etc., not to mention the other nameless internet bloggers you like to quote) declarations that Scooter was innocent did not do him any good, did it? So much for your (and their) records on legal prognostications.

Sweet dreams, RushReader...or should I say sweet delusions?

SilentReader wrote:


The Candidate-without-scrutiny is the "political candidate" in Fitzgerald's inditement against Rezko, the Syrian-born slumlord. And. It's a known fact that Rezko's wife bought the land right next to Obama's house, because, apparently, Obama couldn't afford it. Why do you think it was Rezko's wife who bought the land rather than Rezko, truthhurtsdoesn'tit? And. It's a known fact that Obama gave government subsidies to Rezko's companies and then in return Rezko donated monies to Obama's campaigns. Obama's judgment is extremely questionable, both in his association with Rezko and in his association with his pastor, "Uncle" Jeremiah Wright-is-wrong.

Ah, yes. But Obama has come up in the world real fast hasn't he? And so has his wife. He lived in a condominium before becoming "the Senator" and now he lives in a 1.6 million dollar mansion. Wow! What could Obama, who looks down his nose at Clinton and calls his White grandma a typical white person, know about living in poverty?

Hey, Obama's scrutiny has just begun. Up until now he's been given a free pass by the Liberal media who have made him into a rock star and put him way up there in the clouds on a pedestal.

The halo is about to disappear on the amazing Obama.

Rezko also contributed $6000 to George W. Bush in 2003. What did you have to say about that, SilentReader? (In case you have to think too hard about it, the answer is "nothing." )

Link

Your link doesn't work Roger.

Jaye wrote:
Your link doesn't work Roger.

Go here:

http://www.opensecrets.org/indivs/index.asp

Submit the name "Rezko" and select the election cycles 2008, 2006 and 2004.

That is all I did.

Alright Roger...according to that site, Rezko donated approximately $8,000.00 to George W.Bush.

And he donated approximately 13,000.00 to Obama.

I got curious and rooted around a bit. Here's what I found.

Obama has already divested more than $44,000.00 in Rezco affiliated donations...and plans to donate an additional $40,350 in Rezco affiliated donations to various charities.

This shows a bit of a discrepancy in the site you provided.

Jaye wrote:
Alright Roger...according to that site, Rezko donated approximately $8,000.00 to George W.Bush.

And he donated approximately 13,000.00 to Obama.

I got curious and rooted around a bit. Here's what I found.

Obama has already divested more than $44,000.00 in Rezco affiliated donations...and plans to donate an additional $40,350 in Rezco affiliated donations to various charities.

This shows a bit of a discrepancy in the site you provided.

That search was only direct campaign contributions. I did not take the time to search for soft money since this swift-boat job appears to be a non-story to me. The soft money is probably the "discrepancy."

If you want to go hunting for the soft money trail, I wish you good luck, you're gonna need it. You're getting into the dark underbelly of campaign financing and I, for one, wish it that it wasn't an available means for any candidate. Soft money contributions get really murky as to intent, purpose, and how much control the candidate has over the PAC's actions, if any at all.