Re:RICH LOWRY: Obama's speechflawed at core (1 viewing) (1) Guests
Favoured: 0
|
|
|
TOPIC: Re:RICH LOWRY: Obama's speechflawed at core
|
|
|
|
Re:RICH LOWRY: Obama's speech 6 Months, 2 Weeks ago
|
Karma: 10
|
More statements from RushReader, author of such previous profound statements as: SilentReader wrote:TruthHurts wrote:
SilentReader wrote:
I will advise the President
Presidential advisor, huh?
Yes.and, more recently, SilentReader wrote:McCain will not win. We, the conservatives, won't let him. For if he were to win it would destroy the Republican Party and everything it has stood for over the many years.We try to humor him (oops, her).  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Last Edit: 2008/03/30 17:22 By truthhurts.
|
|
|
Posted from my Blackberry, which John McCain's campaign staff said he helped create. It was actually invented in Canada, but what the heck. They just can't stop lying.
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
|
|
|
Re:RICH LOWRY: Obama's speechflawed at core 6 Months, 2 Weeks ago
|
Karma: -87
|
|
The federal fraud trial for indicted political fixer Tony Rezko starts Monday, March 31, 2008.
The amazing Messianic Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) appears on a 237-name list of possible witnesses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Last Edit: 2008/03/30 17:40 By SilentReader.
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
|
|
|
Re:RICH LOWRY: Obama's speechflawed at core 6 Months, 2 Weeks ago
|
Karma: -87
|
|
Another amazing Obama lack of judgement? Or does it have more sinister implications?
Friday, February 1, 2008
Follow the Money: Obama bagman is sent to jail over $3.5m payment by British tycoon
James Bone and Dominic Kennedy of the UK's Times Online wrote February 1, 2008, that the "undeclared $3.5 million" from "Iraqi-British businessman" Nadhmi Auchi, has "landed Barack Obama’s former fundraiser behind bars.
"The payment, disclosed in court papers, is the first time that Mr Obama’s long-serving bagman Antoin 'Tony' Rezko, a Syrian immigrant to the United States, has been linked to Nadhmi Auchi, the Iraqi-born billionaire who is one of Britain’s richest men. The relationship is a potential embarrassment for Mr Obama, who has made his opposition to the Iraq war a central plank of his campaign."
Although court papers describe Rezko as a "close friend" of Auchi, and they "are involved in a large Chicago land development together," "it is unclear how long the two men have known each other or whether they were linked before the 2003 Iraq war. Neither side would discuss their relationship."
Additionally, Bone and Kennedy reported that the Times has also "discovered state documents in Illinois recording that Fintrade Services, a Panamanian company, lent money" to Rezko in May 2005.
"Fintrade’s directors include Ibtisam Auchi, the name of Mr Auchi’s wife. Mr Auchi’s spokespeople declined to respond to a question about whether he was linked to this business."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
Wren (User)
Platinum Boarder
Posts: 11872
|
|
Re:RICH LOWRY: Obama's speechflawed at core 6 Months, 2 Weeks ago
|
Karma: -8
|
|
No one is bothering to read this nonsense.
I noticed that you left off the liberal nonsense when you got called on it.
It's more fun when you get hysterical.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
|
|
|
Re:RICH LOWRY: Obama's speech 6 Months, 2 Weeks ago
|
Karma: -20
|
SilentReader wrote:Just Reading wrote:
RogerWilco wrote:
SilentReader wrote:
The Keeper wrote:
When you are faking a pose for a camera photo opportunity, at least you can get the phone receiver turned in the right direction
GOD forbid it isn't a 3am phone call for the 82nd Airborne...
Great guffaw. Where did you get that picture? It is a fitting match for my last post. The carnival barker.
The Liberals sure know how to pick 'em.
*sigh* Republicans are quite sophomoric and pathetic. Here's the real photo:
Come on, did you actually, really, think that photo was real?? You're willing to believe anything, aren't you SilentReader?
Keeper: Satire is one thing, stupidity is another entirely, and photos like that fall in the latter category.
I would bet that SilentReader thought the two pictures of Bush on the phone that I put up were real too!!
Ha ha ha ha 
Ha ha ha ha. Thinking they would be real would be a Liberal trait since you have chosen, and put on a pedestal, the naive Candidate-without-scrutiny who sits on shows like The View and spouts utter nonsense. Obama may be deluding you guys but he certainly isn't deluding us with his pastorgate and Rezkogate fiascos.
So far, he's whipped up his rockstar image by appearing to be the uniter whereas behind the scenes he has revered the divisive rhetoric of his pastor Wright-is-wrong. The two faces of Obama reveal a weak and naive person who hides behind a facade of bravado and seeming confidence.Hey StupidReader I have not chosen or put any one up on a pedestal, Azzholes like you like to jump to conclusions before they know any facts, You don't know who I like or who I would vote for or If I'm even going to vote at all, Is far as I'm concerned none of them are worth a sh*t and neither is that C*ck sucker Rush Limpd*ck who you listen too, So keep your Assumption's to yourself.... hows that?? 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
|
|
|
Re:RICH LOWRY: Obama's speechflawed at core 6 Months, 2 Weeks ago
|
Karma: -20
|
SilentReader wrote:utocoman wrote:
Yep. No one says it like Rush.
Is this the same Rush that was convicted for felony prescription fraud and felony possesion of narcotic substances. I think the police need to recheck his office. They might have missed his stash.
Kids, pay attention here, this is yet another reason to just say no to drugs.
Ah, yes. Rush was addicted to prescription drugs that he got for a severe back problem that he had, and he freely admitted it.
In early October 2003 and in the same week as the McNabb controversy, the National Enquirer reported that Limbaugh was being investigated for illegally buying prescription drugs. Other news outlets quickly confirmed the beginnings of an investigation.[32]
Limbaugh has been a vocal critic of drug users as well as an avid supporter of the War on Drugs (see the "On Drug Users" section of Limbaugh's quotations at Wikiquotes, cited at the bottom of this article).
On October 10, 2003, Limbaugh admitted to listeners on his radio show that he had abused prescription painkillers and stated that he would enter inpatient treatment for 30 days, immediately following the broadcast. He did not specifically mention which pain medications he had been abusing. Speaking about his behavior, Limbaugh went on to say:
"I am not making any excuses. You know, over the years, athletes and celebrities have emerged from treatment centers to great fanfare and praise for conquering great demons. They are said to be great role models and examples for others. Well, I am no role model. I refuse to let anyone think I am doing something great here, when there are people you never hear about, who face long odds and never resort to such escapes."
"They are the role models. I am no victim and do not portray myself as such. I take full responsibility for my problem. At the present time the authorities are conducting an investigation, and I have been asked to limit my public comments until this investigation is complete."[33]
Following Limbaugh's admission of drug abuse, his detractors reviewed prior statements by him about drug use as examples of hypocrisy. Several statements were found, in particular, on October 5, 1995:
"There's nothing good about drug use. We know it. It destroys individuals. It destroys families. Drug use destroys societies. Drug use, some might say, is destroying this country. And we have laws against selling drugs, pushing drugs, using drugs, importing drugs. And the laws are good because we know what happens to people in societies and neighborhoods which become consumed by them. And so if people are violating the law by doing drugs, they ought to be accused and they ought to be convicted and they ought to be sent up."
"What this says to me is that too many whites are getting away with drug use, too many whites are getting away with drug sales, too many whites are getting away with trafficking in this stuff. The answer to this disparity is not to start letting people out of jail because we're not putting others in jail who are breaking the law. The answer is to go out and find the ones who are getting away with it, convict them and send them up the river, too."
and on August 8, 2003:
"These tough sentencing laws were instituted for a reason. The American people, including liberals, demanded them. Don't you remember the crack cocaine epidemic? Crack babies and out-of-control murder rates? Liberal judges giving the bad guys slaps on the wrist? Finally we got tough, and the crime rate has been falling ever since, so what's wrong?"
on his TV show on December 9, 1993:
"I'm appalled at people who simply want to look at all this abhorrent behavior and say, "Hey, you know, we can't control it anymore. People are going to do drugs anyway. Let's legalize it." It's a dumb idea. It's a rotten idea, and those who are for it are purely, 100 percent selfish."
Which contradicts what was said on March 12, 1998:
"What is missing in the drug fight is legalization. If we want to go after drugs with the same fervor and intensity with which we go after cigarettes, let's legalize drugs. Legalize the manufacture of drugs. License the Cali cartel. Make them taxpayers, and then sue them. Sue them left and right, and then get control of the price, and generate tax revenue from it. Raise the price sky high, and fund all sorts of other wonderful social programs."
For this last quote, it should be noted that Rush often uses heavy sarcasm to make his point.
An article in the January 12, 2004 issue of Human Events (The National Conservative Weekly) presented its reaction to the media attention of Limbaugh's addiction, calling it a 'Network War' against Limbaugh. It charged network anchors with engaging in exaggerated and inflammatory rhetoric by implying Limbaugh was involved in "drug sales" or "drug gangs." Human Events Online reported in January 2004 a timeline of events in this matter from September through December 2003.
An investigation into "doctor shopping" concluded in the state of Florida under the Palm Beach State Attorney in April 2006. Limbaugh's attorney Roy Black alleged that the chief county prosecutor investigating Limbaugh, an elected Democrat, was politically motivated. The ACLU, an organization often lambasted by Limbaugh, came to his defense, claiming that the district attorney violated Limbaugh's constitutional rights by "fishing" through his private medical records. Assistant State Attorney James L. Martz, on November 9, 2005, stated "I have no idea if Mr. Limbaugh has completed the elements of any offense yet." Then on December 12, 2005, Judge David F. Crow decided to prohibit the State from questioning Limbaugh's physicians about "the medical condition of the patient and any information disclosed to the healthcare practitioner by the patient in the course of the care and treatment of the patient."
Limbaugh has said his addiction to painkillers came as a result of long-term back pain he had been suffering for several years, and a botched surgery that came as a result of that. Limbaugh opposed the prosecutor's efforts to interview his doctors on the basis of patient privacy rights, and has argued that the prosecutor has in fact violated his Fourth Amendment civil rights by illegally seizing his medical records. The Florida courts consistently upheld Limbaugh's right to confidentiality.
http://www.popstarsplus.com/celebrities_rushlimbaugh.htm
Remember Betty Ford? She was addicted to prescription drugs as well and established the Betty Ford Center for the many other Americans who suffer from the same addiction.The Betty Ford Center is just for RICH Drug addicts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Last Edit: 2008/03/31 01:14 By Just Reading.
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
|
|
|
|
Generated in 0.59967 Seconds |
