Jaye wrote:
JLD wrote:
Now about ring ceremonies. . .Itchy Peaches is right. There is nothing in Church policy that says you can't have a simple ring ceremony at the reception. I just spoke to one of my priesthood leaders with many years of service in bishoprics and stake presidencies, and now serving in a bishopric, and he said there is NOTHING prohibiting this as long as marriage vows aren't exchanged again ('til death do us part), which would make a mockery of the temple ceremony

Ahh, OK. That makes more sense to me now, thank you.

Well of COURSE it does. And of COURSE I would know little to nothing about it...having only held the Priesthood for about 45 years now.

Excuse me?

JLD wrote:
Jaye wrote:
JLD wrote:
Now about ring ceremonies. . .Itchy Peaches is right. There is nothing in Church policy that says you can't have a simple ring ceremony at the reception. I just spoke to one of my priesthood leaders with many years of service in bishoprics and stake presidencies, and now serving in a bishopric, and he said there is NOTHING prohibiting this as long as marriage vows aren't exchanged again ('til death do us part), which would make a mockery of the temple ceremony

Ahh, OK. That makes more sense to me now, thank you.

Well of COURSE it does. And of COURSE I would know little to nothing about it...having only held the Priesthood for about 45 years now.

Excuse me?

Certainly.

Sorry JLD...that was more in response to Girl Raised in the South's comment than yours.

Please pardon the retort.

Girl Raised in the South wrote:
Life Rocks wrote:
I wasn't planning to post any more on this subject here, but something came up.

For those who may be wondering, I checked with a woman in a comparative world religion class who is Muslim and asked her, "If you were getting married as a Muslim to another Muslim and wanted to invite a non-Muslim, could they attend your wedding."

To which she replied, "Why yes, of course."

So I've talked to a Jew, a Hindu, a Buddhist and Muslim and all say non-members are permitted to attend their weddings...except for the Mormon Temple wedding.

Hmmmmmm.

Welcome back, LifeRocks. Of course they would invite non-members to their weddings because it is permitted in their religions. Every religion has their own unique qualifications. We're not like everyone else.

The point that he is making is in rebuttal to Dubbs claiming that the religions mentioned above had similar requirements as LDS temple weddings.

Betz wrote:
Girl Raised in the South wrote:
Life Rocks wrote:
I wasn't planning to post any more on this subject here, but something came up.

For those who may be wondering, I checked with a woman in a comparative world religion class who is Muslim and asked her, "If you were getting married as a Muslim to another Muslim and wanted to invite a non-Muslim, could they attend your wedding."

To which she replied, "Why yes, of course."

So I've talked to a Jew, a Hindu, a Buddhist and Muslim and all say non-members are permitted to attend their weddings...except for the Mormon Temple wedding.

Hmmmmmm.

Welcome back, LifeRocks. Of course they would invite non-members to their weddings because it is permitted in their religions. Every religion has their own unique qualifications. We're not like everyone else.

The point that he is making is in rebuttal to Dubbs claiming that the religions mentioned above had similar requirements as LDS temple weddings.

Yes, Dubbs ignoriing that the similarity ended with most being held in buildings. Remember that a pretend-person with a pretend-brain can only pretend-analyze: he can't make sense.

Dubbs wrote:
Just Reading wrote:
Girl Raised in the South wrote:
Life Rocks wrote:
I wasn't planning to post any more on this subject here, but something came up.

For those who may be wondering, I checked with a woman in a comparative world religion class who is Muslim and asked her, "If you were getting married as a Muslim to another Muslim and wanted to invite a non-Muslim, could they attend your wedding."

To which she replied, "Why yes, of course."

So I've talked to a Jew, a Hindu, a Buddhist and Muslim and all say non-members are permitted to attend their weddings...except for the Mormon Temple wedding.

Hmmmmmm.

Welcome back, LifeRocks. Of course they would invite non-members to their weddings because it is permitted in their religions. Every religion has their own unique qualifications. We're not like everyone else.

Isn't that the truth!!!

as soon as you learn about the Mormons special underwear you know they are different "LOL"

http://packham.n4m.org/garment.jpg

Let alone the cloths they wear in the temmple

Unbelievable, you have no respect for me I know big dummmy, but at least have some respect for Jaye and Kitkat's beliefs, Your a peice of scumb white trash dude.

first off, kiss my ass Dubbs

second dumb ass you should take the picture of the temple garments out of your post, talk about a dummy...!!!

Just Reading wrote:
Dubbs wrote:
Just Reading wrote:
Girl Raised in the South wrote:
Life Rocks wrote:
I wasn't planning to post any more on this subject here, but something came up.

For those who may be wondering, I checked with a woman in a comparative world religion class who is Muslim and asked her, "If you were getting married as a Muslim to another Muslim and wanted to invite a non-Muslim, could they attend your wedding."

To which she replied, "Why yes, of course."

So I've talked to a Jew, a Hindu, a Buddhist and Muslim and all say non-members are permitted to attend their weddings...except for the Mormon Temple wedding.

Hmmmmmm.

Welcome back, LifeRocks. Of course they would invite non-members to their weddings because it is permitted in their religions. Every religion has their own unique qualifications. We're not like everyone else.

Isn't that the truth!!!

as soon as you learn about the Mormons special underwear you know they are different "LOL"



Let alone the cloths they wear in the temmple

Unbelievable, you have no respect for me I know big dummmy, but at least have some respect for Jaye and Kitkat's beliefs, Your a peice of scumb white trash dude.

first off, kiss my ass Dubbs

second dumb ass you should take the picture of the temple garments out of your post, talk about a dummy...!!!


You don't even have respect for people you call your friends bigdummy. YOu must be such a loser in real life.

Jaye and Kitkat, and whoever else who's LDS who saw these and said nothing are a bunch of cowards, I reported it and hopefully you are banned for it.


Ever going to answer when you got a bachelors? In between your eight zillion jobs and claims of no school in the past, now you claim you went to USC law school, but are not a lawyer? But a paralegal? So you went to law school to become a paralegal?