Dubbs wrote:
KitKat wrote:
Dubbs wrote:
Girl Raised in the South wrote:
Jaye wrote:
"What the heck could an exchange of vows hurt?" ]

I am insinuating nothing G.R.I.T.S., and I see no mockery in allowing newlyweds to perform a small ring ceremony and exchange of vows for non-member parent's sake.


Elder Cree-L Kofford's words:

4. The Brethren counsel Church members not to perform a marriage ceremony following the temple sealing. Occasionally, you’ll find a young couple who will want to do a mock ceremony “so my mother won’t feel left out.� But that makes a mockery out of your temple sealing.


Thank you for posting that article from Brother Kofford, Jaye. I remember reading it in the Ensign. It was very enjoyable and informative. Brother Kofford said it is a mockery to exchange vows civilly after being sealed. An exchange of rings, with no vows spoken, seems to be OK.

And, come on, Jaye. . .I don't claim to know everything about the gospel. In your posts sometimes, you give the impression that you DO know all, and when questioned (by me of late), you raise your voice in your writings. This reminds me of my dad. . .When we disagreed with him and tried to convey our opinions and feelings, he would get angry, and his voice would get louder and louder, refuting us until he couldn't hear us talking anymore. Then, in essence, he would say "We're done here; I've spoken." An occasional challenge is good. We don't always like them, but they serve a purpose. If anything, Jaye, we will keep each other on our toes. I can tell you don't like to be "shut down" when you have an opinion on the forums. . .neither do I.


That's how I picture Jaye in real life. A tyrant with a pretty bad temper. .
If you only knew how I picture you!

Ask me if I care.

Ask me how accurate you are.
Back up a bit and ask Jaye if he cares what you think of him. I know he doesn't.

I think you're jealous of Jaye and the Wolf because you continually make digs at them. The Wolf has never, ever spoken to you, yet you continually bash her. Shame on you.

I simply don't believe that a man who truly honors his Priesthood would act as you do and say the things you say. You do show your true colors on this forum. We all know that, and so do you.

KitKat wrote:
Dubbs wrote:
KitKat wrote:
Dubbs wrote:
Girl Raised in the South wrote:
Jaye wrote:
"What the heck could an exchange of vows hurt?" ]

I am insinuating nothing G.R.I.T.S., and I see no mockery in allowing newlyweds to perform a small ring ceremony and exchange of vows for non-member parent's sake.


Elder Cree-L Kofford's words:

4. The Brethren counsel Church members not to perform a marriage ceremony following the temple sealing. Occasionally, you’ll find a young couple who will want to do a mock ceremony “so my mother won’t feel left out.� But that makes a mockery out of your temple sealing.


Thank you for posting that article from Brother Kofford, Jaye. I remember reading it in the Ensign. It was very enjoyable and informative. Brother Kofford said it is a mockery to exchange vows civilly after being sealed. An exchange of rings, with no vows spoken, seems to be OK.

And, come on, Jaye. . .I don't claim to know everything about the gospel. In your posts sometimes, you give the impression that you DO know all, and when questioned (by me of late), you raise your voice in your writings. This reminds me of my dad. . .When we disagreed with him and tried to convey our opinions and feelings, he would get angry, and his voice would get louder and louder, refuting us until he couldn't hear us talking anymore. Then, in essence, he would say "We're done here; I've spoken." An occasional challenge is good. We don't always like them, but they serve a purpose. If anything, Jaye, we will keep each other on our toes. I can tell you don't like to be "shut down" when you have an opinion on the forums. . .neither do I.


That's how I picture Jaye in real life. A tyrant with a pretty bad temper. .
If you only knew how I picture you!

Ask me if I care.

Ask me how accurate you are.
Back up a bit and ask Jaye if he cares what you think of him. I know he doesn't.

I think you're jealous of Jaye and the Wolf because you continually make digs at them. The Wolf has never, ever spoken to you, yet you continually bash her. Shame on you.

I simply don't believe that a man who truly honors his Priesthood would act as you do and say the things you say. You do show your true colors on this forum. We all know that, and so do you.


You don't even know them Kitkat, stop acting as if you do, it's comical to see you stick up for strangers you've never met, who could be completly full of BS. And think about my points I made, seem odd for a guy who says he has 4 kids and a wife? Does to me.

Your annoying sticking up for people you know nothing about is getting old. Stop the stupidity.

Dubbs wrote:
KitKat wrote:
Dubbs wrote:
KitKat wrote:
Dubbs wrote:
Girl Raised in the South wrote:
Jaye wrote:
"What the heck could an exchange of vows hurt?" ]

I am insinuating nothing G.R.I.T.S., and I see no mockery in allowing newlyweds to perform a small ring ceremony and exchange of vows for non-member parent's sake.


Elder Cree-L Kofford's words:

4. The Brethren counsel Church members not to perform a marriage ceremony following the temple sealing. Occasionally, you’ll find a young couple who will want to do a mock ceremony “so my mother won’t feel left out.� But that makes a mockery out of your temple sealing.


Thank you for posting that article from Brother Kofford, Jaye. I remember reading it in the Ensign. It was very enjoyable and informative. Brother Kofford said it is a mockery to exchange vows civilly after being sealed. An exchange of rings, with no vows spoken, seems to be OK.

And, come on, Jaye. . .I don't claim to know everything about the gospel. In your posts sometimes, you give the impression that you DO know all, and when questioned (by me of late), you raise your voice in your writings. This reminds me of my dad. . .When we disagreed with him and tried to convey our opinions and feelings, he would get angry, and his voice would get louder and louder, refuting us until he couldn't hear us talking anymore. Then, in essence, he would say "We're done here; I've spoken." An occasional challenge is good. We don't always like them, but they serve a purpose. If anything, Jaye, we will keep each other on our toes. I can tell you don't like to be "shut down" when you have an opinion on the forums. . .neither do I.


That's how I picture Jaye in real life. A tyrant with a pretty bad temper. .
If you only knew how I picture you!

Ask me if I care.

Ask me how accurate you are.
Back up a bit and ask Jaye if he cares what you think of him. I know he doesn't.

I think you're jealous of Jaye and the Wolf because you continually make digs at them. The Wolf has never, ever spoken to you, yet you continually bash her. Shame on you.

I simply don't believe that a man who truly honors his Priesthood would act as you do and say the things you say. You do show your true colors on this forum. We all know that, and so do you.


You don't even know them Kitkat, stop acting as if you do, it's comical to see you stick up for strangers you've never met, who could be completly full of BS. And think about my points I made, seem odd for a guy who says he has 4 kids and a wife? Does to me.

Your annoying sticking up for people you know nothing about is getting old. Stop the stupidity.
What's getting old is your constant negativity. Your karma is proof of that. When you realized you've only been back since the 14th, WOW. Your really raking in the negatives. Since I don't give them out, other people find you just as negative and annoying as I do.

And I stand by what I said. If you truly loved the Priesthood, you would not be disgracing it with your obnoxious behavior. It's very telling that you refuse to address this when I bring it up.

If you're talking about Jaye, I have never seen where he said he has four kids.

Dubbs wrote:
KitKat wrote:
Dubbs wrote:
Girl Raised in the South wrote:
Jaye wrote:
"What the heck could an exchange of vows hurt?" ]

I am insinuating nothing G.R.I.T.S., and I see no mockery in allowing newlyweds to perform a small ring ceremony and exchange of vows for non-member parent's sake.


Elder Cree-L Kofford's words:

4. The Brethren counsel Church members not to perform a marriage ceremony following the temple sealing. Occasionally, you’ll find a young couple who will want to do a mock ceremony “so my mother won’t feel left out.� But that makes a mockery out of your temple sealing.


Thank you for posting that article from Brother Kofford, Jaye. I remember reading it in the Ensign. It was very enjoyable and informative. Brother Kofford said it is a mockery to exchange vows civilly after being sealed. An exchange of rings, with no vows spoken, seems to be OK.

And, come on, Jaye. . .I don't claim to know everything about the gospel. In your posts sometimes, you give the impression that you DO know all, and when questioned (by me of late), you raise your voice in your writings. This reminds me of my dad. . .When we disagreed with him and tried to convey our opinions and feelings, he would get angry, and his voice would get louder and louder, refuting us until he couldn't hear us talking anymore. Then, in essence, he would say "We're done here; I've spoken." An occasional challenge is good. We don't always like them, but they serve a purpose. If anything, Jaye, we will keep each other on our toes. I can tell you don't like to be "shut down" when you have an opinion on the forums. . .neither do I.


That's how I picture Jaye in real life. A tyrant with a pretty bad temper. .
If you only knew how I picture you!

Ask me if I care.

Ask me how accurate you are.

"LOL" If you didn't care why would you ask her to ask how accurate she was "LOL"

Dubbs wrote:
Just Reading wrote:
[b]One more thing, Not knowing what to expect in the Temple was one of the reasons I started looking into the Churches past,

I do not like getting into something I know nothing about and I sure didn't want to believe all the rumor's
also I'm sorry but I will not wear those underwear, but that's just me....


If you don't understand posting someones underwear online that they consider sacred is not respectful, your an even bigger idiot than I ever imagined.
"Wait" you consider underwear sacred and I'm the idiot "LOL" "LOL"

And if you didn't know what to expect going into the temple, then you didn't take the temple prep class or as questions,
No I didn't take prep classes, but I did ask a lot of questions...

which is what any normal intelligent person does.
So then Dubbs you didn't take it at all then, because your not normal and you're Definitely not intelligent...

Shows again, you are just not that bright.
"LOL" you're the one with sacred underwear and you say "I'm not too bright" "LOL" Too funny "LOL"

Next you'll tell me you have some immature handshakes or special handclasps or something too!!
Or maybe they'll give you some kind of a token or a new name or something, like the Masons do "LOL"

Dubbs wrote:
KitKat wrote:
Dubbs wrote:
KitKat wrote:
Dubbs wrote:
Girl Raised in the South wrote:
Jaye wrote:
"What the heck could an exchange of vows hurt?" ]

I am insinuating nothing G.R.I.T.S., and I see no mockery in allowing newlyweds to perform a small ring ceremony and exchange of vows for non-member parent's sake.


Elder Cree-L Kofford's words:

4. The Brethren counsel Church members not to perform a marriage ceremony following the temple sealing. Occasionally, you’ll find a young couple who will want to do a mock ceremony “so my mother won’t feel left out.� But that makes a mockery out of your temple sealing.


Thank you for posting that article from Brother Kofford, Jaye. I remember reading it in the Ensign. It was very enjoyable and informative. Brother Kofford said it is a mockery to exchange vows civilly after being sealed. An exchange of rings, with no vows spoken, seems to be OK.

And, come on, Jaye. . .I don't claim to know everything about the gospel. In your posts sometimes, you give the impression that you DO know all, and when questioned (by me of late), you raise your voice in your writings. This reminds me of my dad. . .When we disagreed with him and tried to convey our opinions and feelings, he would get angry, and his voice would get louder and louder, refuting us until he couldn't hear us talking anymore. Then, in essence, he would say "We're done here; I've spoken." An occasional challenge is good. We don't always like them, but they serve a purpose. If anything, Jaye, we will keep each other on our toes. I can tell you don't like to be "shut down" when you have an opinion on the forums. . .neither do I.


That's how I picture Jaye in real life. A tyrant with a pretty bad temper. .
If you only knew how I picture you!

Ask me if I care.

Ask me how accurate you are.
Back up a bit and ask Jaye if he cares what you think of him. I know he doesn't.

I think you're jealous of Jaye and the Wolf because you continually make digs at them. The Wolf has never, ever spoken to you, yet you continually bash her. Shame on you.

I simply don't believe that a man who truly honors his Priesthood would act as you do and say the things you say. You do show your true colors on this forum. We all know that, and so do you.


You don't even know them Kitkat, stop acting as if you do, it's comical to see you stick up for strangers you've never met, who could be completly full of BS. And think about my points I made, seem odd for a guy who says he has 4 kids and a wife? Does to me.

Your annoying sticking up for people you know nothing about is getting old. Stop the stupidity.

Dubbs did you just ridicule KitKat for caring about others??

Wow that says a lot about you Dubbs,

Your God (you know the guy of love) must be so proud of you Dubbs..!!

Dubbs I don't think they have made a word that would describe just how hateful and how low a piece of sh*t you are Dubbs...