Dubbs wrote:Just Reading wrote:
Dubbs wrote:
JLD wrote:
Wren wrote:
Itchy writes redundantly, " . . why don't you accommodate the Church by respecting its beliefs even if it bites?"
Your church then is not all that family oriented if it denies family members from weddings, is it?
The whole point of the temple ceremony is to seal a family for eternity...so I'd say it is very family oriented. So if the ceremony was altered so that anyone could attend and lost it's significance it could actually be less family-oriented than it is now by including the immediate family.
I think when looking at the LDS doctrines you have to keep in mind that they are eternal principles and not just earthly. Bear in mind that by LDS believe God is your father and your children are essentially on loan from Him; parents are given the power of stewardship but ultimately they will be held accountable to God for how they raised His children.
That is my understanding.
Wren knows the church is family oriented, he's just playing devils advocate, as he's been the devils helper for years here.
How in the hell would you know if Wren was the Devils helper,
everytime that you're down there with your butt buddy the Devil Dubbs,
you're on your knees sucking on his family jewels begging for more computer time!!!
SORRY FOLKS BUT SOMEONE HAD TOO SAY IT!!!
Bid dummy's blowin a gasket folks, stand back.
Next think you know, he'll be threatening to torture women and children for a week AGAIN. 
BTW Dubbs there NEVER was a threat to anyone,
it was said that
"IF" bigdaddy was the dangerous crazy person that you said he was, and if you kept saying that he was dangerous and crazy and you kept antagonizing him
then that could happen, "But" bigdaddy is and was not crazy or as dangerous as you claimed he was..
that is what was said Dip... Dubbs
so how was that a threat??