Re:Documents raise questions about religious influ (1 viewing) (1) Guests
Favoured: 2
|
|
|
TOPIC: Re:Documents raise questions about religious influ
|
KitKat (User)
Platinum Boarder
Posts: 13407
|
|
Re:Documents raise questions about religious influ 1 Week, 4 Days ago
|
Karma: 8  
|
|
dean wrote: Wren wrote:JR, let me tell you who Dubbs is.
He lives in an apartment in Phoenix. He goes to school (still?) at University of Phoenix. He works construction as a day laborer, because he can't do anything else.
He is not wealthy, he is not a contractor, he does not own three homes. I am not sure that he is married (because he talked about a girlfriend once a long time ago at the same time he was talking about a wife -- rather poorly I might add).
He has never been a Bishop, and I don't believe that he is a High Priest. His understanding of the temple and its rituals is only minimal, so I doubt that he has been there more than twice, and that is only if he went on a mission and if he got sealed. Maybe, just maybe the two times, but he can't have gone any more because he does not understand what goes on there.
His attitude outside of the forum is exactly what he portrays here because he is not smart enough to dissemble and get away with it all. Shoot, he has never gotten away with it here, has he?
Jaye wroteI'm going to disagree on one point here Wren.
I'll go along with your earlier assessment in which you opined that he was a telephone solicitor...but I can't buy the day laborer in construction.
For one thing...he's much too lazy to get out there and do hard physical labor. For another...he lacks the intelligence, the ability to take instructions, or the ability to think on his feet.
He wouldn't last a single shift as a construction day-laborer.
I stand all amazed.
Not only does it apply to your sharp and incisive analysis about, but we gentile boys used to quietly hum that melody that as the LDS girls fooled around with us when we were all in high school. You aren't making any sense, and what you said has nothing to do with what Jaye said. Did you just come online to brag about your conquests?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Another proud wicked witch!
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
Wren (User)
Platinum Boarder
Posts: 9139
|
|
Re:Documents raise questions about religious influ 1 Week, 4 Days ago
|
Karma: 0  
|
|
KitKat wrote: dean wrote: Wren wrote:JR, let me tell you who Dubbs is.
He lives in an apartment in Phoenix. He goes to school (still?) at University of Phoenix. He works construction as a day laborer, because he can't do anything else.
He is not wealthy, he is not a contractor, he does not own three homes. I am not sure that he is married (because he talked about a girlfriend once a long time ago at the same time he was talking about a wife -- rather poorly I might add).
He has never been a Bishop, and I don't believe that he is a High Priest. His understanding of the temple and its rituals is only minimal, so I doubt that he has been there more than twice, and that is only if he went on a mission and if he got sealed. Maybe, just maybe the two times, but he can't have gone any more because he does not understand what goes on there.
His attitude outside of the forum is exactly what he portrays here because he is not smart enough to dissemble and get away with it all. Shoot, he has never gotten away with it here, has he?
Jaye wroteI'm going to disagree on one point here Wren.
I'll go along with your earlier assessment in which you opined that he was a telephone solicitor...but I can't buy the day laborer in construction.
For one thing...he's much too lazy to get out there and do hard physical labor. For another...he lacks the intelligence, the ability to take instructions, or the ability to think on his feet.
He wouldn't last a single shift as a construction day-laborer.
I stand all amazed.
Not only does it apply to your sharp and incisive analysis about, but we gentile boys used to quietly hum that melody that as the LDS girls fooled around with us when we were all in high school. You aren't making any sense, and what you said has nothing to do with what Jaye said. Did you just come online to brag about your conquests?
It made sense to any who know Mormon culture. It made sense to you, but you have an agenda and didn't like it. Get over it, KitKat.
I was very impressed with Jaye's analysis, and remembered something from a long time ago in Dixie. You don't like it, cool. I could care less.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Last Edit: 2008/05/04 15:33 By Wren.
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
KitKat (User)
Platinum Boarder
Posts: 13407
|
|
Re:Documents raise questions about religious influ 1 Week, 4 Days ago
|
Karma: 8  
|
|
Wren wrote: KitKat wrote: dean wrote: Wren wrote:JR, let me tell you who Dubbs is.
He lives in an apartment in Phoenix. He goes to school (still?) at University of Phoenix. He works construction as a day laborer, because he can't do anything else.
He is not wealthy, he is not a contractor, he does not own three homes. I am not sure that he is married (because he talked about a girlfriend once a long time ago at the same time he was talking about a wife -- rather poorly I might add).
He has never been a Bishop, and I don't believe that he is a High Priest. His understanding of the temple and its rituals is only minimal, so I doubt that he has been there more than twice, and that is only if he went on a mission and if he got sealed. Maybe, just maybe the two times, but he can't have gone any more because he does not understand what goes on there.
His attitude outside of the forum is exactly what he portrays here because he is not smart enough to dissemble and get away with it all. Shoot, he has never gotten away with it here, has he?
Jaye wroteI'm going to disagree on one point here Wren.
I'll go along with your earlier assessment in which you opined that he was a telephone solicitor...but I can't buy the day laborer in construction.
For one thing...he's much too lazy to get out there and do hard physical labor. For another...he lacks the intelligence, the ability to take instructions, or the ability to think on his feet.
He wouldn't last a single shift as a construction day-laborer.
I stand all amazed.
Not only does it apply to your sharp and incisive analysis about, but we gentile boys used to quietly hum that melody that as the LDS girls fooled around with us when we were all in high school. You aren't making any sense, and what you said has nothing to do with what Jaye said. Did you just come online to brag about your conquests?
It made sense to any who know Mormon culture. It made sense to you, but you have an agenda and didn't like it. Get over it, KitKat.
I was very impressed with Jaye's analysis, and remembered something from a long time ago in Dixie. You don't like it, cool. I could care less. Double post..
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Last Edit: 2008/05/04 15:50 By KitKat.
|
|
|
Another proud wicked witch!
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
KitKat (User)
Platinum Boarder
Posts: 13407
|
|
Re:Documents raise questions about religious influ 1 Week, 4 Days ago
|
Karma: 8  
|
|
Wren wrote: KitKat wrote: dean wrote: Wren wrote:JR, let me tell you who Dubbs is.
He lives in an apartment in Phoenix. He goes to school (still?) at University of Phoenix. He works construction as a day laborer, because he can't do anything else.
He is not wealthy, he is not a contractor, he does not own three homes. I am not sure that he is married (because he talked about a girlfriend once a long time ago at the same time he was talking about a wife -- rather poorly I might add).
He has never been a Bishop, and I don't believe that he is a High Priest. His understanding of the temple and its rituals is only minimal, so I doubt that he has been there more than twice, and that is only if he went on a mission and if he got sealed. Maybe, just maybe the two times, but he can't have gone any more because he does not understand what goes on there.
His attitude outside of the forum is exactly what he portrays here because he is not smart enough to dissemble and get away with it all. Shoot, he has never gotten away with it here, has he?
Jaye wroteI'm going to disagree on one point here Wren.
I'll go along with your earlier assessment in which you opined that he was a telephone solicitor...but I can't buy the day laborer in construction.
For one thing...he's much too lazy to get out there and do hard physical labor. For another...he lacks the intelligence, the ability to take instructions, or the ability to think on his feet.
He wouldn't last a single shift as a construction day-laborer.
I stand all amazed.
Not only does it apply to your sharp and incisive analysis about, but we gentile boys used to quietly hum that melody that as the LDS girls fooled around with us when we were all in high school. You aren't making any sense, and what you said has nothing to do with what Jaye said. Did you just come online to brag about your conquests?
It made sense to any who know Mormon culture. It made sense to you, but you have an agenda and didn't like it. Get over it, KitKat.
I was very impressed with Jaye's analysis, and remembered something from a long time ago in Dixie. You don't like it, cool. I could care less.
I AM LDS, born and raised. And NO, it did not make sense to me. You like to act as if you know more about the LDS than anyone out there.
In the past, you have often said things I disagreed with. Rather than be disrespectful to you, I just let it go. You've always treated me with respect up till now. What gives?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Last Edit: 2008/05/04 15:50 By KitKat.
|
|
|
Another proud wicked witch!
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
Blondie (User)
Platinum Boarder
Posts: 2769
|
|
Re:Documents raise questions about religious influ 1 Week, 4 Days ago
|
Karma: 8  
|
Wren wrote:KitKat wrote: dean wrote: Wren wrote:JR, let me tell you who Dubbs is.
He lives in an apartment in Phoenix. He goes to school (still?) at University of Phoenix. He works construction as a day laborer, because he can't do anything else.
He is not wealthy, he is not a contractor, he does not own three homes. I am not sure that he is married (because he talked about a girlfriend once a long time ago at the same time he was talking about a wife -- rather poorly I might add).
He has never been a Bishop, and I don't believe that he is a High Priest. His understanding of the temple and its rituals is only minimal, so I doubt that he has been there more than twice, and that is only if he went on a mission and if he got sealed. Maybe, just maybe the two times, but he can't have gone any more because he does not understand what goes on there.
His attitude outside of the forum is exactly what he portrays here because he is not smart enough to dissemble and get away with it all. Shoot, he has never gotten away with it here, has he?
Jaye wroteI'm going to disagree on one point here Wren.
I'll go along with your earlier assessment in which you opined that he was a telephone solicitor...but I can't buy the day laborer in construction.
For one thing...he's much too lazy to get out there and do hard physical labor. For another...he lacks the intelligence, the ability to take instructions, or the ability to think on his feet.
He wouldn't last a single shift as a construction day-laborer.
I stand all amazed.
Not only does it apply to your sharp and incisive analysis about, but we gentile boys used to quietly hum that melody that as the LDS girls fooled around with us when we were all in high school. You aren't making any sense, and what you said has nothing to do with what Jaye said. Did you just come online to brag about your conquests?
It made sense to any who know Mormon culture. It made sense to you, but you have an agenda and didn't like it. Get over it, KitKat.
I was very impressed with Jaye's analysis, and remembered something from a long time ago in Dixie. You don't like it, cool. I could care less.WHO peed in your cherrio's Wren??????....... You need to take a break  ...... Kitkat, just voiced her opinion as all of us do..... You were damn right nasty.. Dubbs getting to you too????????? HERE HERE!!! ONLY WREN AND DUBSS HAVE ANYTHING TO SAY on this forum worthwhile. So NONE of the other posters can disagree or make comments contrary to what they say....... Good GOD guys, give us all a break from the kindergarten s***........ 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A naughty wench, who loves the men in her life ONE OF THE FORUM WITCHES AND PROUD OF IT
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
KitKat (User)
Platinum Boarder
Posts: 13407
|
|
Re:Documents raise questions about religious influ 1 Week, 4 Days ago
|
Karma: 8  
|
Blondie wrote:Wren wrote: KitKat wrote: dean wrote: Wren wrote:JR, let me tell you who Dubbs is.
He lives in an apartment in Phoenix. He goes to school (still?) at University of Phoenix. He works construction as a day laborer, because he can't do anything else.
He is not wealthy, he is not a contractor, he does not own three homes. I am not sure that he is married (because he talked about a girlfriend once a long time ago at the same time he was talking about a wife -- rather poorly I might add).
He has never been a Bishop, and I don't believe that he is a High Priest. His understanding of the temple and its rituals is only minimal, so I doubt that he has been there more than twice, and that is only if he went on a mission and if he got sealed. Maybe, just maybe the two times, but he can't have gone any more because he does not understand what goes on there.
His attitude outside of the forum is exactly what he portrays here because he is not smart enough to dissemble and get away with it all. Shoot, he has never gotten away with it here, has he?
Jaye wroteI'm going to disagree on one point here Wren.
I'll go along with your earlier assessment in which you opined that he was a telephone solicitor...but I can't buy the day laborer in construction.
For one thing...he's much too lazy to get out there and do hard physical labor. For another...he lacks the intelligence, the ability to take instructions, or the ability to think on his feet.
He wouldn't last a single shift as a construction day-laborer.
I stand all amazed.
Not only does it apply to your sharp and incisive analysis about, but we gentile boys used to quietly hum that melody that as the LDS girls fooled around with us when we were all in high school. You aren't making any sense, and what you said has nothing to do with what Jaye said. Did you just come online to brag about your conquests?
It made sense to any who know Mormon culture. It made sense to you, but you have an agenda and didn't like it. Get over it, KitKat.
I was very impressed with Jaye's analysis, and remembered something from a long time ago in Dixie. You don't like it, cool. I could care less.
WHO peed in your cherrio's Wren??????....... You need to take a break ...... Kitkat, just voiced her opinion as all of us do..... You were damn right nasty.. Dubbs getting to you too?????????
HERE HERE!!! ONLY WREN AND DUBSS HAVE ANYTHING TO SAY on this forum worthwhile.
So NONE of the other posters can disagree or make comments contrary to what they say....... Good GOD guys, give us all a break from the kindergarten s***........  Yeah, that's pretty much what I took from it. Thanks for the backup.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Last Edit: 2008/05/04 15:52 By KitKat.
|
|
|
Another proud wicked witch!
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
|
|
|
|
Generated in 1.14957 Seconds |