Re:Documents raise questions about religious influ (1 viewing) (1) Guests
Favoured: 2
|
|
|
TOPIC: Re:Documents raise questions about religious influ
|
|
|
|
Re:Documents raise questions about religious influ 2 Months ago
|
Karma: -301
|
KitKat wrote:Dubbs wrote:
KitKat wrote:
Dubbs wrote:
KitKat wrote:
Wren wrote:
Dubbs wrote:
Jaye wrote:
Dubbs wrote:
Jaye wrote:
ThomasK wrote:
Jaye wrote:
ThomasK wrote:
No one has ever been disciplined, excommunicated, or any other church measures for not believing or adhering to in the "Adam-God Theory".
If that's what you believe...then that's what you believe. It is unlikely that if they didn't believe, or adhere to any specific doctrine that Brigham Young taught from the pulpit...that they would openly dissent.
Because according to the history of the Danites...members who openly dissented against the orders, teachings, and/or edicts of Brigham Young, might possibly stand to be 'used up'...and the Danites acted under orders.
OK, name names of people that we excommunicated for not believing or adhering to the "Adam-God Theory". You challenged my quote, so let's here it. So what you're also saying is that people were being excommunicated for disagreeing with "theories". What other "theories" was this happening with?
I'm waiting.
And so long as you behave like Kent...you can keep waiting. Or you can discuss this like a rational adult.
It remains to be seen.
At any rate...why do you think Orson Pratt was excommunicated?
He's been respectful Jaye, just as you did with Bearyb when he was, accuse him of being evil etc. What a joke you are. Just answer the question. Is acting like me asking for proof of things you and your twin brother Wren say? If so, I'm proud to be like me.
You prove this claim and show where I have ever referred to Bearyb OR Thomas as being evil.
Up until fairly recently, Thomas has remained respectful.
Fairly recently, he's been switching to less respectful tactics and mannerisms.
When an individual says..."OK, name names of people that we excommunicated for not believing or adhering to the "Adam-God Theory". You challenged my quote, so let's here [sic]it!"...this does not indicate respect OR courteous discourse.
In this...he is beginning to act like you do. If he wishes to engage in discussion...I'm happy to do so.
But if he is going to insert little innuendos and begin to behave in a smarmy fashion...then the discussion will take a different course.
Your delustional, he merely asked a simple quesiton of proof, as would any serious researcher want proof of people who make claims. You did the same thing to Bearyb, as GFTS so quickly noticed about you, you don't like when people challenge you, she's a smart gal. I noticed it from day one.
Dubbs, do you truly believe that your bishop, your stake president, and the regional authorities would approve of what you are doing here?
You are the perfect example of how one letter turns "reason" into "treason", and that is what you are committing against the LDS church with your antics. You lie, you cheat, you fabricate, you swear, you name call, and you say you are a good LDS person.
How many times do you have to say the exact same thing? As you would say... get over it.
 See wren, your act is wearing old, maybe it's time to go get a life and create a new persona, this one is old, tired, and played out.
LOL dubs. Wren knows exactly why I said, that and it has nothing at all to do with you. Sorry.
Huh?  You said it because he is posting the same post over and over did you not?
Don't fret over it.Did you not say what you said because of his repeated posts?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
Wren (User)
Platinum Boarder
Posts: 10384
|
|
Re:Documents raise questions about religious influ 2 Months ago
|
Karma: 8
|
Dubbs wrote:KitKat wrote:
Dubbs wrote:
KitKat wrote:
Wren wrote:
Dubbs wrote:
Jaye wrote:
Dubbs wrote:
Jaye wrote:
ThomasK wrote:
Jaye wrote:
ThomasK wrote:
No one has ever been disciplined, excommunicated, or any other church measures for not believing or adhering to in the "Adam-God Theory".
If that's what you believe...then that's what you believe. It is unlikely that if they didn't believe, or adhere to any specific doctrine that Brigham Young taught from the pulpit...that they would openly dissent.
Because according to the history of the Danites...members who openly dissented against the orders, teachings, and/or edicts of Brigham Young, might possibly stand to be 'used up'...and the Danites acted under orders.
OK, name names of people that we excommunicated for not believing or adhering to the "Adam-God Theory". You challenged my quote, so let's here it. So what you're also saying is that people were being excommunicated for disagreeing with "theories". What other "theories" was this happening with?
I'm waiting.
And so long as you behave like Kent...you can keep waiting. Or you can discuss this like a rational adult.
It remains to be seen.
At any rate...why do you think Orson Pratt was excommunicated?
He's been respectful Jaye, just as you did with Bearyb when he was, accuse him of being evil etc. What a joke you are. Just answer the question. Is acting like me asking for proof of things you and your twin brother Wren say? If so, I'm proud to be like me.
You prove this claim and show where I have ever referred to Bearyb OR Thomas as being evil.
Up until fairly recently, Thomas has remained respectful.
Fairly recently, he's been switching to less respectful tactics and mannerisms.
When an individual says..."OK, name names of people that we excommunicated for not believing or adhering to the "Adam-God Theory". You challenged my quote, so let's here [sic]it!"...this does not indicate respect OR courteous discourse.
In this...he is beginning to act like you do. If he wishes to engage in discussion...I'm happy to do so.
But if he is going to insert little innuendos and begin to behave in a smarmy fashion...then the discussion will take a different course.
Your delustional, he merely asked a simple quesiton of proof, as would any serious researcher want proof of people who make claims. You did the same thing to Bearyb, as GFTS so quickly noticed about you, you don't like when people challenge you, she's a smart gal. I noticed it from day one.
Dubbs, do you truly believe that your bishop, your stake president, and the regional authorities would approve of what you are doing here?
You are the perfect example of how one letter turns "reason" into "treason", and that is what you are committing against the LDS church with your antics. You lie, you cheat, you fabricate, you swear, you name call, and you say you are a good LDS person.
How many times do you have to say the exact same thing? As you would say... get over it.
See wren, your act is wearing old, maybe it's time to go get a life and create a new persona, this one is old, tired, and played out.
LOL dubs. Wren knows exactly why I said, that and it has nothing at all to do with you. Sorry.
Huh? You said it because he is posting the same post over and over did you not? You truly have a problem with basic comprehension. Typical.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
Wren (User)
Platinum Boarder
Posts: 10384
|
|
Re:Documents raise questions about religious influ 2 Months ago
|
Karma: 8
|
|
Dubbs wrote:
Wren wrote:
[
You continue to be the most terrible example of a LDS person I have ever known in all of my years. You lie, you distort, you do all sorts of things that are amazing, but carry on. I will continue to take your arguments apart every time as I always have.
You should know me in real life before judging.
I do.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
KitKat (User)
Platinum Boarder
Posts: 13928
|
|
Re:Documents raise questions about religious influ 2 Months ago
|
Karma: 12
|
Dubbs wrote:KitKat wrote:
Dubbs wrote:
KitKat wrote:
Dubbs wrote:
KitKat wrote:
Wren wrote:
Dubbs wrote:
Jaye wrote:
Dubbs wrote:
Jaye wrote:
ThomasK wrote:
Jaye wrote:
ThomasK wrote:
No one has ever been disciplined, excommunicated, or any other church measures for not believing or adhering to in the "Adam-God Theory".
If that's what you believe...then that's what you believe. It is unlikely that if they didn't believe, or adhere to any specific doctrine that Brigham Young taught from the pulpit...that they would openly dissent.
Because according to the history of the Danites...members who openly dissented against the orders, teachings, and/or edicts of Brigham Young, might possibly stand to be 'used up'...and the Danites acted under orders.
OK, name names of people that we excommunicated for not believing or adhering to the "Adam-God Theory". You challenged my quote, so let's here it. So what you're also saying is that people were being excommunicated for disagreeing with "theories". What other "theories" was this happening with?
I'm waiting.
And so long as you behave like Kent...you can keep waiting. Or you can discuss this like a rational adult.
It remains to be seen.
At any rate...why do you think Orson Pratt was excommunicated?
He's been respectful Jaye, just as you did with Bearyb when he was, accuse him of being evil etc. What a joke you are. Just answer the question. Is acting like me asking for proof of things you and your twin brother Wren say? If so, I'm proud to be like me.
You prove this claim and show where I have ever referred to Bearyb OR Thomas as being evil.
Up until fairly recently, Thomas has remained respectful.
Fairly recently, he's been switching to less respectful tactics and mannerisms.
When an individual says..."OK, name names of people that we excommunicated for not believing or adhering to the "Adam-God Theory". You challenged my quote, so let's here [sic]it!"...this does not indicate respect OR courteous discourse.
In this...he is beginning to act like you do. If he wishes to engage in discussion...I'm happy to do so.
But if he is going to insert little innuendos and begin to behave in a smarmy fashion...then the discussion will take a different course.
Your delustional, he merely asked a simple quesiton of proof, as would any serious researcher want proof of people who make claims. You did the same thing to Bearyb, as GFTS so quickly noticed about you, you don't like when people challenge you, she's a smart gal. I noticed it from day one.
Dubbs, do you truly believe that your bishop, your stake president, and the regional authorities would approve of what you are doing here?
You are the perfect example of how one letter turns "reason" into "treason", and that is what you are committing against the LDS church with your antics. You lie, you cheat, you fabricate, you swear, you name call, and you say you are a good LDS person.
How many times do you have to say the exact same thing? As you would say... get over it.
See wren, your act is wearing old, maybe it's time to go get a life and create a new persona, this one is old, tired, and played out.
LOL dubs. Wren knows exactly why I said, that and it has nothing at all to do with you. Sorry.
Huh? You said it because he is posting the same post over and over did you not?
Don't fret over it.
Did you not say what you said because of his repeated posts? No, not really. As I said, Wren knows why I said it. It's between me and him.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A naughty wench...and a wicked witch!
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
|
|
|
Re:Documents raise questions about religious influ 2 Months ago
|
Karma: -301
|
Wren wrote:Dubbs wrote:
childish is right, this from a college professor (supposedly} , wow, I'd hate to have paid money to listen to wren dry and boring personality, who uses the internet to teach his classes? LOL
Up to 20% of university and college classes are internet these days. You did not know that? Don't worry. You will never be in a class of mine.Internet teacher might be all you could handle. You have the personality for internet. Your right I won't be in any classes of yours, I'm done with the third grade. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
KitKat (User)
Platinum Boarder
Posts: 13928
|
|
Re:Documents raise questions about religious influ 2 Months ago
|
Karma: 12
|
Wren wrote:Dubbs wrote:
KitKat wrote:
Dubbs wrote:
KitKat wrote:
Wren wrote:
Dubbs wrote:
Jaye wrote:
Dubbs wrote:
Jaye wrote:
ThomasK wrote:
Jaye wrote:
ThomasK wrote:
No one has ever been disciplined, excommunicated, or any other church measures for not believing or adhering to in the "Adam-God Theory".
If that's what you believe...then that's what you believe. It is unlikely that if they didn't believe, or adhere to any specific doctrine that Brigham Young taught from the pulpit...that they would openly dissent.
Because according to the history of the Danites...members who openly dissented against the orders, teachings, and/or edicts of Brigham Young, might possibly stand to be 'used up'...and the Danites acted under orders.
OK, name names of people that we excommunicated for not believing or adhering to the "Adam-God Theory". You challenged my quote, so let's here it. So what you're also saying is that people were being excommunicated for disagreeing with "theories". What other "theories" was this happening with?
I'm waiting.
And so long as you behave like Kent...you can keep waiting. Or you can discuss this like a rational adult.
It remains to be seen.
At any rate...why do you think Orson Pratt was excommunicated?
He's been respectful Jaye, just as you did with Bearyb when he was, accuse him of being evil etc. What a joke you are. Just answer the question. Is acting like me asking for proof of things you and your twin brother Wren say? If so, I'm proud to be like me.
You prove this claim and show where I have ever referred to Bearyb OR Thomas as being evil.
Up until fairly recently, Thomas has remained respectful.
Fairly recently, he's been switching to less respectful tactics and mannerisms.
When an individual says..."OK, name names of people that we excommunicated for not believing or adhering to the "Adam-God Theory". You challenged my quote, so let's here [sic]it!"...this does not indicate respect OR courteous discourse.
In this...he is beginning to act like you do. If he wishes to engage in discussion...I'm happy to do so.
But if he is going to insert little innuendos and begin to behave in a smarmy fashion...then the discussion will take a different course.
Your delustional, he merely asked a simple quesiton of proof, as would any serious researcher want proof of people who make claims. You did the same thing to Bearyb, as GFTS so quickly noticed about you, you don't like when people challenge you, she's a smart gal. I noticed it from day one.
Dubbs, do you truly believe that your bishop, your stake president, and the regional authorities would approve of what you are doing here?
You are the perfect example of how one letter turns "reason" into "treason", and that is what you are committing against the LDS church with your antics. You lie, you cheat, you fabricate, you swear, you name call, and you say you are a good LDS person.
How many times do you have to say the exact same thing? As you would say... get over it.
See wren, your act is wearing old, maybe it's time to go get a life and create a new persona, this one is old, tired, and played out.
LOL dubs. Wren knows exactly why I said, that and it has nothing at all to do with you. Sorry.
Huh? You said it because he is posting the same post over and over did you not?
You truly have a problem with basic comprehension. Typical.Agreed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A naughty wench...and a wicked witch!
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
|
|
|
|
Generated in 0.77163 Seconds |
