Dubbs (User)
Platinum Boarder
Posts: 6471
|
|
Re:Documents raise questions about religious influ 5 Months ago
|
Karma: -377  
|
|
It is a fact of history that South Carolina took the initiative that led to the rebellion of the Southern States and that the war began in South Carolina. Reacting negatively to the election of Abraham Lincoln, South Carolina's leaders convened on Dec. 20, 1860 and passed an ordinance of secession. Newly elected Governor Pickins then declared "the dissolution of the union between the state of South Carolina and the other states under the name of the United States." Ten other states later joined South Carolina, but she was the first to rebel. The Civil War was the bloodiest this country has ever seen, causing about 400,000 deaths. The South did enlist the aid of Great Britain and also sought help from France (Great Britain, as I recall, also encouraged France to assist the South). Later, after war had been poured out on the nations of the earth, Great Britain found herself threatened by Nazi Germany and called upon other nations of the earth for her defense. After the Civil War, international intrigues and wars grew to increasing severity, with ghastly international scenes of horror during World War I and World War II, with dozens of other wars having been fought and going on at the moment. War has always been on the earth, but the scale of destruction since the Civil War has grown sharply, and war in the past century has become increasingly multinational rather than bilateral. Truly, war has been poured out on all nations.
The part of the prophecy relates to slaves rising up says "after many days" meaning many days after the prophesied war had begun, not "during the Civil War."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Last Edit: 2008/05/09 16:08 By Dubbs.
|
|
|
My ignore list... The The The The Betz, Kitcat, and the blonde. They have nothing of substance to say anyway, but just like to add smarmy comments to the conversations, so why bother with the the constant smariness?
Wren would like to think he's ignoring me, but he can't, won't and will not.
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
Dubbs (User)
Platinum Boarder
Posts: 6471
|
|
Re:Documents raise questions about religious influ 5 Months ago
|
Karma: -377  
|
Alma Allred (op. cit., p. 166) explains that Joseph's prophecy about war being poured out on all nations had a wider application than just the Civil War, in spite of Mr. Geisler's uninspired translation of the text. Allred also explains that Orson Hyde was mocked by Eastern papers after an 1850 public speech in which he stated that war was about to divide the nation. In 1862, after the beginning of the Civil War, he wrote an "I told you so" letter to the editor of the Missouri Republican of Springfield. What he wrote shows that Joseph's prophecies of war went well beyond the Civil War and, as Allred puts it, "included an additional, chilling detail of events yet future." Here is the excerpt from Orson Hyde: You have scarcely yet read the preface of your national trouble. Many nations will be drawn into the American maelstrom that now whirls through our land; and after many days, when the demon of war shall have exhausted his strength and madness upon American soil, by the destruction of all that can court or provoke opposition, he will remove his headquarters to the banks of the Rhine. Millennial Star, 24 (3 May 1862):274-275, emphasis added. Hyde refers to the demon of war itself, and not just the then-present Civil War, that would later find it's headquarters on the banks of the Rhine - a most appropriate way to foreshadow the great World Wars of this century, wars which were focused on that nation on the banks of the Rhine, Germany, but wars which would involve us and many other nations. It is reasonable to assume that Hyde's reference to the banks of the Rhine is derived from unpublished prophetic statements from Joseph Smith, though we cannot be sure. In any case, it's clear that Joseph's 1832 prophecy of civil war was not obvious to everybody, as our critics contend, or Orson Hyde would not have been mocked by journalists for reiterating that prophecy, and neither would Orson Pratt have had such opposition concerning the prophecy before its fulfillment. And would the editors of the Philadelphia Sunday Mercury have dared refer to "Joe Smith" as "a prophet among us" if his prophecy had been so obvious? http://www2.ida.net/graphics/shirtail/awaron.htm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My ignore list... The The The The Betz, Kitcat, and the blonde. They have nothing of substance to say anyway, but just like to add smarmy comments to the conversations, so why bother with the the constant smariness?
Wren would like to think he's ignoring me, but he can't, won't and will not.
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
Wren (User)
Platinum Boarder
Posts: 11865
|
|
Re:Documents raise questions about religious influ 5 Months ago
|
Karma: -8  
|
|
"Joseph's 1832 prophecy of civil war was not obvious to everybody, as our critics contend," because the tortured analysis at Dubbs' source does not fit context or context of the prophecy.
Dubbs, at least you are trying.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Last Edit: 2008/05/09 16:44 By Wren.
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
Dubbs (User)
Platinum Boarder
Posts: 6471
|
|
Re:Documents raise questions about religious influ 5 Months ago
|
Karma: -377  
|
|
Joseph Smith's prophecy on war in 1832 contained the prediction of the rebellion of slaves, "who shall be marshaled and disciplined for war." In past decades a number of studies have explored the Negro contribution to the Civil War, including that of some half-million slaves who deserted to Union lines.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My ignore list... The The The The Betz, Kitcat, and the blonde. They have nothing of substance to say anyway, but just like to add smarmy comments to the conversations, so why bother with the the constant smariness?
Wren would like to think he's ignoring me, but he can't, won't and will not.
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
Dubbs (User)
Platinum Boarder
Posts: 6471
|
|
Re:Documents raise questions about religious influ 5 Months ago
|
Karma: -377  
|
This quote fit Wren so well from the previously mentioned site, LOL That is what they apparently have the brass to do these days denying any fulfillment of Joseph Smith's Civil War Prophecy. History destroys the critics of Joseph Smith on this one. What the critics have failed to do is read their American History on this one. Now this is literally, and in each and every sense of the word, lazy, silly, and unexcusable. There are over 42,000 websites dealing with the Civil War on the Internet. Surely it is time to learn just a smidgin of American History! Yup. Truth
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Last Edit: 2008/05/09 16:51 By Dubbs.
|
|
|
My ignore list... The The The The Betz, Kitcat, and the blonde. They have nothing of substance to say anyway, but just like to add smarmy comments to the conversations, so why bother with the the constant smariness?
Wren would like to think he's ignoring me, but he can't, won't and will not.
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
Wren (User)
Platinum Boarder
Posts: 11865
|
|
Re:Documents raise questions about religious influ 5 Months ago
|
Karma: -8  
|
|
Nope, true word is that Dubbs and his source distort American and world history. True story! And that is inexcusable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
|