Dubbs wrote:
Just Reading wrote:
Dubbs wrote:
Just Reading wrote:
Also Dubbs read this:

most of Egyptian Manuscript # 4 is in Joseph Smith's handwriting. In particular, page V, which contains the two hieratic characters. This is one more proof of the link between the "Alphabet and Grammar" and "The Book of Abraham." Has any Mormon apologist attempted to refute this connection? In this case, they can't state that "The Scribes Did It", because it was written by Joseph Smith.
http://www.lds-mormon.com/scribesdidittheory.shtml


That's an anti site Big, try reading the LDS version, it makes alot more sense.

"LOL" that your answer to everything "LOL"

BTW Dubbs who has more of a reason to lie, the anti sites or the LDS Church,

if an anti site lies they defeat their purpose
if the LDS church are lying it's to protect themselves, which they said they would do and have done it the past (polygamy)

since anti's are under the influence of Satan, they are more apt to lie.

"LOL" are you sure it isn't the other way around "LOL"

Think of all the things the church has done that God despises like, Polygamy, Murder, Worshiping Idols, believing they will be Gods like God, lying, they don't Remember the Sabbath or keep it holy, because the Sabbath is Saturday not Sunday, organized Religions/Churches changed it to Sunday, bearing false witness against the Indians, stealing from non-Mormons when they traveled threw Utah in the past, Judging of the Blacks, Etc.

your Church has broke 8 of the 10 Commandments...

Yes Dubbs I know other churches have done some of those things also,

"But that means what"???

remember I have a problem against all organized Religions/Churches...

Dubbs wrote:
Wren wrote:
I am good at logic. .

Should have....

I am very logical... dumbass.

Yes Dubbs it's very logical you are a Dumbass

Just Reading wrote:
Dubbs wrote:
Wren wrote:
I am good at logic. .

Should have....

I am very logical... dumbass.

Yes Dubbs it's very logical you are a Dumbass

LOL, Dubbs even you gotta admit this is fuuny.

ThomasK wrote:
Just Reading wrote:
Dubbs wrote:
Wren wrote:
I am good at logic. .

Should have....

I am very logical... dumbass.

Yes Dubbs it's very logical you are a Dumbass

LOL, Dubbs even you gotta admit this is fuuny.

I disagree, because it's sad. His problem is not cognitive limitation but emotional retardation. Dubbs is very, very angry at something or someone at some time in his life, and he lashes out at us to make up for his self-loathing. He is also stupid. He has the ability to learn but instead willfully refuses to do so.

I read here every day, and I do not post often. But Dubbs is a sad, sad case.

dean wrote:
ThomasK wrote:
Just Reading wrote:
Dubbs wrote:
Wren wrote:
I am good at logic. .

Should have....

I am very logical... dumbass.

Yes Dubbs it's very logical you are a Dumbass

LOL, Dubbs even you gotta admit this is fuuny.

I disagree. His problem is not cognitive limitation but emotional retardation. Dubbs is very, very angry at something or someone at some time in his life, and he lashes out at us to make up for his self-loathing. He is also stupid -- he has the ability to learn but instead willfully refuses to do so.

Stop trying to be some kind of arm chair, internet blog pscycholgist, You know nothing about me nor anyone here.

Dubbs wrote:
dean wrote:
ThomasK wrote:
Just Reading wrote:
Dubbs wrote:
Wren wrote:
I am good at logic. .

Should have....

I am very logical... dumbass.

Yes Dubbs it's very logical you are a Dumbass

LOL, Dubbs even you gotta admit this is fuuny.

I disagree. His problem is not cognitive limitation but emotional retardation. Dubbs is very, very angry at something or someone at some time in his life, and he lashes out at us to make up for his self-loathing. He is also stupid -- he has the ability to learn but instead willfully refuses to do so.

Stop trying to be some kind of arm chair, internet blog pscycholgist, You know nothing about me nor anyone here.

To the contrary, we can all can tell much about you by the way you write here.

For instance, you are not well educated, you resent those who are, you have no gentleness of nature, you possess no courtesy toward women, and in comparison with what others write (JustReading, Bearyb, Wren, Jaye, KitKat, UncleBud, Blogan -- note these are active LDS, non-LDS -- and everyone of them far more knowledgable than you) you do not have a grasp of your religion's history or your church's doctrine and policies.

It is does not matter whether you agree with me or attack me.

It's true. You are what you appear to be here. Otherwise, you would have a split personality, and that's scary because you here might be the nice of the two.

Wren gave you wise counsel -- go and ponder mykidsgrandma's advice to you. If you are a praying man, then do that.