Re:Documents raise questions about religious influ (1 viewing) (1) Guests
Favoured: 4
|
|
|
TOPIC: Re:Documents raise questions about religious influ
|
Wren (User)
Platinum Boarder
Posts: 12253
|
|
Re:Documents raise questions about religious influ 4 Months, 2 Weeks ago
|
Karma: -11
|
|
[b]Dubbs wrote: ". . . just did a google search for things you've said here, nothing wrong nor illegal about that."
Yes, there is something wrong with that if you collect information with intent to harm.
That is one of the reasons I gaslighted you, to let you demonstrate a pattern of intention to harm others if given the chance.
You keep it up, you will be reported to the law enforcement authorities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
|
|
|
Re:Documents raise questions about religious influ 4 Months, 2 Weeks ago
|
Karma: 9
|
Wren wrote:[b]Dubbs wrote: ". . . just did a google search for things you've said here, nothing wrong nor illegal about that."
Yes, there is something wrong with that if you collect information with intent to harm.
That is one of the reasons I gaslighted you, to let you demonstrate a pattern of intention to harm others if given the chance.
You keep it up, you will be reported to the law enforcement authorities.I think the mental heath authorities would be more appropriate. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A proud Utah County heretic!
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
Dubbs (User)
Platinum Boarder
Posts: 7852
|
|
Re:Documents raise questions about religious influ 4 Months, 2 Weeks ago
|
Karma: -436
|
|
Wren wrote:
Dubbs Kitkats favorite wrote:
Wren wrote:
Dubbs Kitkats favorite wrote:
Wren wrote:
Dubbs Kitkats favorite wrote:
Wren wrote:
, Spencer W. Kimball did,
You have proof he was a bigot, then changed? Your a lieing prick Wren.
Dubbs is doing selective editing again. This puts it back into context: "But good-meaning bigots can change. Abraham Lincoln did, Spencer W. Kimball did, Reagan never did -- bigotry is hard to shake." Please note that Dubbs left out that SWK changed for the better in this area.
Read SWK's works, percy, and get back to me. He talks about how hard it was for him to overcome his Arizona LDS upbringing and the attitudes towards people of color. My friends and I, too, in St. George and Washington County had to overcome that bigotry, Dubbs. Didn't matter whether you were LDS or not in our area, and I guess it was the same where SWK grew up as well.
Blowing a fuse, huh, percy? Too funny.
Your claiming he was a bigot, then changed, do you have proof he was a bigot before 1978?
Didn't think so, so shut your yapper punk.
Then you know very little about SWK.
Show the evidence then.
It's in his own words in the histories about him. Go look them up yourself.
Yea, just as I thought, you have no proof, typical Wren.
Bad mouthing the Prophets, disgusting for an ex Mormon, turned anti.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
Dubbs (User)
Platinum Boarder
Posts: 7852
|
|
Re:Documents raise questions about religious influ 4 Months, 2 Weeks ago
|
Karma: -436
|
Wren wrote:[b]Dubbs wrote: ". . . just did a google search for things you've said here, nothing wrong nor illegal about that."
Yes, there is something wrong with that if you collect information with intent to harm.
That is one of the reasons I gaslighted you, to let you demonstrate a pattern of intention to harm others if given the chance.
You keep it up, you will be reported to the law enforcement authorities.They'd laugh at you, intent to harm? If I had intent to harm it would have happened by now don't you think? Trust me, I have no need to contact any of the nut jobs here, course I still could call Jean if you like? 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
KitKat (User)
Platinum Boarder
Posts: 15771
|
|
Re:Documents raise questions about religious influ 4 Months, 2 Weeks ago
|
Karma: 30
|
Dubbs Kitkats favorite wrote:Wren wrote:
[b]Dubbs wrote: ". . . just did a google search for things you've said here, nothing wrong nor illegal about that."
Yes, there is something wrong with that if you collect information with intent to harm.
That is one of the reasons I gaslighted you, to let you demonstrate a pattern of intention to harm others if given the chance.
You keep it up, you will be reported to the law enforcement authorities.
They'd laugh at you, intent to harm? If I had intent to harm it would have happened by now don't you think?
Trust me, I have no need to contact any of the nut jobs here, course I still could call Jean if you like? We've been begging you to call. What's stopping you? Idle threats, huh? Either call or shut up about it. A teacher up here in my county was just sentenced to a year in jail for stalking a student. His stalking consisted of texting her. Nothing sexual or anything else involved, just texting. So, if you think what you're doing isn't stalking, you've got another think coming. Stalking does not necessarily involve "intent to harm".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Last Edit: 2008/07/09 09:18 By KitKat.
|
|
|
A naughty and piquant wench...and a wicked witch
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
Dubbs (User)
Platinum Boarder
Posts: 7852
|
|
Re:Documents raise questions about religious influ 4 Months, 2 Weeks ago
|
Karma: -436
|
KitKat wrote:Dubbs Kitkats favorite wrote:
Wren wrote:
[b]Dubbs wrote: ". . . just did a google search for things you've said here, nothing wrong nor illegal about that."
Yes, there is something wrong with that if you collect information with intent to harm.
That is one of the reasons I gaslighted you, to let you demonstrate a pattern of intention to harm others if given the chance.
You keep it up, you will be reported to the law enforcement authorities.
They'd laugh at you, intent to harm? If I had intent to harm it would have happened by now don't you think?
Trust me, I have no need to contact any of the nut jobs here, course I still could call Jean if you like?
We've been begging you to call. What's stopping you? Idle threats, huh? Either call or shut up about it.
A teacher up here in my county was just sentenced to a year in jail for stalking a student. His stalking consisted of texting her. Nothing sexual or anything else involved, just texting. So, if you think what you're doing isn't stalking, you've got another think coming. Stalking does not necessarily involve "intent to harm".A blog's a little different than a personal contact via a personal text message. And besides that, I have done no stalking here, they'd laugh at you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
|
|
|
|
Generated in 0.80272 Seconds |
