Dubbs Kitkats favorite wrote:
KitKat wrote:
Dubbs Kitkats favorite wrote:
Wren wrote:
[b]Dubbs wrote: ". . . just did a google search for things you've said here, nothing wrong nor illegal about that."

Yes, there is something wrong with that if you collect information with intent to harm.

That is one of the reasons I gaslighted you, to let you demonstrate a pattern of intention to harm others if given the chance.

You keep it up, you will be reported to the law enforcement authorities.

They'd laugh at you, intent to harm? If I had intent to harm it would have happened by now don't you think?

Trust me, I have no need to contact any of the nut jobs here, course I still could call Jean if you like?
We've been begging you to call. What's stopping you? Idle threats, huh? Either call or shut up about it.

A teacher up here in my county was just sentenced to a year in jail for stalking a student. His stalking consisted of texting her. Nothing sexual or anything else involved, just texting. So, if you think what you're doing isn't stalking, you've got another think coming. Stalking does not necessarily involve "intent to harm".

A blog's a little different than a personal contact via a personal text message. And besides that, I have done no stalking here, they'd laugh at you.
You keep thinking that, ok?

You have continually said that you haven't done anything illegal. I just pointed out that stalking in and of itself doesn't always involve anything illegal. But whether it's stalking or not, keeping a list on Jaye is not normal behavior. As you would say, you don't even know him. You'll never meet him. You don't even want to meet him. So why in heaven's name do you need to keep a list on him? You're not quite "normal", dubs.

Will you PLEASE call "Jean"? Please do it!

KitKat wrote:
Dubbs Kitkats favorite wrote:
KitKat wrote:
Dubbs Kitkats favorite wrote:
Wren wrote:
[b]Dubbs wrote: ". . . just did a google search for things you've said here, nothing wrong nor illegal about that."

Yes, there is something wrong with that if you collect information with intent to harm.

That is one of the reasons I gaslighted you, to let you demonstrate a pattern of intention to harm others if given the chance.

You keep it up, you will be reported to the law enforcement authorities.

They'd laugh at you, intent to harm? If I had intent to harm it would have happened by now don't you think?

Trust me, I have no need to contact any of the nut jobs here, course I still could call Jean if you like?
We've been begging you to call. What's stopping you? Idle threats, huh? Either call or shut up about it.

A teacher up here in my county was just sentenced to a year in jail for stalking a student. His stalking consisted of texting her. Nothing sexual or anything else involved, just texting. So, if you think what you're doing isn't stalking, you've got another think coming. Stalking does not necessarily involve "intent to harm".

A blog's a little different than a personal contact via a personal text message. And besides that, I have done no stalking here, they'd laugh at you.
You keep thinking that, ok?

You have continually said that you haven't done anything illegal. I just pointed out that stalking in and of itself doesn't always involve anything illegal. But whether it's stalking or not, keeping a list on Jaye is not normal behavior. As you would say, you don't even know him. You'll never meet him. You don't even want to meet him. So why in heaven's name do you need to keep a list on him? You're not quite "normal", dubs.

I don't really care what you consider normal or not normal behavior, I have my thoughts about some things you do being "normal" and nor Normal. I care about legal matters, and by your definition of changing my moniker as being stalking, they'd laugh at you. They'd laugh at Wren and Jaye if he called and said he's making a list of things we've said,

Nobody here really knows the law, and would get laughed at.

Dubbs Kitkats favorite wrote:
KitKat wrote:
Dubbs Kitkats favorite wrote:
KitKat wrote:
Dubbs Kitkats favorite wrote:
Wren wrote:
[b]Dubbs wrote: ". . . just did a google search for things you've said here, nothing wrong nor illegal about that."

Yes, there is something wrong with that if you collect information with intent to harm.

That is one of the reasons I gaslighted you, to let you demonstrate a pattern of intention to harm others if given the chance.

You keep it up, you will be reported to the law enforcement authorities.

They'd laugh at you, intent to harm? If I had intent to harm it would have happened by now don't you think?

Trust me, I have no need to contact any of the nut jobs here, course I still could call Jean if you like?
We've been begging you to call. What's stopping you? Idle threats, huh? Either call or shut up about it.

A teacher up here in my county was just sentenced to a year in jail for stalking a student. His stalking consisted of texting her. Nothing sexual or anything else involved, just texting. So, if you think what you're doing isn't stalking, you've got another think coming. Stalking does not necessarily involve "intent to harm".

A blog's a little different than a personal contact via a personal text message. And besides that, I have done no stalking here, they'd laugh at you.
You keep thinking that, ok?

You have continually said that you haven't done anything illegal. I just pointed out that stalking in and of itself doesn't always involve anything illegal. But whether it's stalking or not, keeping a list on Jaye is not normal behavior. As you would say, you don't even know him. You'll never meet him. You don't even want to meet him. So why in heaven's name do you need to keep a list on him? You're not quite "normal", dubs.

I don't really care what you consider normal or not normal behavior, I have my thoughts about some things you do being "normal" and nor Normal. I care about legal matters, and by your definition of changing my moniker as being stalking, they'd laugh at you. They'd laugh at Wren and Jaye if he called and said he's making a list of things we've said,

Nobody here really knows the law, and would get laughed at.
Whatever..

Call Jean yet?

I like watching Wren squirm, I'll continue to play that card thanks. LOL

Dubbs Kitkats favorite wrote:
I like watching Wren squirm, I'll continue to play that card thanks. LOL
LOL..I know a copout when I see one. You won't call, and we all know why.

Dubbs Kitkats favorite wrote:
Wren wrote:
[b]Dubbs wrote: ". . . just did a google search for things you've said here, nothing wrong nor illegal about that."

Yes, there is something wrong with that if you collect information with intent to harm.

That is one of the reasons I gaslighted you, to let you demonstrate a pattern of intention to harm others if given the chance.

You keep it up, you will be reported to the law enforcement authorities.

They'd laugh at you, intent to harm? If I had intent to harm it would have happened by now don't you think?

Trust me, I have no need to contact any of the nut jobs here, course I still could call Jean if you like?

You will never call Jean because you are a coward.

You would never come after me because you are a coward.

But without a doubt you would go after a woman if you could get away with it.