Jaye (User)
Platinum Boarder
Posts: 11590
|
|
Re:Documents raise questions about religious influ 4 Months, 4 Weeks ago
|
Karma: 6
|
Dubbs wrote:Jaye wrote:
I am leaving...just as soon as the entire crew shows up.
The guys from J&D? ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resident husband of a white witch and lover of witches in general.
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
Jaye (User)
Platinum Boarder
Posts: 11590
|
|
Re:Documents raise questions about religious influ 4 Months, 4 Weeks ago
|
Karma: 6
|
|
Wren wrote:
Drive and work carefully, Jaye.
Dubbs will be disappointed and much quieter with you gone for a while. He will probably step up his nagging of KitKat; he likes to torment her more when you are not around.
Thank you Wren...we will. Due to leave around noon.
As for Kent...I find it disgusting and despicable that a man claiming to be a priesthood holder AND a current High Priest would treat ANY woman the way he treats the women on this forum.
He is the epitome of cowardice in my estimation.
It saddens me that KitKat might bear the brunt of his frustration...but you, and John, and Sir John, BLogan and Uncle Bud can tag team him.
Hell...any one of you manage just fine to give him a big-toe enema anytime you address his comments.
But at any rate...KitKat is a good, strong woman...and she gives him as good as he dishes out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resident husband of a white witch and lover of witches in general.
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
|
|
|
Re:Documents raise questions about religious influ 4 Months, 4 Weeks ago
|
Karma: 0
|
|
Wren wrote:
Jaye wrote:
Wren wrote:
Dubbs has lost the discussion on who can assume priesthood control. It goes by hierarchy. That is exactly what the FLDS and other denominations preach. According to them, President Grant apostasized, and others assumed the keys.
That makes just nine (9) of dozens of discussion he has lost because he either does not know LDS history, dogma, doctrine, and policy, or he is a deliberate plant to make the LDS church look a bunch of crazies.
No one, investigating this forum, after perusing Dubbs' posts would ever consider investigating the LDS church further. They would say, "What a bunch of whackos."
This is the very reason that the LDS Church needs people like me, KitKat and other reasonable and well informed members...to perform damage control after people like Kent drag the Church into disgrace.
Dubbs seems to revel in disgracing the Church.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Last Edit: 2008/05/11 15:40 By Dairyman.
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
|
|
|
Re:Documents raise questions about religious influ 4 Months, 4 Weeks ago
|
Karma: 1
|
|
Jaye wrote:
Wren wrote:
Drive and work carefully, Jaye.
Dubbs will be disappointed and much quieter with you gone for a while. He will probably step up his nagging of KitKat; he likes to torment her more when you are not around.
Thank you Wren...we will. Due to leave around noon.
As for Kent...I find it disgusting and despicable that a man claiming to be a priesthood holder AND a current High Priest would treat ANY woman the way he treats the women on this forum.
He is the epitome of cowardice in my estimation.
It saddens me that KitKat might bear the brunt of his frustration...but you, and John, and Sir John, BLogan and Uncle Bud can tag team him.
Hell...any one of you manage just fine to give him a big-toe enema anytime you address his comments.
But at any rate...KitKat is a good, strong woman...and she gives him as good as he dishes out.
I wonder if Dubbs celebrates Mothers Day for his wife,
I also wonder if if knows Mothers Day was started by "as he would call them" those bible thumping nut cases of the Methodist Episcopal Church
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
BLogan (User)
Gold Boarder
Posts: 287
|
|
Re:Documents raise questions about religious influ 4 Months, 4 Weeks ago
|
Karma: 15
|
Dubbs wrote:Jaye wrote:
Wren wrote:
You are splitting hairs, Jaye.
It does not matter what we think today about whether it was doctrinal then. The Mormon leadership under Young considered it doctrine, which is all that matters.
Yes? Isn't that pretty much what I've been saying?
This is where Wren's logic get's really far off, just as we have logical thinking Mormons in our day, I'm sure not "all" mormons took Brighams words as scripture, as they weren't in scripture. As my great grandfather questioned certain doctrine taught by Brigham in his journal, I'm sure he wasn't the only one.dubbie, the point is that Brigham Young was sustained by the Mormon membership of that day as being a Prophet, get it in your thick skull gumball, Brigham Young taught and believed these things as the evidence proves and it doesn't mean squat what your grandfather or the membership thought about it. the evidence proves that Brigham Young was not a Prophet of God.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
|
|
|
Re:Documents raise questions about religious influ 4 Months, 4 Weeks ago
|
Karma: -4
|
BLogan wrote:Dubbs wrote:
Jaye wrote:
Wren wrote:
You are splitting hairs, Jaye.
It does not matter what we think today about whether it was doctrinal then. The Mormon leadership under Young considered it doctrine, which is all that matters.
Yes? Isn't that pretty much what I've been saying?
This is where Wren's logic get's really far off, just as we have logical thinking Mormons in our day, I'm sure not "all" mormons took Brighams words as scripture, as they weren't in scripture. As my great grandfather questioned certain doctrine taught by Brigham in his journal, I'm sure he wasn't the only one.
dubbie, the point is that Brigham Young was sustained by the Mormon membership of that day as being a Prophet, get it in your thick skull gumball, Brigham Young taught and believed these things as the evidence proves and it doesn't mean squat what your grandfather or the membership thought about it. the evidence proves that Brigham Young was not a Prophet of God.I always enjoy seeing BLogan slap ole dubbs aroung and that GUMBALL name really cracks me up.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The administrator has disabled public write access. |
|
