ThomasK wrote:
truthhurts wrote:
Well, it would appear the Iraqi's themselves favor the Obama Plan, since they now want a timetable themselves. All this talk about Obama wanting a timetable and Bush and McCain not wanting one, and now the Iraqi's say they want one.

Imagine that.

I started a new thread on it. Enjoy.

New Thread

Yes that's true. They have recently refused an agreement to have a permanent military base in Iraq. Frankly, I think that is a good sign.

In my opinion, that is the way it should be.

BTW, this isn't new news.
The part about refusing to allow us to build new bases might be old news, but the part about the withdrawl timetables just hit the wire today. Perhaps we should get our news from "Associated Thomas" in the future, instead of "Associated Press". In fact, it is on the front page, lead article, on The Washington Post right now. You must have stumped them too.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/

Why don't you drop the Editor of The Washington Post a line and ask him why he has "old news" on the front page?

Nevertheless, I am glad you think it is a good sign. I'll certainly be interested in your response when Bush (and McCain) say "No withdrawl timetables...we'll leave when WE are ready, not when you want us to" or something to that effect.

truthhurts wrote:
ThomasK wrote:
truthhurts wrote:
Well, it would appear the Iraqi's themselves favor the Obama Plan, since they now want a timetable themselves. All this talk about Obama wanting a timetable and Bush and McCain not wanting one, and now the Iraqi's say they want one.

Imagine that.

I started a new thread on it. Enjoy.

New Thread

Yes that's true. They have recently refused an agreement to have a permanent military base in Iraq. Frankly, I think that is a good sign.

In my opinion, that is the way it should be.

BTW, this isn't new news.
The part about refusing to allow us to build new bases might be old news, but the part about the withdrawl timetables just hit the wire today. Perhaps we should get our news from "Associated Thomas" in the future, instead of "Associated Press".

Nevertheless, I am glad you think it is a good sign. I'll certainly be interested in your response when Bush (and McCain) say "No withdrawl timetables...we'll leave when WE are ready, not when you want us to" or something to that effect.

It doesn't matter what they say, what ThomasK says, what Obama says, what anyone says. I bet we will be in Iraq until it is safe for us to disengage. A timetable, any timetable, is likely to be a load of BS anyway. Great on paper but improbable in reality - kiinda like the war in that regard, lol.

So Tom Tom, Occupying 2 countries is a good thing? When do we get out? How about now?

JLD wrote:
truthhurts wrote:
ThomasK wrote:
truthhurts wrote:
Well, it would appear the Iraqi's themselves favor the Obama Plan, since they now want a timetable themselves. All this talk about Obama wanting a timetable and Bush and McCain not wanting one, and now the Iraqi's say they want one.

Imagine that.

I started a new thread on it. Enjoy.



Yes that's true. They have recently refused an agreement to have a permanent military base in Iraq. Frankly, I think that is a good sign.

In my opinion, that is the way it should be.

BTW, this isn't new news.
The part about refusing to allow us to build new bases might be old news, but the part about the withdrawl timetables just hit the wire today. Perhaps we should get our news from "Associated Thomas" in the future, instead of "Associated Press".

Nevertheless, I am glad you think it is a good sign. I'll certainly be interested in your response when Bush (and McCain) say "No withdrawl timetables...we'll leave when WE are ready, not when you want us to" or something to that effect.

It doesn't matter what they say, what ThomasK says, what Obama says, what anyone says. I bet we will be in Iraq until it is safe for us to disengage. A timetable, any timetable, is likely to be a load of BS anyway. Great on paper but improbable in reality - kiinda like the war in that regard, lol.

EXACTLY!

This timetable jargon is a huge pile of BS. But it sounds good to the kool aid drinkers. Then there is uto uto, he spikes his kool aid with ketchup. I guess that makes it easier for him to swallow.

ThomasK wrote:
This timetable jargon is a huge pile of BS
Sooooo, which is it Thomas? A huge pile of BS, or...let's see, what was that you said about it just a few posts ago? Oh yeah, here it is:

ThomasK wrote:
Frankly, I think that is a good sign.
You flip flopped on the same page, for crying out loud. You were a Romeny supporter, I bet.

truthhurts wrote:
ThomasK wrote:
This timetable jargon is a huge pile of BS
Sooooo, which is it Thomas? A huge pile of BS, or...let's see, what was that you said about it just a few posts ago? Oh yeah, here it is:

ThomasK wrote:
Frankly, I think that is a good sign.
You flip flopped on the same page, for crying out loud. You were a Romeny supporter, I bet.

You are so much like dubbs, it isn't funny. I was referring to the Iraq people thinking for themselves. Now drink, your kool aid is getting warm.