Dubbs wrote:
BBBB wrote:
Just Reading wrote:
Just Reading wrote:
Dubbs wrote:
KitKat wrote:
Dubbs wrote:
KitKat wrote:


I know people can pretend to be somethning different on the internet. That is why I have taken the time to get to know several posters better away from this forum. And they are just what they claim to be.


Know you claim you know some outside the site? Riigggghht. After saying many times you had never met anyone here.
Hey, Goofy, where did I say "MEET"? I didn't!!!! I said "got to know". That doesn't have to be done face to face. I have gotten to know a couple of posters better AWAY FROM THE FORUM. That does not mean I met them in person. Your reading comprehension STINKS!

Ahh, so more blogging and you are getting to know people? Or emails and you are getting to know them?

Please stop Kitkat, you know NOTHING about them.

Dubbs I have met many of the people on here, in-person and yes they are who they say they are,
So now what do you say about that???

again Dubbs:
I have met many of the people on here, in-person and yes they are who they say they are,
So now what do you say about that???

Hi, guys and wrenches
I am thinking: someday I might have a chance to meet many of you on here, in person, in order to show you all my complaints letters to the Church leaders, to discuss my doings, and to digest my own experience, to re-structure my own psychology.

If your complaint letters are anything like what you write here, we will see why you havne't gotten much response tigerlily II


Also, have some respect for the brethren, keep your conversations private, as they are meant to be. Have some class dude.

I find the underlined hilarious, and necessary

1. Please refrain from name-dropping. BBBB is a newbie, and the reference to Tigerlily isn't going to mean anything to him.

And it is rude to keep mocking and deriding a woman who is a member of your own faith...especially as she is no longer around to defend herself.

It just exemplifies how boorish your personal behavior is.

2. BBBB has as much right to discuss what he sees as problems with the administration of the LDS Church as you do to discuss your support of the LDS Church.

He has kept it respectful enough...and he has not resorted to name dropping as you have done so often in the past.

He has IMMINENTLY more class than you ever will.

3. In an earlier post, you quoted from 2 Nephi.

I would like to remind you to pay heed to that Chapter, and don't forget what was written in verse 8 about taking advantage of others because of their words, and digging pits for your neighbors.

You would deign to mocking a man who is doing the best he can to communicate in a language which is not his Native tongue.

How long...will the mocker and scorner delight in mocking and scorning?

Bishop Dubbs has been the worst anti-LDS individual on this forum ever.

Grizz will get into the celestial kingdom before Bishop Dubbs.

And now as we rapidly approach another Saturday evening...and the Sabbath approaches...the Forum cronies prepare themselves for the inevitable Sunday of dealing with Kent's hateful comments before and after he goes to Church for his weekly stuffing of SMUG.

Wren wrote:
Bishop Dubbs has been the worst anti-LDS individual on this forum ever.

Grizz will get into the celestial kingdom before Bishop Dubbs.

Things that make you go...HMMMMMMMMMM.

Jaye wrote:
Dubbs wrote:
Sir John the Apostate wrote:
Dubbs wrote:
Jaye wrote:
JLD wrote:
Jaye wrote:
Yes...it is possible that you could be wrong JLD. I don't remember ever promising not to take my shirt off while posing for a picture.

And I do, on occasion, take my shirt off if it gets hot enough on a parking lot we're paving or sealing.

That's why I don't wear the G's to work. And that's probably why LDS pro-athletes don't wear the G's to work.

Time and place for everything I suppose.

Which brings us to these young Mormon men who posed for the calender.

If they are still currently serving missions...so long as they don't go door to door preaching the gospel without a shirt...who really cares?

I suppose that there are those in the LDS faith who are letter of the law types who even wear their G's while they're having intercourse.

But I've never been a letter of the law kind of guy myself.

Have you?

Depends. If I make a covenant or a promise or a commitment I do my best to keep it. Again, I don't wear garments and haven't been through the temple. My parents have. They almost never remove the garments, it is their belief that they shouldn't be removed unless absolutely necessary. Obviously, there are times that can remove them...I don't think posing in those pictures is one of them. If I'm wrong then I'm wrong.

Do your parents swim or sunbathe?


Oh brother, you are so dense sometimes, you seriously don't understand that their are excpetions, and you think this calender falls in an exception? Wow, amazing.

I've been thinking about this whole topless calender thing and I've decided that.

I CAN'T WAIT FOR THE ONE WITH WITH THE SISTER MISSIONARIES TO COME OUT.



That's because your a sick minded pervert.

This from a dude who liked to post pictures of a naked fat guy.

So...what's more perverted? A guy thinking about pictures of topless women? Or a guy who likes to post pictures of naked fat guys?

It least I'm honest about what kind of pervert I am!!!!!

True...but hey...you're just a guy.