truthhurts wrote:
ThomasK wrote:
So you think your guy will bring us economic prosperity. Now that's funny. But then, know one has ever acused you of knowing anything about economics. Now what's in your drink?
That's a curious comment, Thomas, considering McCain has admitted that he knows little about economics and his campaign co-chair and chief economic adviser (until just a few days ago), Phil "Enron" Gramm, said that we are a nation of economic whiners and that we are only in a "mental recession." That's your boy McCain for you.

You have a difficult time paying attention. Now what was it I said earlier about both canidates? Never mind, Obama will make you rich. And you won't have to do anything for it.

Just Reading wrote:
Uncle_Bud wrote:
ThomasK wrote:
eric hussein miami wrote:
ThomasK wrote:
eric hussein miami wrote:
Do you know what a non sequitur is?
"Obama war drums?"
I realize you can't insult the intelligence of the neo-cons, Thomas. Have some regard for the rest of us.

Don't concern yourself with "phrases" and your "labels". That is only self serving.

Why do you think it's a good idea to pull out of Iraq and increase our presence in Afghanistan?

I'm chastised, Thomas. I bow to the level of your intellect. Adios, cucaracha!

I wasn't looking for chastisement. I was looking for your ideas on these situations. You and truth are too busy worrying about one-upmanship.

My money's on Eric!

Oh really boys. Bless me with more of your intellect. What's your magic answer?

mine too!!!

Oh really boys. Bless me with more of your intellect. What's your magic answer?

ThomasK wrote:
Just Reading wrote:
Uncle_Bud wrote:
ThomasK wrote:
eric hussein miami wrote:
ThomasK wrote:
eric hussein miami wrote:
Do you know what a non sequitur is?
"Obama war drums?"
I realize you can't insult the intelligence of the neo-cons, Thomas. Have some regard for the rest of us.

Don't concern yourself with "phrases" and your "labels". That is only self serving.

Why do you think it's a good idea to pull out of Iraq and increase our presence in Afghanistan?

I'm chastised, Thomas. I bow to the level of your intellect. Adios, cucaracha!

I wasn't looking for chastisement. I was looking for your ideas on these situations. You and truth are too busy worrying about one-upmanship.

My money's on Eric!

Oh really boys. Bless me with more of your intellect. What's your magic answer?

mine too!!!

Oh really boys. Bless me with more of your intellect. What's your magic answer?

Hey I thought we were on the Daily Herald, "what intellect"

truthhurts wrote:
woody wrote:
utocoman wrote:
Everybody Loves Raymond wrote:
al-Malaki was misquoted by the German leftist mag trying to boost Obama. This is not what he said. This is a non-story.

Pray tell convict. Please direct us to the correct quote? Make sure it is not on Rush/Sean sites. Those damn Germans never have recovered from their Nazi days have they Ray?

Here you go you stupid clown
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/07/20/iraq/main4275953.shtml

Now what will you come back with? Maybe nothing like most of your hate filled rants...
LOL. If you had read the whole article Woodrow (and Raymond), you would see that the German magazine is sticking to their guns. From the article you listed.

Today Der Spiegel said it was standing by the accuracy of its interview.

"A Baghdad government spokesman, Ali al-Dabbagh, said in a statement that SPIEGEL had 'misunderstood and mistranslated' the Iraqi prime minister, but didn't point to where the misunderstanding or mistranslation might have occurred," the magazine said, which also noted that several media organizations, including CBS, had pointed out the confusion or tepidness of the spokesman's rebuttal.

"SPIEGEL sticks to its version of the conversation," it said.

If I only had a dollar for every time a politician said he had been misquoted.

So a leftist agrees with a leftist Commie pro-Obama German mag? Why am I not surprised. Who am I to believe al-Malaki's own words or the words of a pro-Obama leftist rag. You folks are soooo predictable.

I say al-Malaki did not say he supported the Magic Obama's plan. You fools say prove it, I do prove it with a link from your own leftist news outlet and then you say you don't believe it. You can all kiss my white ass.

ThomasK wrote:
truthhurts wrote:
ThomasK wrote:
So you think your guy will bring us economic prosperity. Now that's funny. But then, know one has ever acused you of knowing anything about economics. Now what's in your drink?
That's a curious comment, Thomas, considering McCain has admitted that he knows little about economics and his campaign co-chair and chief economic adviser (until just a few days ago), Phil "Enron" Gramm, said that we are a nation of economic whiners and that we are only in a "mental recession." That's your boy McCain for you.

You have a difficult time paying attention. Now what was it I said earlier about both canidates? Never mind, Obama will make you rich. And you won't have to do anything for it.
What you said earlier? Oh, yeah, about you not liking either candidate. If that were true, one would expect you to do a fair amount of "McCain bashing" as well, but you don't, so I think we can dismiss that comment as self serving trash. You can't say you don't like either candidate but only bash one (Obama in your case) and have anyone take you seriously.

You are really an enigma Thomas. Most of the McCain supporters here are Bush supporters who refuse to admit that Bush has done anything wrong...anything at all. Raymond, woody, RushReader, they all fit that mold. If they could have four or eight more years of Bush himself, they'd take it. Wouldn't that be hell on earth?

You, on the other hand, admit that Iraq was a mistake from the get go and that the economy is a mess. You've also said in the past you agreed with the SCHIP bill that Bush vetoed, so you have issues with him there as well. Perhaps even more that I have not mentioned. McCain is not much different. In fact, I challenge you to show where McCain's positions on anything is significantly different than Bush's. Global warming perhaps, but that is about it.

You remind me of the guy who lives in a corrupt, crime infested neighborhood who does not like it but is afraid of change because it might be different. That's the point...it's supposed to be different.

Yes, you are quite an enigma. Or simply terribly confused.

Everybody Loves Raymond wrote:
truthhurts wrote:
woody wrote:
utocoman wrote:
Everybody Loves Raymond wrote:
al-Malaki was misquoted by the German leftist mag trying to boost Obama. This is not what he said. This is a non-story.

Pray tell convict. Please direct us to the correct quote? Make sure it is not on Rush/Sean sites. Those damn Germans never have recovered from their Nazi days have they Ray?

Here you go you stupid clown
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/07/20/iraq/main4275953.shtml

Now what will you come back with? Maybe nothing like most of your hate filled rants...
LOL. If you had read the whole article Woodrow (and Raymond), you would see that the German magazine is sticking to their guns. From the article you listed.

Today Der Spiegel said it was standing by the accuracy of its interview.

"A Baghdad government spokesman, Ali al-Dabbagh, said in a statement that SPIEGEL had 'misunderstood and mistranslated' the Iraqi prime minister, but didn't point to where the misunderstanding or mistranslation might have occurred," the magazine said, which also noted that several media organizations, including CBS, had pointed out the confusion or tepidness of the spokesman's rebuttal.

"SPIEGEL sticks to its version of the conversation," it said.

If I only had a dollar for every time a politician said he had been misquoted.

So a leftist agrees with a leftist Commie pro-Obama German mag? Why am I not surprised. Who am I to believe al-Malaki's own words or the words of a pro-Obama leftist rag. You folks are soooo predictable.

I say al-Malaki did not say he supported the Magic Obama's plan. You fools say prove it, I do prove it with a link from your own leftist news outlet and then you say you don't believe it. You can all kiss my white ass.
Prove it? All you "proved" is that an Iraqi spokesman said the following:

"But a spokesman for al-Maliki said his remarks "were misunderstood, mistranslated and not conveyed accurately."

http://www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/meast/07/19/almaliki.obama/

Nothing is said about what specifically was supposedly "misunderstood, mistranslated and not conveyed accurately", of course, just that they were. All you "proved" is that the Iraqi spokesman said he was misquoted, but won't say how he was supposedly misquoted. A pretty pitiful, tepid denial. Pretty vague and ambiguous if you ask me.

Like your pitiful reasoning skills. No wonder Bush was able to "prove" to you that Saddam had WMD's and was involved in 9/11.

Now as for your white a**, give it a big smooch for me. Shouldn't be hard....you see it everyday in the mirror when you shave.