waterhead wrote:
Is this what you guys do all day sit on this thing and boob. Blame Bush blame the church blame.........

I just thought this was a free way to read the paper. so how long has the herald been a liberal anti Mormon trash paper? I move out of state for a few years come back to find this. how sad. LONG LIVE BUSH

I could care less how long he lives. I just can't wait till he's out of office.

Oh happy day!!!!

leftintheuc wrote:
waterhead wrote:
Is this what you guys do all day sit on this thing and boob. Blame Bush blame the church blame.........

I just thought this was a free way to read the paper. so how long has the herald been a liberal anti Mormon trash paper? I move out of state for a few years come back to find this. how sad. LONG LIVE BUSH

Idiot-

If this forum does have a liberal bent-though, in actuality, it is really quite diverse-it is most certainly not reflected in the content of the paper itself. The editorial board, selected stories and commentary are, I assure you, right wing enough for your narrow mind to handle. Go back to your hole. Sleep well.

This guy is going to just love Raymond!

Sir John the Apostate wrote:
waterhead wrote:
Is this what you guys do all day sit on this thing and boob. Blame Bush blame the church blame.........

I just thought this was a free way to read the paper. so how long has the herald been a liberal anti Mormon trash paper? I move out of state for a few years come back to find this. how sad. LONG LIVE BUSH

I could care less how long he lives. I just can't wait till he's out of office.

Oh happy day!!!!



why, in a big rush to see the country go to a third world after your buddy Obama takes over and more than dubbles the taxes. with that and the cost for gas the lower class will be gone you will have only upper middle and upper classes. yep that will be something to look for I guess now i am going to go hug my bible and kiss my guns good night.

Time and time again, we see that every presidential candidate is closely related to European royalty, or to one of the other ones. In 2004 Harold Brooks-Baker, publishing director of Burke's Peerage, the encyclopedic bible of European aristocratic genealogy, said about the subject of US presidential candidates:

Brooks-Baker said there has always been a significant "royalty factor" in those who aspired to the White House, with Presidents George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Theodore and Franklin Roosevelt and Ronald Reagan among others all with strong blue blood links.

"The chance of winning certainly seems much higher with more royal connections and one could make a big case that royal genes or chromosomes will tell," Brooks-Baker said.

A common way of pooh-poohing the bloodline connections between presidents is to say the usual, everyone's related if you go back far enough. Not this closely related! Obama, according to various media outlets is Dick Cheney's 9th cousin, although Cheney's wife says that they are actually 8th cousins. She would probably be in a better position to know, wouldn't she? Hillary Clinton is also closely related to Barbara Bush and the queen demon herself, Elizabeth II of England. According to New England Historical Society genealogist Christopher Child, Obama's a 10th cousin once removed of George W. Bush, and McCain is a 6th cousin of Laura Bush. Note that Brooks-Baker said there has always been a significant royalty factor. This means that no election has ever been of the people and by the people. I understand people coming across this information for the first time might rightly be a little skeptical, but why is it that the ratio of people in positions of power belonging to secret societies like the Freemasons, Skull & Bones, and Knights of Malta is so high compared to those who are not? The Freemasons admit proudly on their own websites that most of the American presidents, royalty, leading businessmen, and heads of state are Freemasons.

Actually waterhead is right. When McCain pulls troops out of Czechoslovakia, we'll have plenty for a surge in Canada or Mexico or whatever country he wants to attack next.

We've seen what McCain thinks of veterans!

Considering that he is supposed to be this big war hero who endured five agonizing years of torture, it is impossible to reconcile this with the fact that he has consistently and viciously blocked every attempt by families of Vietnam POWs to get them back to the US. He has pushed through and amended legislation in order to block not only the release of information about POWs and MIAs that were still in Vietnam after the war, despite massive evidence of them being alive, but also the release of his own military records.

He comes across as being sympathetic to veterans who are being denied healthcare, who have to pay for their own meals at military hospitals while they recover from getting their arms and legs blown off, and how they have to wait for eons to get their benefits. But is McCain really speaking from his heart or a script? He has made it perfectly clear he isn't against torture, when he voted against a bill to ban it, as reported by the NY Times: The leading Republican presidential candidate, Senator John McCain of Arizona, a former prisoner of war who steadfastly opposes the use of torture, voted against the bill. Mr. McCain said the ban would limit the C.I.A.'s ability to gather intelligence. "We always supported allowing the C.I.A. to use extra measures," he said. Sprinkling in some doublespeak, he says that he believes torture is illegal and should be banned. Voted for the Military Commissions Act, which we are told applies only to enemy combatants. It permits trials without the accused present, gives the Secretary of Defense the power to appoint judges, allows evidence gotten without warrants, and makes it so lawyers cannot see their clients without government monitoring. Former Attorney General Gonzales has said that the president can strip Americans of their citizenship, turning them into enemy combatants, which makes it applicable to American citizens. Voted no to establishing mandatory rest periods for the troops between deployments, which would be a great help in reducing post traumatic stress disorder. Speaking of PTSD, McCain voted against a bill that would have provided $500 million for veterans mental health services like rehab and counseling. These are the actions of someone who hates veterans, not one who sympathizes with them.

About the only real difference between McCain and Bush is that one looks like Frankenstein and the other doesn't.