BLogan wrote:
Dubbs wrote:
Jaye wrote:
Dubbs wrote:
Wren wrote:
Dubbs wrote:
More from the Bible. Still beleive it's Satanic Wrenny? You ready to cry uncle?


17 I shall see him, but anot now: I shall behold him, but not nigh: there shall come a Star(Christ) out of Jacob, and a Sceptre shall rise out of Israel, and shall smite the corners of Moab, and destroy all the children of Sheth.


Ever hear of the star of David? The star of Bethelem?

You are cross minded, limpy. Quit yanking your angry itch and pay attention.

I said the heraldry was common to Christianity and paganism, and that Joseph Smith used it and symbols from Masonry.

He used symbols of Christ from the Bible you supposedly believe in, is what he did. (course you only read Romans)


Did you read all the scripture that related Christ to a star?

It is undeniable that this is a symbol of christ from the Bible, and that Christ himself symbolically used the star to desribe himself.


So the question becomes, how is that Satanic Big and Uncle?

I notice you both disappeared after I proved using the Bible it is a symbol of Christ. Cowards.

The inverted pentagram is not a symbol of Christ. And THAT is what we're talking about.

Again, so what are you saying the LDS church is using a satanic symbol Jaye? is that what your really saying?

listen up gumball, the LDS church clearly used satanic symbols on their temples and in their temple ceremonies themselves.

let's not forget the fact that Satan played a major role in Mormonism's secret temple ceremony, just ask somebody about the secret ceremony pre 1990 when they used this part of the skit to bash Christian ministers.

hateful scumbags

Only man turned the symbols into something negative, stars are used throughout scripture as a symbol of good and rightousness.

Dubbs wrote:
WaynesWorld wrote:
Dubbs wrote:
WaynesWorld wrote:
Dubbs wrote:
WaynesWorld wrote:
Dubbs wrote:
Wren wrote:
Dubbs wrote:
Wren wrote:
The term is used for both Satan and Jesus. You lose.
.

I see you have no proof of this, it is added to the your list....

1. Proof that the LDS church changed the 1835 version of scripture [b]Read the William E. McLellin PaPapers You can also look it up in Richard Bushman, D. Michael Quinn, and others. You will have to read books, Dubbs, not just web sites.

2. Proof that the LDS church finish your sentence, Dubbs


3. Proof of scripture that "morning star" is also meant as Satan. And given below (again)

And the list grows....


Yes it does, for you, Dubbs.

What is real is that the "Morning Star" is a term used for both the Christ and Satan, as is heraldic symbols used both in Christianity and other religions. http://www.ccg.org/english/s/p223.html


Yes, we saw what some nutjob bible thumping website said, but what is their proof in scripture? NONE.BWAHHH HAAA HAAA HAAA HAAH!

You sure do make the forum fun, Dubbsie.
Earlier today you posted an image from Gerald and Sandra Tanner's website. HAA HAA HAA HAA HA!

What a ham you are!

As I said, the Scumbag Tanners probably stole the pictures it from the LDS website anyway, so big whoop.The LDS church is kinda' like what you did just did.

Me and Sir John aren't good enough but our money is. (we encourage you to send it in the name of some other family member).

HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HAAA!

Whenever I'm blue, I think of that and it makes me smile!


wanna translate that into english? I don't speak gibberish.We've discussed this before.

Some ex-members are counseled, when they are ex'd that they can not pay tithing....but are encouraged to do so in the name of an active family member. Remember?

Ok, not sure what all that had to do with the conversation here today about the Tanners and the Stars on the temple. But ok. You used information from people you call blood-sucking pigs. Why trust them?

It's like the tithing. The church tells you you are immoral and thus unfit to be a member. But they encourage you to send them your money.

Why trust an ex members money? Who knows how they get it... stealing, gambling, pimping, extortion, etc. A filthy person's money is filthy. A church should not want a thing to do with money earned in an unethical way. get it now??

BLogan wrote:
Dubbs wrote:
WaynesWorld wrote:
Dubbs wrote:
WaynesWorld wrote:
More symbolism as seen in tarot card images and readings.

Get your free reading today, Dubbs.

http://www.fourthdimension.net/thoth/

Devils workshop.Afraid of some little ol' cards Dubbs?

No, afraid of letting satans spirit in my home.

what's the problem Dubbie, as I remember you Mormons believe he is your spirit brother.

As he is yours

Wren wrote:
Dubbs wrote:
Wren wrote:
Dubbs wrote:
Wren wrote:
The term is used for both Satan and Jesus. You lose.
.

I see you have no proof of this, it is added to the your list....

1. Proof that the LDS church changed the 1835 version of scripture [b]Read the William E. McLellin PaPapers You can also look it up in Richard Bushman, D. Michael Quinn, and others. You will have to read books, Dubbs, not just web sites.

2. Proof that the LDS church finish your sentence, Dubbs


3. Proof of scripture that "morning star" is also meant as Satan. And given below (again)

And the list grows....


Yes it does, for you, Dubbs.

What is real is that the "Morning Star" is a term used for both the Christ and Satan, as is heraldic symbols used both in Christianity and other religions. http://www.ccg.org/english/s/p223.html


Yes, we saw what some nutjob bible thumping website said, but what is their proof in scripture? NONE.

That you don't like it doesn't mean a thing, simply that you refuse to accept the facts. That's your problem, not anyone else's. You have lost this discussion. Read on . . . it may help you.

So why is Lucifer a far bigger problem to Mormons? Mormons claim that an ancient record (the Book of Mormon) was written beginning in about 600 BC, and the author in 600 BC supposedly copied Isaiah in Isaiah's original words. When Joseph Smith pretended to translate the supposed 'ancient record', he included the Lucifer verse in the Book of Mormon. Obviously he wasn't copying what Isaiah actually wrote. He was copying the King James Version of the Bible. Another book of LDS scripture, the Doctrine & Covenants, furthers this problem in 76:26 when it affirms the false Christian doctrine that "Lucifer" means Satan. This incorrect doctrine also spread into a third set of Mormon scriptures, the Pearl of Great Price, which describes a war in heaven based, in part, on Joseph Smith's incorrect interpretation of the word "Lucifer" which only appears in Isaiah.
http://www.lds-mormon.com/lucifer.shtml

Tough luck. It is your scriptures that overthrows your argument. Tough luck.


Wait, Satan and Lucifer are different in your eyes? I'm confused what this post has to do with our conversation

Thanks to all today for continuing to show that Dubbs can't even argue intelligently or post material that supports even minimally his arguments.

1. Yes, the "morning star" is a title and symbol for Lucifer in the Bible, even as mangled by JS in his own scriptures.

2. Dubbs goes to his nature when he starts swearing and foulmouthing people when he loses his arguments.

Dubbs is a stain on the LDS Church's reputation.

Dubbs brings shame on his family, particularly his mother, who had no idea that when she first held him that he would become the dark and loathsome character we get to enjoy each day on the Forum.

Once again (and forever), shame on you Dubbs for referring to your wife as a "slut" and all the terrible names you have called others.

We will be here long after you flee this site.

Dubbs wrote:
Sir John the Apostate wrote:
Dubbs wrote:
Sir John the Apostate wrote:
Dubbs wrote:
Sir John the Apostate wrote:
Dubbs wrote:
KitKat wrote:
Dubbs wrote:
KitKat wrote:
Dubbs wrote:
KitKat wrote:
Dubbs wrote:
Wren wrote:
Dubbs wrote:
Mental Health Care wrote:
Dubbs wrote:
Betzz wrote:
Dubbs wrote:
Betzz wrote:
Wren wrote:
Dubbs wrote:
Wren wrote:
Let's end this part of the discussion right here

Dubbs wrote:Course how would an uneducated redneck know anything about research? Obviously you and Uncle buck come from the same ignorant mold."

This perfectly describes JR or Uncle Buck, .

I concur.You mutilated the post. You are the redneck and biased beyond reason.

Ignore him, Wren, he's just having a hissy fit like he usually does when he realizes he's been an idiot. Tomorrow he'll be back to his usual name calling instead of changing other peoples posts.


funny cuz Wren was doing this same thing a few weeks, ago, but the hypocrite sisters said nothing then. Typical.

No, what is typical is that you are the one that started it, you little douche bag. Don't give me the ole' he started it because he didn't.

Oh, and did you realize that I wasn't freakin' talking to you??? Heh, silly question. Of course not!

Ask me if I care who you are talking to, I dare you.

I didn't start it, Wren did. The POINT hypocrite sister is you say nothing when others do it. Get it whenchy?

Dubya

From your behaviour here, as of late, I can see that we have done you a serious disservice by taking you off your medications. If you don't want to go back to your medications, I have no other choice than to continue with your shock treatments and you know how badly you react to the rubber bite guard we have to use to keep you from gnashing your tongue to bits. Please, I beg of you. For your own sanity, come back, come back!

Another Wren moniker change.

Naw, not me, but it is (1) funny and (2) accurate in that serious mental health intervention would help you tremendously, Dubbs.


Riiigggghtt.


When your offline, he's online, and vice verca.

Wren
Hits 5558
Online Status ONLINE


--------------------------------

Mental Health care


Online Status OFFLINE


BUSTED!!!!
Sorry.. You're wrong. I know that much for a fact.


Oh so it's You? YOu did come on just after HC left. Thought you didn't do that Kitkat?
Nope, isn't me either. I have only ONE moniker. I've never been anything other than KitKat. And, I was online most of the day yesterday, I just wasn't posting. Silly boy!

So why are you protecting those who are creating monikers? Tell us the person who is doing this, I would guess it's Wren or Big.
Nope, it's neither of them. Keep a guessing cause I'm not telling. Protecting? Mental Health Care doesn't need protecting from anyone or anything. And besides, why should you care? You still refuse to admit you were TBM. You were TBM. And everyone knows it! Your denials just make you look silly.

who cares really, I know it's some idjit here and I know most everyone creates monikers, that you protect them and encourage it by knowing and not calling them out is just as bad.

That's rich coming from the Apostate Collective.



I thought you all were the apostate collective?

Nope the Apostate Collective consists of Dubbs AKA TBM AKA Dubya AKA utocoman etc etc.



So your dieing to get in on our group by naming yourself Apostate?

Actually if you think back a ways. You assigned me that title. Since your never wrong. I had no choice but, to add it to my moniker.

Buy the way do we take this as a admission, that your part of that group?



BUSTED

Oh, I'm an apostate alright, apostate from the Bible thumping nutjob religions such as Wren and Blogans, Yours and Uncles, Grizz and Exmoroberson, Utoaconman, those types I am an an apostate all day long and twice on Sundays.

But Sirs I must point out. That the Collective has no idea what religion I, Do or don't belong to.

I could be your worst nightmare. The guy sitting serenely next to you in sacrament meeting!!!!!