Dubss wrote:truthhurts wrote:
This thread discusses the Content article: Documents raise questions about religious influence
"My best thinking often occurs in conversation where people feel comfortable in trying out new thoughts and challenging each other's ideas," Leavitt wrote. "We occasionally recorded them to free ourselves from note taking. These were private conversations among friends."
New thoughts and challenging each others ideas, huh? If that is what he wanted, he should have invited folks from other religions (or no religion) to his little study sessions and studied their material as well. I don't consider a bunch of Mormon politicians meeting to discuss the Book of Mormon and D&C
as "trying out new thoughts and challenging each other's ideas."
The discussions included how to communicate the lessons in a "bilingual" manner to a non-Mormon audience.
So, kinda like missionary discussions?
Leavitt said during the meetings that they were not official state business and asked staffers to keep the discussions confidential.
Gee, I wonder why? 
You really need to get out of Utah. 
You seem to be stuck on that phrase, Dubby. You said the exact same thing to someone else on another thread yesterday. Have you hit the point where that and "dar, dar, dar" are all you are capable of without plagiarizing?
Happy New Year, Dubs. May you make more sense in 2008 than you did in 2007. I don't see how you could do any worse, but you'll probably find a way.
