Whose "we" Einstein?

Ha ha! with that grammar I am pleased to discount you as part of the group!!

utocoman wrote:
Whose "we" Einstein?

Ha ha! with that grammar I am pleased to discount you as part of the group!!
If you are so smart, why don't you post correctly so that we know who you are responding to? Sheesh!

utocoman wrote:
Whose "we" Einstein?

Ha ha! with that grammar I am pleased to discount you as part of the group!!

I'm glad you were able to let go of your only friend Mr Happy, so you could get that one out. Now you two run along and play with yourself.

You going to the caucus tonight? Didn't even know there is one, did you? Demwit. Don't even know your precinct and where they meet, do you? Guess what dorcuss? I know my precinct and who is interested in running. I know them personally. They are good friends of mine. I'm supporting them even though I'm a registered Republican. I'm not a blind fool like you.

You're a pathetic blowhard that is clueless. You're one of those doofusses that when they walk into the room everyone turns away.

ThomasK wrote:
utocoman wrote:
Whose "we" Einstein?

Ha ha! with that grammar I am pleased to discount you as part of the group!!

I'm glad you were able to let go of your only friend Mr Happy, so you could get that one out. Now you two run along and play with yourself.

You going to the caucus tonight? Didn't even know there is one, did you? Demwit. Don't even know your precinct and where they meet, do you? Guess what dorcuss? I know my precinct and who is interested in running. I know them personally. They are good friends of mine. I'm supporting them even though I'm a registered Republican. I'm not a blind fool like you.

You're a pathetic blowhard that is clueless. You're one of those doofusses that when they walk into the room everyone turns away.

Thomas, with that kind of post it sounds like you're taking over for Dubss! You know, with the silly name calling that sounds like a 12 or 13-year-old is writing it!

Decaf wrote:
Just thought I'd breathe some fresh air in to the stale atmosphere of cynic's paranoia and discontent

Enjoy

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,114684,00.html

Ah, Decaf, nice of you to grace us with a four year old bunch of Republican fluff and puff from Fox News, and I would not be at all surprised if they got their figures from good old Donny Rumsfeld himself. Gee, that brings back memories. Back in March 2004 some people still actually thought there really were WMD's somewhere in Iraq. Imagaine that. Some people maybe even still thought Bush had a clue too. And we only had a total of 600 or so dead US troops then. 4,000 dead US troops now. Has Fox News been reporting that?

But I digress. Lets take the issue of Iraq's health care. Here's is a piece of supposed data from your article

"240 hospitals and most of Iraq's 1200 clinics have reopened. 70 private hospitals are operating."

Depends on how one defines "opened", I guess. Maybe "opened" means the doors aren't locked. And as for Doctors, that is another story. Here is something more current, from this January.

LONDON, Jan 16 (Reuters) - Iraq's healthcare is in disarray with doctors and nurses fleeing abroad and child death rates soaring, according to a report on Wednesday.

Up to 75 percent of Iraq's doctors, pharmacists and nurses have left their jobs since the U.S.-led invasion in 2003. More than half of those have emigrated, the report by health organisation Medact said.

"The health system is in disarray, not only because of the underlying security, but owing to the lack of an institutional framework, huge staff shortages, intermittent electricity, unsafe water supply and frequent violations of medical neutrality," the report, "Rehabilitation Under Fire", said.

Iraq has only around 9,000 doctors, giving a ratio of six doctors to every 10,000 people. By comparison, the ratio in Britain is 23 to every 10,000...

http://www.reuters.com/article/latestCrisis/idUSL16828588

75% of the doctors, pharmacists and nurses in Iraq have flown the coop. That's progress, Decaf. Bush progress.

Better get some fresh air, Decaf. This post of yours was really stale.

JLD wrote:
Five years after the globalist firing of Saddam, it remains the most dangerous city, in the most dangerous country on earth

Where did you get that? What constitutes the "most dangerous". I'm not saying it isn't dangerous, just the opposite. But given what is happening in Africa, just to name a place at random, I don't think Iraq is the most dangerous place on earth. I could be wrong though.If you're a terrorist intent on striking America and your in Iraq, yes, Iraq is the most dangerous place on earth.