Wheelchair users are taking their fight with taxi companies to a federal appeals court.

Cab drivers in Salt Lake City often refuse to pick up people in wheelchairs, who get referred by dispatchers to a private ambulance company, which has agreed to provide the service for no more than regular cab fare.

But advocates for the disabled want to force taxi companies to outfit vans that usually are part of their fleets with lifts or ramps and provide their own service. They say the Americans with Disabilities Act requires it.

It's one of the hearings the Denver-based 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals will hold when it travels to Salt Lake City and Provo for four days this week to hear arguments in 72 criminal and civil cases.

Since the filing of the taxi case, Salt Lake City enacted an ordinance requiring taxis to accommodate people in wheelchairs. That's when the three licensed cab companies arranged for the service to be provided by Gold Cross Services Inc., which takes calls for three specially equipped vans.

"We each donated a meter," said Bruce Jackson, an owner with his brother of City Cab Co. and a defendant in the suit brought by Utah disability activist Barbara Toomer.

"I think that's all been settled," Jackson said of the lawsuit. When informed of a Wednesday hearing at the University of Utah law school for the appeal, he gave Toomer's group, the Disabled Rights Action Committee, credit for perseverance. But he added, "I don't know what their point is now, anyway."

The point is that the Americans with Disabilities Act required cab companies to provide lift or ramp devices with every new van they acquire for their fleet, said Rick Armknecht, an attorney for the Disabled Rights Action Committee.

A taxi lawyer will argue that "new" means a brand-new vehicle, not the used vehicles that taxi companies typically acquire for service. Armknecht rejects that interpretation, saying "new" means any model year after the 1990 enactment of the Americans with Disabilities Act.

The federal courts have yet to resolve this question, although U.S. District Judge Dale Kimball in Salt Lake City sided with City Cab Co.

"The issue comes down to the meaning of the word 'new,' " Armknecht said. "It's amazing that it comes down to that. Whether wheelchair users have access to taxi cabs will depend on the court's interpretation of 'new.' "

Chris De La Mare, community relations director for Gold Cross Ambulance, said it doesn't get a lot of calls from people with disabilities, but stands ready to provide the service anywhere in Salt Lake County for regular cab fare.

"We do not make any money on it," he said. "There hasn't been a lot of demand, so we've been able to handle it."

In another case before a three-judge appeals panel, former American Stores Co. executive Robert P. Hermanns, who spent much of his career in Utah, is suing for $282,662 a year in retirement benefits that Albertson's Inc. revoked after it acquired American Stores.

Hermanns's hearing is set for this afternoon at the Brigham Young University law school.

Albertson's cited a contract Hermanns had signed prohibiting him from working for a competitor. Hermanns joined Associated Grocers of Seattle when it didn't compete with Albertson's, but when other acquisitions took Albertson's into Washington state, it held Hermanns in violation.

"It was fundamentally unfair," said Stellman Keehnel, an attorney for Hermanns, now an independent business consultant. Hermanns collected only two of 20 years of benefits and is suing Albertson's for the rest -- more than $5 million.

An arbitrator and a federal district judge in Salt Lake ruled against his claim, sending Hermanns to the appeals court.

10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals calendar: www.ck10.uscourts.gov/circuit/calendars/Mar06cal.pdf