Abortion Rally_C
Pro-choice demonstrators Susan Witka, left, and Renay Davis held up hangers at a counter-demonstration to the fourth annual Walk for Life rally and march in San Francisco, Calif. on Saturday, Jan. 19, 2008. The anti-abortion event drew several thousand supporters and attracted a smaller group of pro-choice counter demonstrators. The two groups held rallies near the Ferry Building then marched along the waterfront to the Marina Green. (AP Photo/San Francisco Chronicle, Paul Chinn) **MANDATORY CREDIT FOR PHOTOGRAPHER AND S.F. CHRONICLE, NO SALES , MAGS OUT**

Monday, 21 January 2008
Orem lawmaker ponders abortion notification bill Print E-mail
DAILY HERALD   

Orem lawmaker ponders abortion notification bill

Joe Pyrah

There isn't much room left to tighten down Utah's abortion laws, but Steve Sandstrom is willing to give it a shot.

The Republican representative from Orem is mulling a bill that would bring parents into the decision-making process even if a minor was to use what's known as the "judicial pass" process. That is supposed to guarantee that a minor can use the court system to get an abortion without parental approval in the event of abuse, incest or danger to her life.

But the court rules also say that a judge can determine if a minor is mature enough to make the decision herself.

"To me that still opens the door for a minor to have an abortion," Sandstrom said. It also, he claims, opens the door for groups like Planned Parenthood to guide minors through to unneeded abortions.

He met with the Administrative Office of the Courts late last week to see if a rule change would do the trick, but the courts are bound by their own strict rules, and he determined a bill would be necessary. That doesn't mean that it will come up in this year's legislative session, which begins today. If it's not ready to pass "constitutional muster," he's willing to take it into interim meetings over the summer.

"This is a bill that I want to make sure is done right," he said. "If it's not done right we could do more harm than good."

What Sandstrom wants "done right" is further consideration of parental rights when a judge is considering the abortion rights of their daughter. He said he's in favor of the judicial pass law in cases of incest, danger to the life of the mother and if parents have a recorded history of abuse.

"Beyond that, I would like to make it so that a minor child could still go before a judge, but their parents also get before the state court and make the case for why their daughter should not have an abortion."

As the legal rules are written, courts are forbidden from notifying parents of a decision to allow or deny a minor an abortion. And that's the way it should be, according to groups like Planned Parenthood. They say that bringing parents into the judicial pass process violates confidentiality guaranteed by law. They also say that a better use of resources is to teach minors about prevention.

It's not as if there were a rash of minors trying to sneak abortion past their parents. According to the Administrative Office of the Courts, four girls had cases in 2006 and three were allowed in 2007.

Those numbers are irrelevant, says Sandstrom, who believes that one "unnecessary" abortion is too many.

"I don't think we should play the number games on something like this," he said.

Article views: 763  
User Rating: / 1
PoorBest 
No Comments.

Discuss this article on the forums. (0 posts)

Last 6 Days - Our Towns

Sorted by popularity

Wednesday, 27th of August 2008
Tuesday, 26th of August 2008
Monday, 25th of August 2008
Sunday, 24th of August 2008
Saturday, 23rd of August 2008
Friday, 22nd of August 2008
Mentoring of America LLC Sales Help Wanted
RN/LPN Trinity Mission Health and Rehab of Provo
RN Office Team Lead Alpine Home Care Orem
Graphic Artist The Daily Herald
Therapist Heritage School
Physical Science/Life teacher Provo Canyon School
Aids Pleasant Grove City

See All Top Jobs Post your job
Generated in 2.25401 Seconds