Wednesday, 26 March 2008
Judge rules against use of fifth amendment in DUI case Print E-mail
Daily Herald   

Jeremy Duda

Daily Herald

The fifth amendment gives people the right not to talk to the police if they're arrested. It gives them the right to not testify against themselves in court. But unfortunately for a Springville man, it doesn't give people the right to refuse a sobriety test.

Fourth District Judge Claudia Laycock ruled against the use of the fifth amendment to refuse a sobriety test on Wednesday at a pretrial hearing for Robert Vandyke, whose trial on a felony DUI charge begins on April 7. Vandyke's defense attorney, Shelden Carter, filed a motion several weeks ago asking that prosecutors be prohibited from mentioning Vandyke's refusal to take several sobriety tests during the trial.

Laycock cited a previous case from Sandy, saying the fifth amendment applies only to speech. Utah law grants people the right to refuse a sobriety test, but anyone who refuses can be stripped of their driver's license.

Vandyke, a 42-year-old Springville resident, was pulled over in Spanish Fork in September by a police officer who was responding to a report of a drunk driver near a sports park. The officer said Vandyke smelled of alcohol and refused a sobriety test.

Vandyke is charged with felony DUI and driving on an alcohol-restricted license. The DUI is a third-degree felony because he has been convicted of drunk driving offenses five times in the past 10 years. He spent five years in prison for killing a West Valley City woman in a drunken wreck in 2000.

Article views: 430  
User Rating: / 0
PoorBest 
Discuss (2 posts)
what goes around Mar 26 2008 22:11:44
This thread discusses the Content article: Judge rules against use of fifth amendment in DUI case

It is people like him who need the proverbial book thrown at them. Apparently, his years in prison didn't teach him anything.
#359407
The Keeper Mar 27 2008 13:03:06
Laycock cited a previous case from Sandy, saying the fifth amendment applies only to speech. Utah law grants people the right to refuse a sobriety test, but anyone who refuses can be stripped of their driver's license.

Just a wild guess, but Sandy City got it from the US Supreme Court?

Schmerber v. California, 384 U.S. 757 (1966), held that a State could force a defendant to submit to a blood-alcohol test without violating the defendant's Fifth Amendment right against self- incrimination. We now address a question left open in Schmerber, id., at 765, n. 9, and hold that the admission into evidence of a defendant's refusal to submit to such a test likewise does not offend the right against self-incrimination. South Dakota v. Neville, 459 U.S. 553 (1983).
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=459&invol=553
#359430


Discuss this article on the forums. (2 posts)

Last 6 Days - Our Towns

Sorted by popularity

Sunday, 11th of May 2008
Saturday, 10th of May 2008
Friday, 9th of May 2008
Thursday, 8th of May 2008
Wednesday, 7th of May 2008
Tuesday, 6th of May 2008
MIDWAY BY OWNER Brand Real Estate Other County
3bd 2ba home, on 11 Lots and Acreage
SPRING FEVER Bring Your Toys Recreational Property
Orem Instant equity! Beautiful home. Real Estate Provo/Orem
Payson Zero Down! 3bd 2ba Real Estate South County
foreclosures Distressed & HUD Homes. Real Estate South County
Cedar Hills 3,954 SF, home Real Estate North County

See all Top Homes
Generated in 0.56395 Seconds