Friday, 28 March 2008
Same-sex attraction meeting canceled Print E-mail
Janice Peterson - DAILY HERALD   

An American Fork High School PTA meeting was canceled hours before it was set to begin Thursday, after officials learned that the discussion would involve gays and lesbians.

Alpine District spokesman Rhonda Bromley said the meeting was canceled when the school's principal found out the agenda concerning "serious social problems" would include both pornography and same-sex attraction. The principal, Carolyn Merrill, was uncomfortable holding the meeting without prior research and background information on what stance would be taken, Bromley said.

Bromley said Merrill attended several planning meetings in previous months, but the item was never brought up. Merrill only found out what the full agenda was after reading an article in a newspaper Thursday about the night's meeting.

"The principal of American Fork High School was not aware of what the agenda of the meeting was," Bromley said. "She thought the meeting was strictly about pornography."

Bromley said the decision to cancel the meeting was supported by the regional and state PTA offices, and it was not made with any agenda in mind. The meeting was not canceled because the school is against talking about same-sex attraction, Bromley said, and all students at every school are accepted.

"We the district, as well as American Fork High School, are not taking a stand," Bromley said.

Steve Graham is a co-founder of Standard of Liberty, a group based in Utah County whose mission includes defending conservative, religion-based social values. Graham was one of the planned speakers at the meeting.

Graham said the meeting would have been ground-breaking because few PTAs are willing to present what he considers the truth about the "gay agenda." Graham said he believes Merrill, the principal, has known for months what would be on the agenda, and she canceled the meeting because she supports gay rights.

"She's got a convenient lapse of memory, that's what it is," he said.

In an e-mail to supporters, Graham said he believed members of the Utah Pride Center had convinced officials to cancel the meeting, and free speech was being abridged as a result.

Yana Walton, director of communications for the Utah Pride Center, a group that advocates protection of gay rights, said she was glad the meeting was canceled because her group was refused the opportunity to present an alternate view. Walton said she would have supported a meeting in which parents had the opportunity to receive information about resources for them and their children.

"We just wanted to be there to offer parents the accurate information," she said.

Had the meeting not been canceled, Walton said, misinformation and hateful speech would have been presented, which would be harmful to students.

Walton said her group wanted to be present at the meeting because of the concern that same-sex attraction was being presented as a social problem. Gay and lesbian students are often subject to hostility at school and at home, Walton said, adding that hostility should not be promoted by an adult group meant to protect them.

"You are labeling children and students," she said. "Gay or not, they are students of that school."

Walton said it is important for parents to have accurate information, rather than fear-based rhetoric. Several parents contacted her office about the meeting, even parents whose children are not gay, she said. The parents were concerned about the message the meeting would send, she said, and she felt that information on Graham's Web site showed the negativity that would have been presented. According to its Web site, Standard of Liberty is "an LDS-oriented educational corporation which exists to raise awareness of sexual activist movements overrunning America's Christian-moral-cultural life and to inspire the public will, families, and individuals to counteract these trends."

"I feel that some of his speech is not compassionate, and I don't think it makes these students feel respected or valued or loved," she said.

Article views: 1,891  
User Rating: / 8
PoorBest 
Discuss (28 posts)
Wren Mar 30 2008 13:17:40
This is exactly me. I believe in telling the story with the facts available. I don't shade it based on my own bias. I didn't like Waj nailing the other guy with hateful words, then accusing the other guy of being hateful. Thus, Waj caught a dose of what he did, and guess what -- he started crying like a little baby.

TK, I am the nicest guy around, but I can't tolerate rudeness and emotional nonsense from others. Those who have known me for some time around here will tell you that I believe in critical thinking skills and am almost never emotional in what I discuss here. Objectivity should guide our discussion, not bias and hatred.

If we disagree on something, we can disagree agreeably, can't we?

That is all I am asking from anyone and everyone -- the same playing field.
#359785
waj Mar 30 2008 15:25:43
Wren,
I was simply pointing out the inaccuracies in his stories as well as the fact that he was trying to insinuate that gays are pedophiles. Pedophiles are exactly that. Pedophiles. When people bring the word pedophile up in the same sentence as gay or homosexual the intent is to link the two in the mind of the reader/listener. This has been done for years in an attempt to vilify all gays across the board.
In your reply to TK you tried to convey how nice and kind you are yet your reply to me was far more rude and accusatory then mine was to eldstenorge. I simply pointed out that he was using buzz words that cause people to fear and thus hate because they are so inflammatory, as I stated above. I suggest you re-read what I wrote to him and then re-read what you wrote to me. You made a far more personal attack on me while trying to prove what a good fair minded guy you supposedly are. It seems I am not the only one on here who thought that. Maybe your not as nice as you think you are.
I am surprised you would use words such as “it is you guys who need to be watched” and “homo-freak” when in the same discussion you say about your brother “I am quite open with this issue. My beloved brother has had a partner for eleven years, and I like them both fine. The partner is a neat guy. And I accept them where they are at, not where others think they should be”. Seems quite contradictory to me. I would think you would stick up for your brother when people make insinuations or blanket statements about him or who he is and who his friends are.
Sure, we can disagree but I will not let people continue to use tactics that make all homosexual people look like pedophiles and sexual deviants just because that is what they have been taught either directly or indirectly. I have seen and experienced this first hand both as a member of the dominant religion here and as a gay man. You, however, apparently have experienced neither.
#359792
Wren Mar 30 2008 16:07:08
You are in denial, Waj, and you are defending your indefensible attitude that you can do what the other guy did then accuse him of being hateful. I gave you your own medicine. I will do it again if necessary.

My brother is quite bothered by the hatred that those of same-sex attraction use against their opponents as much as he is by those who are gay haters. He believes that it makes it harder for gays and lesbians to gain full acceptance.

Be nice, Waj, be nice. Please don't act like WRZ or Dubss did here. We on the forum don't need it.
#359795
waj Mar 30 2008 16:30:26
Be nice? I don't see that I have not been. Who use the words "homo-freak?"
I agree with your brother in that there is a very extreme side of the gay population that is hateful and mean just as they accuse others of and it does make it harder for homosexuals who just want to live a peaceful life and be accepted and loved as quality productive citizens.
That being said, I will continue to call people on their biases and inflammatory remarks as I would any honest person would do.
The thing I find funny and somewhat condescending is how you act like you are standing by ready to "discipline" ("I gave you your own medicine. I will do it again if necessary." those who write things that you don't agree with or that you perceive as mean. Did the Herald give you moderator authority? It comes across as arrogant. People won't want to discuss issues with you if you threaten and act like you are about to spank them like a child!
Be nice and don't be condescending towards people who are simply standing up for themselves.
#359796
Wren Mar 30 2008 17:51:53
You are being condescending. I will let it go for now, and will respond accordingly to your behavior.

Let's agree to disagree agreeably.
#359802
There are too many comments to list them all here. See the forum for the full discussion.

Discuss this article on the forums. (28 posts)

Last 6 Days - Our Towns

Sorted by popularity

Friday, 29th of August 2008
Thursday, 28th of August 2008
Wednesday, 27th of August 2008
Tuesday, 26th of August 2008
Monday, 25th of August 2008
Sunday, 24th of August 2008
Administrator Oncology department Central Utah Clinic
Mens Volleyball coach UVU
Web Master/Developer Watson Alliance Realty
Receptionist/Office Clerk Career Step
Technical Support Career Step
Phlebotomist American Red Cross Lewis and Clark Region
CNA/ Hospice/ Home Care Life Paths Hospice and Home Health

See All Top Jobs Post your job
Generated in 2.04414 Seconds