Sunday, 30 March 2008
cannon e-verify 0330 Print E-mail
Daily Herald   
Yes! Improved system is a step forward

Chris Cannon

For too long, the federal government has asked employers to use a broken system to verify someone's immigration status. We all agree that if someone knowingly hires a person here illegally, the company should be penalized and individual deported. But, under the previous system, both the federal government and employers were stuck using a system that didn't work to satisfy the public demand for enforcement while leaving employers liable even when they used that system.

E-Verify was born out of this chaos and while not perfect, has the potential to revolutionize employment verification and solve many of the ancillary issues surrounding illegal immigration.

The previous program, called the "Basic Pilot Program," was an Internet-based system where an employer checks a new hire's name and Social Security number against a government-run database to make sure the name and number match.

The new E-Verify system fixes many of the flaws in the Basic Pilot Program. E-Verify works by allowing participating employers to electronically compare employee information taken from the Form I-9 (the paper-based employment eligibility verification form used for all new hires) against more than 425 million records in the Social Security Administration's database and more than 60 million records in federal databases. Results are returned within seconds.

Some argue that the system will still return too many "no match" indicators and immediately cast suspicion onto otherwise lawful Americans. This concern is legitimate, but manageable. According to government figures, where E-Verify has been used, 93 percent of employers' queries are instantly verified as work-authorized and only 7 percent come back as tentative no-matches.

Also, enforcing the law will have a chilling effect on illegal applicants. Anecdotal evidence suggests this is already happening, and that, as use of the system spreads, non-matches drop drastically. Finally, employers may not take any action against an employee because he/she contests the information mismatch. Innocent until proven guilty is still a bedrock principle in America. Only now, we will hopefully be able to dramatically reduce the time needed to determine eligibility.

In an effort to bring E-Verify up to its potential, I will soon introduce in Congress the "E-Verify Extension and Expansion Act of 2008." This bill will allow for biometric technology to reduce fraud and prevent identity theft. It will also reduce the number of documents accepted as verification of status from 24 to 7. Only the most fraud-resistant and difficult to obtain will remain. It will also create a uniform system of verification so no state can circumvent the ID requirements.

None of this is to say that concerns about an E-Verify system do not remain. A government database of information on Americans gives me a chill no matter how well-intentioned. Ensuring there are sufficient safeguards against that information being used for any reason other than verification and immigration/deportation proceedings is vital.

E-verify is a first step. But we must keep the pressure on to make sure it actually works in the real world. If employers are provided a level of protection from selective prosecution when they use the system, then this voluntary program will be used by 100 percent of legitimate businesses. With incentives, businesses will embrace E-Verify, allowing law enforcement agencies to focus their resources on those willfully violating our laws and not the people trying to comply.


• Chris Cannon represents Utah's 3rd District in Congress.

Article views: 557  
User Rating: / 2
PoorBest 
Discuss (9 posts)
WatchDog Apr 03 2008 15:58:03
What a line of BS and Double-Speak! It must be election time, that's what this must be about. Chris, you are not fooling anyone.

Your argument to this point has been that the EVerify system was flawed, and generated too many erroneous no-match letters to be acceptable. Now, you are going to sponsor a bill making it mandatory? Give me a break! You don't mind if I don't believe you, do you? I hope not, for I surely do not.

EVerify has been around voluntarily for some time. It ALWAYS has had a 90 day grace period to protect citizens, get their surname updated because they got married, or some such, which generated the no-match. It has ALWAYS had protection against misuse. The ONLY people that should fear EVerify is the illegal aliens looking for our jobs, and of course, the greedy employers willing to look at a forged SSN and ignore the fact that it is a fake.

Your comment about government databases of citizens bothers you, bothers me! IT WAS YOU WHOM VOTED FOR THE PATRIOT ACT WITHOUT READING IT, RIGHT? Right!

I am going to have to go back and re-listen to my copy of your MALDEF award speech, where you were awarded for your support of criminal illegal aliens. Remember, where you said that you felt that Utah citizens don't care whether illegal aliens are here or not?

Do you really think we don't understand what you are doing?

Where do I find a copy of this supposed bill, by the way? This I have to read! Also, by claiming to introduce this bill, what do you mean by "soon"? Before or after the upcoming election?

You must think we are sooooo stupid!
#360251
The Keeper Apr 03 2008 16:29:22
This bill will allow for biometric technology to reduce fraud and prevent identity theft. It will also reduce the number of documents accepted as verification of status from 24 to 7. Only the most fraud-resistant and difficult to obtain will remain.

What "biometric technology" would that be? The REAL ID Act national identity cards being pushed on Americans by your globalist friends?

If employers are provided a level of protection from selective prosecution when they use the system, then this voluntary program will be used by 100 percent of legitimate businesses. With incentives, businesses will embrace E-Verify, allowing law enforcement agencies to focus their resources on those willfully violating our laws and not the people trying to comply.

You're joking about 100% voluntary compliance, right?

How about implementing these incentives for not verifying: stiff fines and jail time!
#360255
EWL Apr 03 2008 17:03:33
Chris's proposal will protect employers and also grant due rights to those who do come here legally and deserve the protection of our federal government. I am happy to see immigrants coming legally to the United States and obtaining opportunities for work and acceptance that they deserve. The e-verify protects legal immigrants from prejudices and stereotypes and Chris is proposing to improve the system by making it more efficient.
#360260
WaynesWorld Apr 03 2008 17:25:30
What drives me mad is how so many of us complain about the illegals and then buy the best product at the lowest price when we shop regardless of its origin.

The majority of us complainers don't care if the products we buy were from illegal immigrants in America or from slave labor shops in Asia supplying for Wal-Mart and its competitors.

While government can help, they are not where to place the blame. To do that diminishes our power to do something about the problem and also is to fool ourselves.

Will I pay even an extra 25% for goods made through businesses that deal only with reputable suppliers, suppliers who pay their non-illegal employees fairly?

Time to shoulder the blame for this mess. We as citizens have a lot power to remove the threat of illegals in our society. However, I doubt 1 in 100 of us complainers and blamers have the will.
#360264
The Keeper Apr 03 2008 17:25:43
EWL wrote:
Chris's proposal will protect employers and also grant due rights to those who do come here legally and deserve the protection of our federal government. I am happy to see immigrants coming legally to the United States and obtaining opportunities for work and acceptance that they deserve. The e-verify protects legal immigrants from prejudices and stereotypes and Chris is proposing to improve the system by making it more efficient.

And how does "improve the system" if it is a voluntary process?
#360265
There are too many comments to list them all here. See the forum for the full discussion.

Discuss this article on the forums. (9 posts)
Sales Person Low Book Sales
Military Docupak
Office Administrative Support Mentoring of America LLC
Newspaper Delivery Person The Daily Herald- classifieds/employee ads
Inbound Technical Support $10.50/hr Teleperformance

See All Top Jobs Post your job
Lehi Condo! $142,000! Better than Real Estate North County
Land Bargains! 30% DISCOUNT Through Recreational Property
Orem NE Great Location!! 2200sf! Real Estate Provo/Orem
Orem - Move In & Real Estate Provo/Orem

See all Top Homes List your property
Generated in 0.33440 Seconds