Sunday, 11 May 2008
Herald Poll: HERALD POLL Print E-mail
Daily Herald   

Our recent Herald Poll on polygamy included these responses:

Thank you for your sound arguments and well-presented article. It's refreshing amid the plethora of sensationalism that usually surrounds polygamy stories. Polygamy does not equal child abuse. Polygamy should definitely be decriminalized.

• M. Watson,

Lehi


I do not recommend its practice, however it never seemed rational to me that polygamy (polyandry or polygyny) among totally voluntary, non-coerced consenting adults (over 18 years) be illegal, especially in a society that now openly tolerates adultery and homosexual behavior. On the other hand, rooting out and prosecuting sexual and other physical child abuse of any kind should be aggressively pursued to the full extent of the law. Further breaking child abuse laws should carry more severe, mandated punishment than similar adult laws due to the inability of the victims to protect themselves.

• Ed Trammell,

Provo

I can't understand why the public is so incensed with polygamists while they openly tolerate all kinds of immoral practices otherwise. Polygamy should be legalized as an affirmation of the freedom of religion upon which this country was founded and has long held as a human right. Legalization could help overcome welfare fraud and the type of sexual abuse caused partly by the follower's seclusion and closed community. I am aghast at the legal overkill going on in Texas. I can feel the heartbreak of the parents and children clear up here.

• Glenna Dennett,

Orem

We need to listen to experiences, experts and escapees that correct the victimizing folklore of "consenting adults" and "polygamy doctrine."

Polygamy "was an incident, never an essential" (Talmage); an "experiment" (Stanley S. Ivins); "cultural artifact" (Todd Compton); "not an eternal principle" (Eugene England); "not one of doctrine but of history" (John A. Widtsoe); "seems to corrupt civil society ... education, individual rights and the rule of law" (Naomi Schaefer); "the major factor responsible for poverty, corruption, illiteracy and diseases" (CAPWONA). "I think it is not doctrinal. It's not legal" (Gordon B. Hinckley). "Private choices are not private; they all have public consequences" (James E. Faust).

• Curtis Henderson,

Spanish Fork

Article views: 189  
User Rating: / 1
PoorBest 
Discuss (6 posts)
Dubbs May 11 2008 16:17:37
DEBATER wrote:
This thread discusses the Content article: Herald Poll: HERALD POLL

===


"ANTI-POLYGAMY CONSPIRACY" THINLY VEILED IN THE POLLS AND ELSEWHERE


BTW,

Mental health workers rip CPS over sect
Staff complains agency traumatized kids, disregarded mothers' rights


Available at:
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/headline/metro/5770183.html





Good for Texas, now if we could get Utah and Arizona to do the same. End the madness of perverts and the women that have been brainwashed to not understand they are abusing children.
#367167
DEBATER May 11 2008 17:07:28
==

Continuation

If a [FLDS] polygamist woman has 18 children, she is vilified as: brainwahsed, incompetent, dependent-zombie, incapable, or feeble minded,

If a monogamous woman has 18 children....

Compare

Fuller house: Arkansas mom pregnant with 18th child


http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/24537885>1=43001


==
#367175

Betz
May 11 2008 18:27:11
DEBATER wrote:
==

Continuation

If a [FLDS] polygamist woman has 18 children, she is vilified as: brainwahsed, incompetent, dependent-zombie, incapable, or feeble minded,

If a monogamous woman has 18 children....

Compare

Fuller house: Arkansas mom pregnant with 18th child


http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/24537885>1=43001


==


Wrong . . . I think she is brainwashed, incompetent, dependent-zombie, incapable and feeble-minded as well.

Just curious though . . . aren't polygamous women monogamous as well? I mean, a woman only gets one husband, don't they?
#367185
DEBATER May 11 2008 19:02:58
==


POLYGAMISTS ARE "RELENTLESS ENEMIES OF CATHOLICISM WITH PROTESTANT-EVANGELICAL CULTS"


Available at
http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/61471



=
#367186
DEBATER May 11 2008 19:12:39
==


On the other hand,



THE "ANTI-POLYGAMY FALLACY AGENDA" IS TO RE-ENACT THE (1870) FEDERAL CULLOM BILL

Available at:
http://www.geocities.com/rre5/SENATOR_RAID.html



DISCLAIMER: Continuation of my literary work/efforts...fact/fiction...
quasi-fact/quasi-fiction...draft...outline...etc.


Authorship/Moral Rights: Debater


==
#367187
There are too many comments to list them all here. See the forum for the full discussion.

Discuss this article on the forums. (6 posts)
Generated in 0.10013 Seconds