Tuesday, 13 May 2008
MEDIA VOICES: Carbon tax needed Print E-mail
Daily Herald   

From the Washington Post, Monday, May 12, 2008:

The dismal April car sales data out of Detroit illustrated an important lesson about what it will take to reduce U.S. consumption of foreign oil and to cut greenhouse gas emissions. With the reality sinking in that high gas prices (already more than $4 per gallon in some places) are here to stay, American car buyers ended their nearly two-decade love affair with the sport-utility vehicle and other gas guzzlers. Overall sales at the Big Three automakers were way down compared with figures from April 2007 -- and the drop was driven by plummeting sales of light trucks and SUVs. Chrysler's Jeep Commander SUV dropped 49 percent. General Motors' Chevrolet Tahoe fell 35 percent. And Ford's F-series pickup trucks declined 27 percent.

Meanwhile, fuel-efficient cars were rolling off the lots. The Big Three automakers saw increased sales in cars with high gas mileage, as did Toyota, which had an overall sales gain of 12 percent over April 2007. The Toyota Prius notched a 54 percent increase.

Had Congress the courage to impose a price on carbon, these positive changes could have been achieved years ago -- and without the side effect of pouring fresh money into the government coffers of Iran, Venezuela and Russia. Instead, the financial squeeze at the pump brought on by global increases in oil prices finally brought about the change in behavior in the driving public that could not be achieved by appealing to citizens' better natures. The next attitude adjustment should come in Detroit, where the free fall of bottom lines ought to prompt a decisive shift away from the production of SUVs and other gas guzzlers.

With a carbon tax, the price of gas might be even higher than it is now. But as we have seen, high prices encourage less driving and a demand for more efficient vehicles and energy alternatives, which result in reductions in carbon dioxide emissions. More important, the billions generated by a carbon tax could help fund projects that would reduce U.S. dependence on petroleum imports from unfriendly or unstable countries. Yes, we know: A carbon tax is a non-starter on tax-averse Capitol Hill. But with debate on a cap-and-trade bill from Sens. Joseph I. Lieberman, I-Conn., and John W. Warner, R-Va., starting next month, some price on carbon may be coming. Finally.

Article views: 140  
User Rating: / 0
PoorBest 
Discuss (1 posts)
megus May 13 2008 18:53:14
This thread discusses the Content article: MEDIA VOICES: Carbon tax needed

And your saying this is all good, right?

Why???

Just because you've bought into the idea that man is the cause of increased temperatures doesn't mean your right.

Why is it that we get upset with higher prices, but it's OK to increase those prices if it's somehow going to a government fund?

And the end results might just end up with some other solution like the ethanol one that is actually contributing to higher pollution instead of less.

Oh well, as long as it sounds like your doing something, that's all that matters, right?
#367411


Discuss this article on the forums. (1 posts)
Inside Display Retail Sales Representative The Daily Herald
Classifieds Inside Sales Representative The Daily Herald
Graphic Artist The Daily Herald
Mentoring of America LLC General Help Wanted
District Manager Assistant The Daily Herald
Indepentent Contractor Delivery The Daily Herald
carrier The Daily Herald

See All Top Jobs
SF 4bd, 2ba, 2000 sf Real Estate South County
3bd 2ba home, on 11 Lots and Acreage
BRING YOUR TOYS! Summer Recreational Property
Restaurant for sale in the Business For Sale
Cedar Hills 3,954 SF, home Real Estate North County
Orem + Berkshire By owner Real Estate Provo/Orem

See all Top Homes
Generated in 0.47088 Seconds