Wednesday, 14 May 2008
Growth will force a lake bridge Print E-mail
Daily Herald   

'Not in my backyard" attitudes have plagued cities across the nation for years, and they're beginning to wreak havoc in Utah Valley, especially when it comes to building needed east-west roads.

Lehi fought tooth and nail against a 2100 North freeway connecting the Mountain View Corridor to I-15. Officials and residents didn't want it in their backyard. They complained it would divide their community and bring in noisy and dangerous traffic. The Utah Department of Transportation finally compromised, and committed to cutting the width of the road in half, making it an expressway of two lanes in each direction, with traffic lights along the way.

 

It's a pipsqueak compromise that won't put a significant dent in Utah County's long-range transportation problem. Space has been left to expand the compromise road, but to do that UDOT will have to start from scratch with a new environmental study, new hearings, and all the other rigmarole associated with highway construction. And that means that a bigger highway won't be built for many years to come, when it will be far more painful, if it's even possible.

Whatever UDOT's reasoning, we are sorry it gave in. Lehi's NIMBYs are identical to those in many cities across America who have blocked the construction of a needed freeway only to discover, too late, that snarled traffic and the attendant costs of lost time, wasted gas and added pollution have hurt the livability of their community.

Lehi's unfortunate refusal to accept the project will prove to be one of the more nearsighted episodes in the city's history. One day, not so far in the future, sheer growth will force the construction of new corridors, and they might not fall in ideal places.

By 2040 the Cedar Valley area is expected to grow to a quarter-million people, with only 17 percent of wage earners heading north for work. The employment connection for the vast majority will be Utah County, a fact that boldly underscores the desperate need for more east-west routes.

Here's an interesting comparison: Salt Lake County has a dozen east-west corridors of five to seven lanes each from it's western areas. Utah County has only two east-west arteries -- that's right, two -- from Cedar Valley. They are Lehi's Main Street (S.R. 73) and Santaquin's Main Street (U.S. 6). And Lehi is already clogged.

Now imagine that measly two-lane compromise that Lehi forced on Utah County trying to handle tens of thousands of vehicles from Cedar Valley a mere 15 years from now. What comes to mind is an image of hardened arteries and heart failure. That is the gift to the next generation from Lehi's NIMBYs.

If there are any environmentalists who cheered the downsizing of the 2100 North proposal, they should now recognize that it will only hasten the construction of an east-west bridge across Utah Lake -- likely from Pelican Point on the west shore to the Orem-Vineyard area.

It's true that the environmental challenge of a lake crossing will be significant, but all those questions will eventually be answered and a bridge will be built. Heavy growth in Cedar Valley is going to force the issue. A bridge will cut the long loop around the top of the lake to a mere 8 miles, which will save fuel and reduce air pollution. You can bet that a lake bridge will be heavily used even if it's a toll road.

This undertaking will cost something like $500 million -- in line with other highway construction. A $3 toll could bring in $35 million annually to pay for it.

Household growth sufficient to fully justify a lake bridge is just 15 years off, and that time will flash by in a heartbeat. So the government studies currently under way are timely. We are eager to see their findings on this and the other inevitability: a freeway running south through Cedar Valley and connecting to I-15 in southern Utah County.

The unstoppable reality is that Utah County will have a million inhabitants in 25 or 30 years, and we owe it to the next generation to plan now. We want Utah Valley to continue to be recognized as one of the best places to live in America.

Article views: 1,397  
User Rating: / 12
PoorBest 
Discuss (13 posts)
WaynesWorld May 14 2008 23:17:43
The author of this article seems just proud as can be to be salivating, - drooling in anticipation of the time he can witness yet another sick accosting of Lady Nature in the false name of human need.

Just who wrote this opinion anyway?
#367623
Pittakos May 15 2008 00:27:05
WaynesWorld wrote:
The author of this article seems just proud as can be to be salivating, - drooling in anticipation of the time he can witness yet another sick accosting of Lady Nature in the false name of human need.

Just who wrote this opinion anyway?

I suppose the same could be said of the home you live in. But... I would disagree that human needs do not trump pristine nature. After all, we (humans) are a part of nature and we have learned how to design structures that blend in with nature or are just as artistic as nature. That said, I am not in favor of this bridge but it is for purely economical reasons.
#367639
WaynesWorld May 15 2008 01:30:02
Pittakos wrote:
WaynesWorld wrote:
The author of this article seems just proud as can be to be salivating, - drooling in anticipation of the time he can witness yet another sick accosting of Lady Nature in the false name of human need.

Just who wrote this opinion anyway?

I suppose the same could be said of the home you live in. But... I would disagree that human needs do not trump pristine nature. After all, we (humans) are a part of nature and we have learned how to design structures that blend in with nature or are just as artistic as nature. That said, I am not in favor of this bridge but it is for purely economical reasons.
Yeah, I hear what you are saying - yet, I remain strongly opposed to a bridge for green reasons in light of

(1)Utah Lake has been exploited so many times over for human needs, why don't we continue to stop polluting it and allow the Lake time to get back to more of its natural state. The beauty of the lake (in time) is something that cannot be purchased for any amount of money. Building a bridge is not a step in that direction.

(2)The population numbers presented were projections. Hey! I got an idea! Why not build places where people can work on the west side of the lake where they'll live... how novel, don't you think?

(3)Gas prices are $$$ and still skyrocketing; war wages over oil-resources in the middle east; greenhouse predictions and unnatural weather patterns are repeatedly warned to us; people die in so many automobile related accidents every year it is unreal; car insurance costs a lot of money; automobiles cost big $$$; we've become an obese society; air pollution along the Wasatch front is as bad as anywhere in the nation according to some figures during the winter....

How many more hints does the common person have to be subject to before he falls out of love with his "freedom" granted by the automobile? There are better means for essential transportation!

I would hope people that build over there aren't so brazen to suppose that a bridge will be easily forced upon the rest of us.
#367646
bddefense May 15 2008 19:40:23
I remember going over to Jacob City (ghost town) one fine summer day and on the way back stopping by the housing developments on the west side of Utah Lank when they just getting started - and thinking to myself "There is no way I would live over here unless I was a telecommuter - there is no access".

Who wants a commute like that? I've never understood one's desire to live on the west side of Utah Lake when east/west access is so poor.

To the west side proponents of a bridge... Did you not happen to notice the small 13 mile wide 24 mile long lake and one two lane road running out to the west side communities?

A bridge across Utah Lake? HA HA HA HA HA... Whatever man. Freaking go around. Or develop your economic base so you don't need to commute... there seems to be a great knack for residential development with no foresight regarding where people are going to work and how they will move from point A to point B and back again.

Growth is coming and nothing will stop that - but to think that building a bridge across Utah Lake is the solution to east/west traffic flow problems, well that is just the reasoning of a simpleton and is certainly not looking at the bigger economic and environmental picture.

But hey, everyone that lives on the west side of Utah Lake must know something I don't. It's beautiful over there, isn't it? And enjoy that commute of yours!
#367752
oversonla May 16 2008 23:30:59
Mayor Billings and the other 20 or so people who rode their bikes on "Ride your bike to work day" have the right idea. To reclaim our right to clean air we need to think shorter commutes and cleaner commutes. As for population growth--won't that be controled by water availability. I think the Big Dogs like LA and LV will twist whatever rivers are necessary to keep the water coming in to their real estate. I heard one lady on the radio say that no one in California (she may have meant Southern California) should have a lawn. That's a bold statement, but it's made me wonder if I should fill my front yard with dwarf fruit trees instead of the water hogging grass that is in place now--and that's in Orem--where the city fathers have provided wisely for water for its citizens in the future--and changed the outdated "green-lawn" law. A man in the Macey's parking lot said to me that I must be glad to be driving my VW Bug now with the gas prices so high. Actually, I have checked the bus routes to work, but I would have to walk under the freeway at 800 North in Orem. Like a lot of other folks, I really am interested in making things better here. It hurts to hear how bad our air is. Brigham Young is reported to have counseled his people to protect their most valuable resource, clean air. I AM glad we have some leadership at the state capitol where foreign waste seems to have been stopped at the border. The control over what comes in needs to be constantly monitored by an active citizenry. It could truly get worse. I don't think a floating bridge would be all that bad. It would take a more educated person than myself to project all the ramifications though.
#368055
There are too many comments to list them all here. See the forum for the full discussion.

Discuss this article on the forums. (13 posts)
Generated in 0.11147 Seconds