I would like to point out why Provo's new ethics ordinance should be passed, if the right changes are made. The proposed changes seem to address the problems encountered when you have a councilman who is also a real estate developer. Since the council is a part-time position those elected have the right to make a living, but because of a council person's unique position of authority and influence there need to be appropriate safeguards. One of the main duties of the council is to guide and approve development. Therefore some interactions of a councilman/developer need to be limited to avoid a clear conflict of interest.

A councilman/developer, or his family members, should not be lobbying other council members to change the rules for his own profit. A third party should argue the merits of the proposed development before both the Planning Commission and the council.

As far as interacting with the city's 500-plus employees, he should be able to work with them as would any other developer, except for any employee who's hiring was directly approved by the council, like the department heads.

As for Councilman Turley, I don't see how the above changes to our ethics laws would prevent him from making a living as a roofing contractor, or investing in and developing real estate.

•Dave Knecht,

Provo