Thursday, 26 June 2008
Salem City doesn't want to get stuck with the check Print E-mail
Lana Creer-Harris - SPANISH FORK PRESS   

Nobody wants to be invited to a party and get stuck with the check. The Spanish Fork (SF) interlocal sewer agreement caused Salem City council some concern. Spanish Fork wants sewage treatment for 400 homes at the Salem city sewer plant to accommodate development on the far southern end of Spanish Fork's boundary and one across Arrowhead road in Salem. Salem city council didn't want SF to get the benefit of added hookups and Salem end up with high costs of worn out sewage treatment equipment. Southern Utah Valley Municipal Waste Association, a consortium of cities intends to put a sewage treatment facility near Utah lake and all member-city sewage would be treated there. This is ten years down the road, but figured prominently in council consideration of costs of the agreement.

Salem City Engineer Bruce ward presented the agreement to the council. He admitted nobody knows "how fast SF will gobble up these 400 units." But added Salem is gaining impact fees in the pact. The shortest distance from the new development is to the Salem plant. Spanish Fork takes care of their own lines and the fee structure for SF should cover O and M. Council was concerned that the increased flow would have an adverse impact on Salem's equipment. Councilman Hanks was leery of the agreement and the wear and tear on Salem's infrastructure. Ward assurred them ownership of the plant will stay entirely with Salem. When the vote came; Councilman Hanks voted nay, Durrant, Green, Ficklin and Gordon all voted aye. The agreement passed.

Salem continues to expand. The council held a hearing and voted on the Mark wright annexation at 000S and 1200W. Farmers and residents from the Leland area of Spanish Fork attended, as the land under consideration was theirs or bordered on theirs. Junior Baker, City attorney stated agricultural use by the present owners could continue as the land is rezoned and annexed under a "grandfather" clause. Should landowners sell to someone who does not run stock, they reacquire the land they would have forfeited the right to run stock as there was a break in the continuous use. However, should a land owner, sell their stock seasonally and buy more at a later time, that would still be covered by the grandfather clause and they would still be able to keep animals on their property. The council passed this annexation request.

Rental rates for the community center have not been set and it will be next council meeting before the requirements and contract provision are re-written and accepted by the council. Rates and times of use will be finalized then. The use of alcohol is prohibited in public parks and because the community center is part of a public park, alcohol is not to be served at functions there. Some renters have broken this law and Salem Police will increase their oversight of functions to curtail this illegal activity. At the next meeting, the council will set how much or for how long people can rent the center.

Article views: 50  
User Rating: / 0
PoorBest 
No Comments.

Discuss this article on the forums. (0 posts)

My Groups

You are not a member of any group.

Newest Groups

Operations Research Analyst / Process Owner Im Flash / Micron
Inbound/Outbound Sales Mentoring of America LLC
Classifieds Manager The Daily Herald
Unknown General Help Wanted
Centennial Bank Banking/ Finance Help Wan
RN/LPN Trinity Mission Health and Rehab of Provo
Great Career Move Mentoring of America LLC

See All Top Jobs Post your job
Generated in 0.10737 Seconds