Thursday, 03 July 2008
Eagle Mtn. bribe hearing delayed Print E-mail
Jeremy Duda - DAILY HERALD   
Charges against former councilwoman amended

 

A preliminary hearing for former Eagle Mountain City Councilwoman Linn Strouse was postponed Wednesday after prosecutors realized they had filed the wrong charge against her.

Strouse was initially charged with failing to report a $10,000 loan from land developer and Eagle Mountain founder John Walden. But the law that requires public officials to report large loans or gifts within 10 days does not apply to city council members, according to Deputy County Attorney Chad Grunander.

 

Strouse is now charged with use of office for personal benefit. Both crimes are second-degree felonies.

"It's the more appropriate charge. It's the charge that applies to Linn Strouse as a council member," Grunander said. "The facts are still the same."

Under the new charge, prosecutors must show that Strouse was influenced in her position as a city council member by the loan, or that it was given as a reward for an action she had already taken.

Another aspect of the charge would be whether Strouse used her position to advance her economic interests or obtain special privileges. The new charge does not require her to have reported the loan.

Ron Yengich, Strouse's attorney, said the new charge is essentially a bribery statute.

"This statute requires a higher level of proof. It requires an actual quid pro quo," he said.

Yengich said he does not believe Judge Samuel McVey would have found there was enough evidence against Strouse for trial on the original charge if the preliminary hearing had gone forward on Wednesday.

Grunander said he plans to meet with Walden, Yengich and others to discuss the possibility of resolving the case without going to trial.

"If we're comfortable with the level of accountability she would be willing to accept, then absolutely we'd love to resolve it short of trial. But we're prepared, of course, to take it to trial," he said.

Grunander said there has been no discussion of any criminal charges against Walden.

"There is nothing in our information that shows any bit of bad faith whatsoever on the part of Mr. Walden. He appeared to be a friend," he said.

After Strouse was charged in September, Walden issued a statement saying she and her husband requested the loan so they could finish the basement of their home.

"Some time after Linn Strouse's late husband, Dave, was diagnosed with terminal cancer, Linn and Dave discussed with me their concerns about losing their home, and asked for my help," Walden said in his statement.

The next hearing in the case is scheduled for Aug. 11.

Strouse was defeated in her re-election bid in November. She was elected to serve a two-year term in 2001 and was re-elected to a full term in 2003. She also served as mayor pro tem for about three weeks, October-November 2006, after Mayor Brian Olsen resigned.


Jeremy Duda can be reached at 344-2561 or This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it

Article views: 1,327  
User Rating: / 4
PoorBest 
Discuss (3 posts)
U.Know.I.Know Jul 03 2008 16:15:26
This thread discusses the Content article: Eagle Mtn. bribe hearing delayed

This article is a bit confusing. A loan is a loan. A bribe is a bribe. So which is this? Perhaps it is neither?

The county attorney states "There is nothing in our information that shows bad faith on the part of Mr. Walden......" Well, Mr. Walden is out and about bribing people, is not that illegal?

Mr. Walden says he is innocent - Mrs. Strouse states she is innocent. Mr Grunander can not seem to decide what law if any that Mr. Walden or Mrs. Strouse has broken. Perhaps Mr. Grunander should just wipe the egg off his face and forget his own private agenda against Mrs Strouse. That would give him more time to look after the real crooks. I just read a few days ago that the County Attorney's office has an over load of work.

Mrs. Strouse is an honest woman that has always done the right thing for the people that she has served. She deserves an award not to be harrassed by idots.
#377622
Stephen Delphi Jul 19 2008 23:07:45
I can only hope that at some point soon John Walden will likely be charged with attempted bribery and he and David Lifferth will hopefully face civil charges of conspiracy to file false charges and defamation.

Grunander said there has been no discussion of any criminal charges against Walden.

"There is nothing in our information that shows any bit of bad faith whatsoever on the part of Mr. Walden. He appeared to be a friend," he said.


Appears to be a friend???? How interesting, this entire statement from the county prosecutor is. It would be useful to know if/and the amount of money donated by Walden for the County Attorney's political campaign.

If Grunander would make the slightest effort at an investigation, he would find that Walden showed significant bad faith. All he needs to do is investigate among many other things, the episode in the Mayors office with Linn Strouse to discover the potential crime of extortion on the part of Walden.

It is a material fact that Walden made his assertions to the County Attorney PRIOR to the charges being filed, not after. He was no friend. He and David Lifferth were doing whatever they could to prevent Linn Strouse from being reelected to the Eagle Mountain City Council. These were two shameless thugs who mercilessly heaped all this trouble on a widow who was striving to serve the citizens of her city.
#380681
MGWorthen Sep 16 2008 14:18:46
There is no requirement in the law for city council persons to report a loan even though the big liars in Eagle Mountain know it wasn't a loan anyway. The idiot county attorney is now trying to say that Strouse was bribed, but in the same breath he says that John Walden, the accuser/briber was a good friend of Strouse and showed no effort to make a bribe. How can a person be bribed without a briber? Just look into how much money Walden donated to the county attorney's election campaign and that will help everyone understand what's going on here. Walden threatened Strouse that he would destroy her when she was mayor if she didn't do what Walden demanded. She didn't and Walden and his lapdog David Lifferth set to the work of destroying her with the aid of their "bribed" county attorney. That is the truth that reporters could find, but instead they blabber what they are spoon fed by the county attorney, Walden and that schmuck, Lifferth. I know you are thinking that I've tried to hold back here, but really, there is so much more that could be said.
#393715


Discuss this article on the forums. (3 posts)
Generated in 0.11470 Seconds