john warner mub_c
Sen. John warner, R-Va., left, accompanied by Sen. Joseph Lieberman, I-Conn., center, and Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., right, laugh during a news conference on Capitol Hill in Washington, Friday, June 6, 2008, to discuss the environment and climate change. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)

Saturday, 05 July 2008
Senator suggests lower speed limit might mean cheaper gas Print E-mail
H. Josef Hebert - THE ASSOCIATED PRESS   

WASHINGTON -- An influential Republican senator suggested Thursday that Congress might want to consider re-imposing a national speed limit to save gasoline and possibly ease fuel prices.

Sen. John Warner, R-Va., asked Energy Secretary Samuel Bodman to look into what speed limit would provide optimum gasoline efficiency given current technology. He said he wants to know if the administration might support efforts in Congress to require a lower speed limit.

Congress in 1974 set a national 55 mph speed limit because of energy shortages caused by the Arab oil embargo. The speed limit was repealed in 1995 when crude oil dipped to $17 a barrel and gasoline cost $1.10 a gallon.

As motorists headed on trips for this Fourth of July weekend, gasoline averaged $4.10 a gallon nationwide with oil hovering around $145 a barrel.

Warner cited studies that showed the 55 mph speed limit saved 167,000 barrels of oil a day, or 2 percent of the country's highway fuel consumption, while avoiding up to 4,000 traffic deaths a year.

"Given the significant increase in the number of vehicles on America's highway system from 1974 to 2008, one could assume that the amount of fuel that could be conserved today is far greater," Warner wrote Bodman.

Warner asked the department to determine at what speeds vehicles would be most fuel-efficient, how much fuel savings would be achieved and whether it would be reasonable to assume there would be a reduction in prices at the pump if the speed limit were lowered.

Energy Department spokeswoman Angela Hill said the department will review Warner's letter but added, "If Congress is serious about addressing gasoline prices, they must take action on expanding domestic oil and natural gas production."

The department's Web site says fuel efficiency decreases rapidly when traveling faster than 60 mph. Every additional 5 mph over that threshold is estimated to cost motorists "essentially an additional 30 cents per gallon in fuel costs," Warner said in his letter, citing the DOE data.

Article views: 444  
User Rating: / 1
PoorBest 
Discuss (6 posts)
Everybody Loves Raymond Jul 07 2008 18:56:13
Just more socialist mind thought control. If I have the gas to drive 75 mph, why shouldn't I? If I can afford it, let the socialists drive their wind powered unicycles or whatever.
#378205
utocoman Jul 07 2008 19:08:42
That's right Ray, take what you can and leave the others without. A true Republican't!
#378210
prisonpig Jul 07 2008 19:14:09
Well Ray it looks like you, Woody, Stupid reader, and all the rest of the neocons have been living the good life for several years now with boy George in office, but come January, your day will end and you'll have to conform or leave the U.S. You decide. I personally can't wait. BTW, I signed the Dennis Kucinich impeachment petition. I just wish this had been done several years ago!
#378212
leftintheuc Jul 07 2008 20:14:19
Every 10 mph over 60 you drive is like paying 54 cents per gallon more for gas you bought at 3.25/gallon.

See: http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/driveHabits.shtml
for tips.
#378240
Wren Jul 07 2008 20:33:15
Everybody Loves Raymond wrote:
Just more socialist mind thought control. If I have the gas to drive 75 mph, why shouldn't I? If I can afford it, let the socialists drive their wind powered unicycles or whatever.

You are a poor excuse for a conservative.

You probably think your school district is a socialistic device from hell.

Have you not heard of the "social compact." It means that sometimes one sacrifices for the good of all.

And conservation of energy is a good thing. Tell me how unfettered corporate capitalism is going to help us in this matter.
#378258
There are too many comments to list them all here. See the forum for the full discussion.

Discuss this article on the forums. (6 posts)
Generated in 0.18937 Seconds