0817_BW Wildfire_01
Ralph Daniel knows a wildfire will someday bolt toward his home in Mission Canyon, Calif., near Santa Barbara. Illustrates WILDFIRES-3 (category a) by Bettina Boxall (c) 2008, Los Angeles Times. Moved Wednesday, Aug. 6, 2008. (MUST CREDIT: Los Angeles Times photo by Brian Vander Brug.)

Sunday, 17 August 2008
WILDFIRES: Life at nature's edge can be in harm's way Print E-mail
Bettina Boxall - Los Angeles Times   

Sometimes when Ralph Daniel lookso out the huge plate-glass windows of his 1959 ranch house, a bobcat stares back at him from the patio. He delights in the quiet, the bird songs, the expansive view of the Santa Ynez Mountains. 

 

Like millions of other Californians, Daniel, 63, likes to live on nature's edge. He is a 10-minute drive from both downtown Santa Barbara and Los Padres National Forest. But he has no illusions. One day he expects to see a wildfire bolt through the chaparral and down the slopes toward his house on the fringes of Mission Canyon. "That's where I think it's going to come from," he said, pointing to a ridgeline from a seat on his patio.

When it does, getting out could be a nightmare. Like many rustic communities in the West, Mission Canyon is a maze of narrow, twisting roads, dead-end drives and too few exits.

 

About 40 percent of the more than 12 million homes in the state are on land with a high to extreme threat of wildfire, according to the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. Most of them are not in the boondocks, but in developed areas bordering wildlands -- places like Mission Canyon, Malibu, Sierra Madre, Santa Clarita.

Every year, more houses go up in what is known as the wildland-urban interface, where development meets the flammable wild.

An analysis by U.S. Forest Service and University of Wisconsin researchers found that between 1990 and 2000, 61 percent of the new housing in California, Oregon and Washington was built in the interface.

In southern California alone, the Forest Service estimates that roughly 189,000 homes were constructed in fire-prone areas from 2003 to 2007.

In the 1960s, an average of 100 structures a year were destroyed by wildfire on lands protected by state firefighters. In the 1990s, the figure topped 300. In this decade, wind-driven firestorms have pushed the average past 1,500.

The toll will only get worse, said Bill Stewart, a former assistant deputy director of Cal Fire. "We build with wood, and we have hot, dry winds. There's no house you can say has a zero chance of ever burning."

The escalating destruction has sparked new state construction standards as well as a growing recognition of the limits of firefighting.

Some argue it is time for bolder steps: Curb building in areas of high fire danger. Close national forests to the public on days when the Santa Ana winds howl. Bury power lines in the backcountry so they don't topple in fierce winds and spark infernos, as happened last October.

Wildfires are not natural disasters, said Tim Duane, an associate professor of planning at the University of California, Berkeley. "They are natural processes that become disasters because of human decisions. ... Why was the subdivision there? Why was it spread out the way it was?"

Mission Canyon has been a retreat for Santa Barbarans since the Spanish colonial era. The nearby mission dammed its creek for water. Locals hiked and picnicked on its slopes and established a botanical garden. After World War II, hundreds of homes were built there.

Daniel, a psychologist, grew up in the New York area, went to graduate school in the San Francisco Bay Area and moved to Santa Barbara in 1985, drawn by the ocean and the weather. Five years later, in a foothill neighborhood a few miles west of Mission Canyon, he encountered a less alluring side of southern California.

Pushed by local winds known as sundowners, the Painted Cave fire raced from the mountains to the 101 Freeway in a couple of hours. It jumped the highway and wiped out more than 600 buildings -- including three homes near his.

Daniel and his then-partner lived on a cul-de-sac next to county parkland. They watched 15-foot flames run through the grass.

"As we were packing the car, all of a sudden the fire was on us, so we got the hell out of there," he said. The streets were clogged with bumper-to-bumper traffic. "Everybody was fleeing and going downhill in all lanes. Nobody could go uphill. No fire engine. And that's what's going to happen here."

In a 2005 research paper, Thomas Cova, an associate geography professor at the University of Utah, posed a question: Should places like Mission Canyon have population limits, just as movie theaters have occupancy limits to ensure everyone can escape in an emergency?

His study, published in the journal Natural Hazards Review, includes two aerial photographs of upper Mission Canyon. One, taken in 1928 shows a scattering of trees, an orchard, four houses and two main routes in and out.

The second, taken decades later, shows abundant landscaping and houses packed together. More than 400 homes were using the same two ways out.

After his research was published, he received e-mails from all over the West. "People's genuine concern is that they moved into a canyon that wasn't too populated 20 years ago and they can't stop the development," Cova said.

Newer subdivisions are required to have wider roads and better access for fire engines than Mission Canyon does. But Cova said planning regulations around the country pay scant heed to the number of people who will have to use exit roads in a wildfire.

He grew up in the San Francisco Bay Area. His career has been shaped by the 1991 Oakland Hills fire, which destroyed nearly 3,000 structures and killed 25 people in a matter of hours.

He vividly remembers the wide band of flames roaring through eucalyptus trees, the news accounts of victims: The family that burned to death in their pickup truck. The teenage girl who became disoriented in the smoke.

Later, in graduate school at the University of California, Santa Barbara, Cova chose wildfire evacuations as his thesis topic. Was Oakland an isolated situation? he wondered. He studied the Santa Barbara area because its mountainous backdrop has a fiery history: the Refugio blaze in 1955, the Coyote in 1964, the Sycamore in 1977 and the Painted Cave in 1990.

"Some of these fires were enormous and very violent, but there were no homes in the area where the fire occurred. But now the homes are out there."

The West, Cova found, is studded with scenic firetraps. "There are literally thousands of fire-prone communities ... with a static road network and steadily increasing housing stock," he wrote in his 2005 journal article. "In most of these areas the likelihood of an extreme fire is increasing." Jenny Cushnie has called Mission Canyon home for more than 30 years. She didn't think about fire when she arrived. "I came here from Switzerland and before that from Scotland. Fire was not an issue," she said. "Mold was."

In 1977, the 805-acre Sycamore fire erupted a few miles away, burning more than 200 buildings. Then at a canyon barbecue about 15 years ago, a Santa Barbara County fire official gave a talk.

He said a wildfire racing through the leafy canyon would sound like a speeding train. Cushnie went straight home and started hacking down brush near her house. "It was terror," she said. "Somehow before that, I never got it."

Ever since, she has been on a campaign to increase fire awareness in the canyon. For years she has chaired the fire committee, which promotes brush clearance and emergency readiness.

When the sundowners rage and it's 90 degrees at 11 p.m., Cushnie stays up, watching and sniffing the air. She keeps a fire hose and plastic jugs of retardant in a storage area.

"We've done a lot. But is it enough?" she asks. "I don't know."

In designing their home, Cushnie and her husband anticipated new state building codes intended to make all of a house's exterior inhospitable to flame and embers. But the standards apply only to new construction in fire hazard zones -- an estimated 35,000 homes a year.

"The larger problem of wildland fire is all the older homes in the state," said Ventura County Fire Chief Bob Roper.

Stewart, the former state forestry department official, said "the next logical step" is to require owners of existing homes to retrofit for fire, at least when they remodel. "People say it's expensive. But so is earthquake insurance." Homes are fuel. "There is actually more flammable material in a house per square yard than in a forest," said University of California, Los Angeles, climate dynamics professor Michael Ghil.

In many California neighborhoods, including parts of Mission Canyon, homes are so close together that a neighbor's bedroom or living room is within the 100-foot perimeter fire officials say should be cleared of flammable material.

Mission Canyon residents have gotten better about removing brush and low-growing trees in recent years, Cushnie said. But it's not hard to spot the makings of a bonfire in many yards.

Since studying Mission Canyon, Cova has switched the focus of his research. Barring a wildfire equivalent of Hurricane Katrina, he doesn't think politicians will place a building cap on the West's firetrap canyons.

"Who makes money if a house isn't built?" he asks. "Nobody."

Now he is studying community facilities where people can take shelter -- golf courses, public swimming pools and the like.

If he lived in one of those canyons -- and he concedes they are charming -- Cova said he would construct an underground bunker with water.

"My family and I would not get in our car and try to navigate the smoke and flames with bumper-to-bumper taillights," he said. "We would just calmly open up, just like they do in Tornado Alley -- open the trap door and head downstairs. Wait 20 minutes, maybe less, and come back and extinguish the embers around the home.

"They do it for other hazards. We did it for the Cold War."

Times staff writer Julie Cart contributed to this report.

Article views: 966  
User Rating: / 1
PoorBest 
Discuss (1 posts)
tecsup Aug 27 2008 03:22:30
This thread discusses the Content article: WILDFIRES: Life at nature's edge can be in harm's way

Revolutionary climate control project can reduce hurricanes, droughts and wildfires...Top scientists agree

Climatologists, biologists and physicists from all corners of the globe agree that U.S. based Gravitational Systems, L.L.C.'s revolutionary clean power climate control project INDRA will improve the lives of billions of people around the world.

Terraforming weather-significant deserts into arable land with evaporated seawater.

Mr.Henderson, director of research and development, explains that the INDRA project, a proposed network of specialized evaporation channels moving sea water from the oceans deep into deserts, will convert world deserts into biodiverse arable areas which promotes a more stable world and regional weather. Deserts which cover 1/3 of all dry land will be terraformed into productive land.

The INDRA systems will give mankind control of the weather, ending dangerous hurricanes, typhoons, tornadoes, and dry heat waves within a decade.

Vast rivers can be turned on and off in hours, and reservoirs and salt marshes drained or replenished in days.

The increased bio-mass of the terraformed deserts will begin to reverse both global warming and thermal sea level rise. UNFCCC cap and trade certification of the INDRA project will allow individuals and business to fund the plan through carbon offsets. The initial projects will be targeted north American, and north African deserts.


Become a member of the INDRA society and spread the concept of practical weather control.

Inquiry@gravitationalsystems.org
Gravitational Systems, L.L.C.
P.o.Box 2066
Washington, D.C. 20013
website: http://www.gravitationalsystems.org/INDRA
#389766


Discuss this article on the forums. (1 posts)
Generated in 0.18067 Seconds