|
Going to jail, Flix Club owner asks media to stop using mug shot |
|
|
|
Caleb Warnock - DAILY HERALD
|
|
Daniel Dean Thompson, the owner of the now-defunct Flix Club edited movie store, was sentenced on Friday to serve 44 days in jail and 119 days with an ankle monitor.
The sentence stems from an incident in which he and an employee were accused of paying two 14-year-old girls for oral sex.
As he heard the sentence, Thompson's hands, clasped behind his back, shook violently.
In an impromptu press conference held in the courthouse hallway after Friday's hearing, Thompson, 31, said he was shocked by the judge's decision to send him to jail.
"I don't want to go to jail," he said, teary-eyed, calling the sentence "severe." "I was surprised. But I also accept the judge's decision."
Thompson said he had never before had a chance to tell his side of the story. He said his co-defendant, Isaac R. Lifferth, was never a co-owner of the Flix Club, though Lifferth claimed to be, that the store was never a front for producing porn and that Thompson himself had never solicited anyone for sex.
"I never propositioned anyone for anything, contrary to every report. I am sorry because I failed in doing what is right," he said to reporters, his voice emotional. "I am going to jail, which is very difficult for me. If I could change what happened I would, but I can't."
Thompson then pleaded with reporters to never use his jail mug shot again. When asked why, he said because "it is a bad photo."
Thompson's attorney had asked that the entire sentence be served on an ankle monitor, foregoing any time in jail, saying his client had been with the girls for less than 60 seconds before deciding to leave because he felt what he was doing was wrong. The attorney, Mike Petro, said monitoring would allow his client to continue to have shared physical custody of his two sons and to continue to pay restitution of up to $1,000 a month.
But Judge David Mortensen of American Fork's 4th District Court said Thompson had asked the underage girls their age and that Thompson must have known he was getting into "dangerous territory."
In his press conference, Thompson said he had come to know Lifferth because "he was a boyfriend of my ex-wife's sister and he needed a job." Thompson said he hired Lifferth, who soon thereafter "began living vicariously through me. He told people he owned my cars and my company."
When he closed the company, Thompson said he left Lifferth in charge "to finish last minute business. He turned my office into his own personal private party pad."
When police searched the business, they found drugs and porn in Lifferth's desk, Thompson said. A keg of beer accompanied by a receipt for the beer in Lifferth's name was also found.
"I had no idea, but because I owned the place, it was automatically mine," Thompson said.
A search of Thompson's own house netted nothing, he said.
"I have become a recluse and my life was on hold until today," Thompson said. "People have asked me if I will bounce back from this. It will be difficult but I will try. Contrary to every news report, I genuinely love people and I have gotten a ton of support. It just happens to be from people who are not as boisterous."
Asked several times why he had become involved in the oral sex, Thompson said he would like to know himself.
"If I could answer that I would," he said. "It was a bad judgment call, not a deliberate act of malice. I found myself in a situation that within one minute I became uncomfortable with and left, and less than a minute destroys my life. ... Everyone makes mistakes. The only difference is that mine are published."
In July, Thompson pleaded no contest to reduced charges stemming from the oral sex incident. Thompson pleaded no contest to two counts of sexual battery, a class A misdemeanor. The charges were reduced from unlawful sexual activity with a minor, a third-degree felony. Prosecutors also agreed to drop a misdemeanor charge of patronizing a prostitute as part of the plea deal.
On Friday, Mortensen agreed there was no evidence that Thompson knew that the girls had been paid.
In June, Thompson's co-defendant, Lifferth, was sentenced after pleading guilty to two counts of unlawful sexual activity with a minor, one count of patronizing a prostitute and one count of possession of a controlled substance. Mortensen sentenced Lifferth to 270 days in jail and 36 months of probation.
Thompson and Lifferth were arrested in January after a 14-year-old girl told her mother that an older man paid her and a friend $20 for oral sex. According to Orem police, the two girls asked a friend if she knew anyone who would be willing to pay for sex, and the friend put them in contact with Lifferth, who paid them each for oral sex and later took them to the Flix Club store in Orem and paid them another $20 to perform oral sex on Thompson. Thompson told police that he asked the girls if they were 18, and they said yes.
When police searched the store, they also found dozens of pornographic movies, and the girls told police that Thompson told them that Flix Club was a front for producing pornography. |
Article views: 4,600
Discuss (141 posts)
| Just Reading
|
Sep 04 2008 13:40:30
Watchman wrote:
Blondie wrote:
Watchman wrote:
Blondie wrote:
Watchman wrote:
Watchman,
MellowYellow doesn't know me at all,
But I do find it funny that you think I'm Blondie
JR, I'm not saying you''re blondie it just seems that you could be blondie, but not to disagree or pick a fight!
I'm a linguist and contractor for Headquarters Marine Corps/Naval Command. Part of my work is in identifying messaging sources. Blondie appears to either be you or knows you personally outside of the message board, from the first person dialogue that I mentioned. That's just from a cursory look, but who knows. Do people on these boards have many accounts? I think it is pretty safe to say that it is true from a syntax standpoint- grammar, sentence structure, word usage, slips on 1st, 2nd, 3rd person, colloquial terminology and all the rest.
That is actually pretty common in warfare. Enemies will create the appearance that there are many people chatting back and forth, discussing plans and strategy, even arguing with each other, yet all the while it's just one or a few people with just one purpose, to throw the enemy off target and demoralize them. That strategy can be very effective at messing up the enemy, for which I am grateful. It give me a great job.
[bquote]Blondie wrote:[/b]
WOW!!!!!!!!!!!:huh:
I am not real huh??? I will tell my boss that and my family. I have never had two accounts or acted like I have. If you want literary content go read a book this is a forum and I was clear. Maybe it was your perfect brain that stopped you from understanding, I could care less about your critique.
Just Reading is NOT me, never has been or will be, does not have the same equipment. Jr and I are friends in different states off this forum.
Mellow Yellow is attacking JR and unless he knows all the details, and I mean EVERYTHING, he needs to mellow out and stop the attacks. If he has a REAL issue with JR/bigdaddy, I would hope he/she has enough guts to deal with it off this forum.
Personal attacks as mellow yellow made are not needed on this venue. Is that CLEAR enough for linguist as you are????
I'm not trying to pick a fight here, but it wouldn't be hard to go back through a bunch of posts and figure out who is who and who is not. Again, I'm not picking a fight here, but your response is far too aggressive and goes well beyond the norm in self defense and attack. The "facts" you state are not verifiable. You allude that you are female, but your syntax is male and your arguments are so close to JR that a reasonable person could conclude you are one and the same. But I'm not saying that!
Shakespeare was an amazing linguist and is often quoted here: "Me Thinks Thou Doth Protest Too Much." It was a dead give away back then too.
Again. I'm not saying you are JR and I'm not trying to pick a fight.
You are not even close, and my syntax is from an independent woman. Guess you never met one of those!!!!
I was not aggressive, the fact that mellow was stating what he/she considered facts is wrong. If mellow has a problem with JR do it off this forum. It was the the way he/she stated how they felt about all the charges and events they spoke of.
Yep, I checked again and I am totally woman, Proud to be one also..
Uhhh... yeah.... I don't think so. You don't come within a 1000 miles of a female syntax, But of course I could be wrong. No fight here.
I have pictures of her and her family and yes Watchman she is totally a woman
she's a good lookin Blonde with a real big husband and her sons are major league football big 
|
#391693 |
| Watchman
|
Sep 04 2008 17:29:33
Just Reading wrote:
Watchman wrote:
Blondie wrote:
Watchman wrote:
Blondie wrote:
Watchman wrote:
Watchman,
MellowYellow doesn't know me at all,
But I do find it funny that you think I'm Blondie
JR, I'm not saying you''re blondie it just seems that you could be blondie, but not to disagree or pick a fight!
I'm a linguist and contractor for Headquarters Marine Corps/Naval Command. Part of my work is in identifying messaging sources. Blondie appears to either be you or knows you personally outside of the message board, from the first person dialogue that I mentioned. That's just from a cursory look, but who knows. Do people on these boards have many accounts? I think it is pretty safe to say that it is true from a syntax standpoint- grammar, sentence structure, word usage, slips on 1st, 2nd, 3rd person, colloquial terminology and all the rest.
That is actually pretty common in warfare. Enemies will create the appearance that there are many people chatting back and forth, discussing plans and strategy, even arguing with each other, yet all the while it's just one or a few people with just one purpose, to throw the enemy off target and demoralize them. That strategy can be very effective at messing up the enemy, for which I am grateful. It give me a great job.
[bquote]Blondie wrote:[/b]
WOW!!!!!!!!!!!:huh:
I am not real huh??? I will tell my boss that and my family. I have never had two accounts or acted like I have. If you want literary content go read a book this is a forum and I was clear. Maybe it was your perfect brain that stopped you from understanding, I could care less about your critique.
Just Reading is NOT me, never has been or will be, does not have the same equipment. Jr and I are friends in different states off this forum.
Mellow Yellow is attacking JR and unless he knows all the details, and I mean EVERYTHING, he needs to mellow out and stop the attacks. If he has a REAL issue with JR/bigdaddy, I would hope he/she has enough guts to deal with it off this forum.
Personal attacks as mellow yellow made are not needed on this venue. Is that CLEAR enough for linguist as you are????
I'm not trying to pick a fight here, but it wouldn't be hard to go back through a bunch of posts and figure out who is who and who is not. Again, I'm not picking a fight here, but your response is far too aggressive and goes well beyond the norm in self defense and attack. The "facts" you state are not verifiable. You allude that you are female, but your syntax is male and your arguments are so close to JR that a reasonable person could conclude you are one and the same. But I'm not saying that!
Shakespeare was an amazing linguist and is often quoted here: "Me Thinks Thou Doth Protest Too Much." It was a dead give away back then too.
Again. I'm not saying you are JR and I'm not trying to pick a fight.
You are not even close, and my syntax is from an independent woman. Guess you never met one of those!!!!
I was not aggressive, the fact that mellow was stating what he/she considered facts is wrong. If mellow has a problem with JR do it off this forum. It was the the way he/she stated how they felt about all the charges and events they spoke of.
Yep, I checked again and I am totally woman, Proud to be one also..
Uhhh... yeah.... I don't think so. You don't come within a 1000 miles of a female syntax, But of course I could be wrong. No fight here.
I have pictures of her and her family and yes Watchman she is totally a woman
she's a good lookin Blonde with a real big husband and her sons are major league football big
Nuff said. You guys have convinced me.
|
#391744 |
| Jaye
|
Sep 04 2008 18:18:18
MGWorthen wrote:
Jaye wrote:
I see nothing errant in desiring strength, unity or purity MGW.
And there is little anyone can do to exclude anyone else from participating on this forum. One can choose to ignore another, or not to respond to another...but it has become increasingly apparent that this forum is not moderated, and that people have been getting away with increasingly disgusting behavior on this forum, in direct contradiction to the agreement we all made when we registered to participate.
I see your point, but in the definition- strength, unity and purity were in the negative in that they were supposed by the individual or group and intended to exclude others.
I agree that this forum is not moderated per the rules. I was shocked by JR's response to my first post and reported it and the language to the moderator and nothing was done. So if that's the kind of forum it's going to be, then I guess people will have at it. A few minutes of reading the comments shows that almost every discussion moves right off topic to either personal attacks and upping each other on "witty" replies or more Ad homeniem attacks, especially regarding the LDS church by disaffected people who are on a crusade to hurt the church and anger its members.
Don't forget all the foul language and ad homs made by 'those' claiming to be righteous defenders of the faith, while they engage in worse behavior than the very 'anti's' they claim are attacking the faith.
Just what do you suppose THEIR crusade is?
|
#391752 |
| Jaye
|
Sep 04 2008 18:31:21
WaynesWorld wrote:
Jaye wrote:
WaynesWorld wrote:
Jaye wrote:
WaynesWorld wrote:
Jaye wrote:
.....
If you post John's address on this forum, this is a breach of Herald policy. Do it Dubbs...and perhaps we'll finally be rid of you for good.I've tried explaining that all you got to do to get rid of Dubbs is to not read his posts (or now, the posts of his 15 dozen new monikers). Sir John tries to tell you the same. But no, it is too hard...it is a foolish rush of pride to put "Dubbs" down where you think he belongs. Leave him alone and he will have no one to talk to, Jaye. You and Wren are two of the worst offenders, and are a big reason he is still here.
I don't know sometimes, I don't think the forum wants him gone. And that's fine. Things are crazy and nuts here...whatever.
One more thing here 'Wayne'...do not presume to assign blame to either Wren or I for Dubb's continued presence on this forum.
If you would assign blame to anyone, 'Wayne'...assign it to Dubbs himself...andoverlooked the foul and offensive language Dubbs posts, if you want to take it a step further...I'd advise you to contact Randy Wright and ask him why the Herald has consistently and the pictures of morbidly obese naked people he posts, and the fact that he actively engaged in stalking behavior.One question, though, Jaye...You wrote,"...and perhaps we'll finally be rid of you for good."
What do you mean by that? Maybe it's just me, but it sounds like you'd rather not have Dubbs on the forum.
Then, I get called the facist even though it is you who used the fascist-type words, "breach of policy"?
I even tell Dubbs sincerely that this forum is "dry" without him and the idiot dubbs me the fascist!?!
When he was booted before there were very few forum posts. He keeps the forum going, I'm sorry to spell it out that way but that's the way it is.
Come to think of it, Hell...what did I do?
You don't like my "tone"? My tone??? Last time I heard that was from my mother in the 1980's when I was a teenager.
What gives, bro?.
1. What do I mean by my suggestion regarding contacting Randy Wright? I'll explain. This was in response to your accusation in which you opined that Wren and I were somehow responsible for Dubbs still being here.
No, I'm talking about what you wrote before you suggested that I contact RW, Jaye.
You wrote, (see it above), "Do it Dubbs...and perhaps we'll finally be rid of you for good."
That's the line I was referring to, Jaye. Not that I personally want Dubbs gone. Rather, I was suggesting to you the means to be rid of him because you first wrote that sentence: "Do it Dubbs...and perhaps we'll finally be rid of you for good."
If you didn't mean you would like him gone then this is an accident of communication, and I apologize to some extent.
I do apologize for using the term, "offenders" in either case. I can see today that that went too far. I'd be a little pissed at me too if I was you (or Wren) for that.
I'm not pissed off at all WW. I was a bit flummoxed by the sudden change of attitude I perceived in your comment. I had always thought we had a pretty good working relationship as far as discussions went on this forum.
As for Dubbs...I don't really care whether he remains as a participant on this forum or goes for good. I would simply like to see him leave off the ad homs and the foul and abusive language.
WW...many people have suggested that the best way to 'get rid of' a troll is to ignore their comments. This has been tried a number of times in the little over two years I've participated on this forum. And it has been my experience that the very people who have suggested shunning or ignoring trollish participants usually ended up responding to their taunts...some sooner than others.
And as I have explained in past remarks, I have my reasons for responding to Dubbs's comments. Especially those in which he misrepresents my comments, and my beliefs.
I hope that you'll respect that, and that we can continue to discuss the issues amicably.
|
#391753 |
| Jaye
|
Sep 04 2008 18:45:08
Watchman wrote:
Blondie wrote:
Watchman wrote:
Blondie wrote:
Watchman wrote:
Watchman,
MellowYellow doesn't know me at all,
But I do find it funny that you think I'm Blondie
JR, I'm not saying you''re blondie it just seems that you could be blondie, but not to disagree or pick a fight!
I'm a linguist and contractor for Headquarters Marine Corps/Naval Command. Part of my work is in identifying messaging sources. Blondie appears to either be you or knows you personally outside of the message board, from the first person dialogue that I mentioned. That's just from a cursory look, but who knows. Do people on these boards have many accounts? I think it is pretty safe to say that it is true from a syntax standpoint- grammar, sentence structure, word usage, slips on 1st, 2nd, 3rd person, colloquial terminology and all the rest.
That is actually pretty common in warfare. Enemies will create the appearance that there are many people chatting back and forth, discussing plans and strategy, even arguing with each other, yet all the while it's just one or a few people with just one purpose, to throw the enemy off target and demoralize them. That strategy can be very effective at messing up the enemy, for which I am grateful. It give me a great job.
[bquote]Blondie wrote:[/b]
WOW!!!!!!!!!!!:huh:
I am not real huh??? I will tell my boss that and my family. I have never had two accounts or acted like I have. If you want literary content go read a book this is a forum and I was clear. Maybe it was your perfect brain that stopped you from understanding, I could care less about your critique.
Just Reading is NOT me, never has been or will be, does not have the same equipment. Jr and I are friends in different states off this forum.
Mellow Yellow is attacking JR and unless he knows all the details, and I mean EVERYTHING, he needs to mellow out and stop the attacks. If he has a REAL issue with JR/bigdaddy, I would hope he/she has enough guts to deal with it off this forum.
Personal attacks as mellow yellow made are not needed on this venue. Is that CLEAR enough for linguist as you are????
I'm not trying to pick a fight here, but it wouldn't be hard to go back through a bunch of posts and figure out who is who and who is not. Again, I'm not picking a fight here, but your response is far too aggressive and goes well beyond the norm in self defense and attack. The "facts" you state are not verifiable. You allude that you are female, but your syntax is male and your arguments are so close to JR that a reasonable person could conclude you are one and the same. But I'm not saying that!
Shakespeare was an amazing linguist and is often quoted here: "Me Thinks Thou Doth Protest Too Much." It was a dead give away back then too.
Again. I'm not saying you are JR and I'm not trying to pick a fight.
You are not even close, and my syntax is from an independent woman. Guess you never met one of those!!!!
I was not aggressive, the fact that mellow was stating what he/she considered facts is wrong. If mellow has a problem with JR do it off this forum. It was the the way he/she stated how they felt about all the charges and events they spoke of.
Yep, I checked again and I am totally woman, Proud to be one also..
Uhhh... yeah.... I don't think so. You don't come within a 1000 miles of a female syntax, But of course I could be wrong. No fight here.
'Female syntax'? Interesting notion. There are languages in which gender applies to the rules of syntax. English is not one of them.
So...you think Blondie is a male by the way she writes, and the syntax she uses? By strange coincidence...when I first started participating on this forum, a number of participants were convinced that I was a woman...by 'the way I talked'.
I am not a female...I am a male...have been since day one.
|
#391756 |
There are too many comments to list them all here. See the forum for the full discussion.Discuss this article on the forums. (141 posts)
|