Friday, 10 October 2008
N.M. governor blasts Chaffetz on immigration Print E-mail
Joe Pyrah - Daily Herald   

Jason Chaffetz clearly has someone's attention.

The Republican candidate for Utah's 3rd District U.S. House seat was lambasted by New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson on Thursday for his so-called "tent city" stance regarding illegal immigrants. Chaffetz has said previously that the 600,000 fugitive immigrants should be put in tents surrounded by barb wire, and it wasn't the first time his immigration plan has been attacked by those outside the state.

"Mr. Chaffetz's immigration proposal is offensive and inhumane and should be rejected out of hand. His statements do nothing more than add more of the same divisive political rhetoric that incites confrontation and does not solve the problem," Richardson's statement read in part. Richardson briefly ran for president, has been a U.S. Representative, ambassador to the United Nations and was the U.S. Secretary of Energy.

Last month, Rep. Mike Honda, D-Calif., said the plan is reminiscent of the WWII Japanese internment camps in which a group of people was singled out ethnically and rounded up.

An exasperated Chaffetz said Thursday that his plan has been misunderstood or deliberately misconstrued.

"I want to enforce the law. And I'm sure that far-left, liberal Democrats like Bill Richardson and Bennion Spencer don't like it," he said. Spencer is one of Chaffetz's opponents in the 3rd District. "I've never said I want to round up people based on their ethnicity and throw them in a tent."

He did say Thursday that he could have used a better word than "tent." His former boss, Gov. Jon Huntsman Jr., told the Salt Lake Tribune 10 days ago that "on its face it's an extreme idea."

"I can do better calling them eco-friendly, highly portable, low-cost detention facilities," Chaffetz said. He now points to structures like those built by Utah company Sprung Instant Structures as a model. "You don't go down to Cabela's to get these things."

Chaffetz said he isn't the first to use the idea, either. States including Hawaii and Idaho already use similar facilities.

"I'm admitting that 'tent' is sensational," he said. "I can do a better job of articulating what these structures are."

The entire tent city idea is but one part of his plan, Chaffetz says. Indeed, other parts of Richardson's comments echo the Utah Republican's proposals.

"We can have a policy that helps secure our borders while dealing in a responsible and humane way with immigrants who break our laws," Richardson said. "At the same time we must also resolve the status of the 12 million undocumented immigrants already here so they can become legal, productive members of our society if they learn English, follow our laws, pay fines and get in line for a path to citizenship.

Chaffetz said it's easy for out-of-state opponents to criticize, but that if he could convince Richardson of the validity of his plan.

"My guess is if we sat and talked it through, we'd be fine," he said.

On Thursday, Chaffetz took particular exception to Spencer, who has said Chaffetz wants to put people in the tent cities based on ethnicity.

"I've never even come close to suggesting that," he said.

In a statement released Thursday night, Spencer disagreed, saying that Chaffetz has injected race into the immigration issue. "For Jason [Chaffetz] to state that his immigration proposal of imprisoning undocumented immigrants into tent cities surrounded with barbed wire has nothing to do with race is entirely disingenuous and dangerous as it would incite resentment against ethnic minorities and lead to racial profiling. We need a firm, yet responsible immigration policy that protects our borders while showing compassion and tolerance towards immigrants."

Article views: 2,073  
User Rating: / 10
PoorBest 
Discuss (39 posts)
arc1 Oct 11 2008 13:28:09
Interesting to read some of the comments..

There are supporters of both sides that are much more restrictive than Jason Chaffetz is.

Jason is more a voice of reason compared to:

There are people that want to round up all 12 million illegals, and are mad that Jason DOESN'T want to do that. Jason only wanted facilities where the government wouldn't have to catch and release felons. There are 600,000 they have let go. We wouldn't have to build facilities for that many, as we just need a temporary facility for convicted criminals, to be held prior to deportation.

There are people that don't want anyone new moving in, where Jason wants to fix LEGAL immigration so it doesn't take so long to legally come here.

There are people that think providing any temporary worker visa is wrong, where Jason agrees it is a great way to bring people out of the shadows, get rid of the fake IDs, but this in NO WAY provides a pathway to citizenship in front of those wanting to immigrate who have followed the rules.

Those that are blasting Jason Chaffetz, should not be, as he is a voice of reason and is not promoting the ideas he is accused of.
#399603
arc1 Oct 11 2008 13:34:48
It is time people go back to what Jason said, and not what his opponent or La Raza or the media says he is saying. Jason has stated he is for the following:

FIX LEGAL IMMIGRATION

REJECT AMNESTY

LOCK DOWN THE BORDER, ENFORCE VISAS

HAVE THE POLITICAL WILL TO ENFORCE THE CURRENT LAWS

GET RID OF REWARDS & INCENTIVES TO BE HERE ILLEGALLY

GIVE BUSINESS THE TOOLS & ALIGN FINANCIAL INCENTIVES

INSIST ON ASSIMILATION
#399604
WatchDog Oct 11 2008 14:56:40
arc1 wrote:
It is time people go back to what Jason said, and not what his opponent or La Raza or the media says he is saying. Jason has stated he is for the following:

FIX LEGAL IMMIGRATION

REJECT AMNESTY

LOCK DOWN THE BORDER, ENFORCE VISAS

HAVE THE POLITICAL WILL TO ENFORCE THE CURRENT LAWS

GET RID OF REWARDS & INCENTIVES TO BE HERE ILLEGALLY

GIVE BUSINESS THE TOOLS & ALIGN FINANCIAL INCENTIVES

INSIST ON ASSIMILATION


AND, in the meantime, follow the rule of law instead of ignoring it as Richardson does. He probably won't get a MALDEF or LaRaza award like Cannon did, but then Cannon's award was a good part of his undoing.

Maybe Jason will actually follow the dictates of his constituents. 85% of them want illegal immigration ended.

What a pleasant change that would be!
#399609
The Keeper Oct 11 2008 17:16:42
WatchDog wrote:
arc1 wrote:
It is time people go back to what Jason said, and not what his opponent or La Raza or the media says he is saying. Jason has stated he is for the following:

FIX LEGAL IMMIGRATION

REJECT AMNESTY

LOCK DOWN THE BORDER, ENFORCE VISAS

HAVE THE POLITICAL WILL TO ENFORCE THE CURRENT LAWS

GET RID OF REWARDS & INCENTIVES TO BE HERE ILLEGALLY

GIVE BUSINESS THE TOOLS & ALIGN FINANCIAL INCENTIVES

INSIST ON ASSIMILATION


AND, in the meantime, follow the rule of law instead of ignoring it as Richardson does. He probably won't get a MALDEF or LaRaza award like Cannon did, but then Cannon's award was a good part of his undoing.

Maybe Jason will actually follow the dictates of his constituents. 85% of them want illegal immigration ended.

What a pleasant change that would be!


Both Barack Hussein Obama, a/k/a Barry Soetoro, and Juan McCain are promising amnesty in the first 100 days.
#399663
madnessjm Oct 13 2008 17:20:23
This is important to realize. Chaffetz is working towards a solution that the people want. He is taking a hard stance, and knows that it is temporary because he is also working on fixing the immigration problem by stream lining the process to allow immigrants into the country. But there are many that come into the country, not to work, but to commit crimes. These are the ones that Jason wants in the tent cities because it eliminates costs, and serves the temporary situation.
#400109
There are too many comments to list them all here. See the forum for the full discussion.

Discuss this article on the forums. (39 posts)
Generated in 0.11766 Seconds