Tuesday, 14 October 2008
Ohio executes inmate who argued was too fat to die Print E-mail
Matt Reed - The Associated Press   
LUCASVILLE, Ohio — Ohio executed a 5-foot-7, 267-pound double murderer on Tuesday who argued his obesity made death by lethal injection inhumane.

Richard Cooey, 41, died at 10:28 a.m. at the Southern Ohio Correctional Facility in Lucasville, said Jim Gravelle, a spokesman with state attorney general’s office.

There were no immediate reports of difficulties finding suitable veins to deliver the deadly chemicals, a problem that has delayed previous executions in the state.

Cooey’s attorneys had argued that his weight problem would make it difficult for prison staff to access a vein. A prisons spokeswoman said Cooey received a pre-execution exam early Tuesday and was cleared.

Cooey, who killed two University of Akron students in 1986, walked into the death chamber at 10:15 a.m. wearing gray pants and was strapped onto the gurney.

“You (expletive) haven’t paid any attention to anything I’ve said in the last 22 1/2 years, why would anyone pay any attention to anything I’ve had to say now,” Cooey said looking at the ceiling. He made no other comment.

Cooey tapped the fingers of his left hand several times before he died and his face took on a purple shade.

Six family members of one of his victims watched the execution. Summit County Prosecutor Sherri Bevan Walsh said the family was disappointed that Cooey was vulgar and hateful at the end.

He was the first inmate executed in Ohio in more than a year, and the state’s first since the end of the unofficial moratorium on executions that began last year while the U.S. Supreme Court reviewed Kentucky’s lethal injection procedure.

Cooey lost a final appeal earlier Tuesday when the U.S. Supreme Court turned down without comment his complaint that the state’s protocol for lethal injection could cause an agonizing and painful death. He wanted the state to use a single drug rather than a three-drug combination, and asked for a stay of execution pending a hearing on that motion.

The court on Monday denied a separate appeal based on Cooey’s claim that his obesity was a bar to humane lethal injection. The argument also had been rejected by a federal appeals court in Cincinnati and the Ohio Supreme Court, with both courts ruling that he missed a deadline for filing appeals.

Cooey is 75 pounds heavier than when he went to death row — the result of prison food and 23-hour-a-day confinement, his lawyers said.

They also argued that a migraine medicine prescribed by a prison physician could reduce the effect of the anesthetic used as part of the three-drug lethal injection.

They claimed that Ohio has a history of botched executions.

The last Ohio inmate to be executed was Christopher Newton — who was similar in size to Cooey — in May 2007. The execution team had trouble putting IVs in his arm, which delayed his execution nearly two hours. There were similar problems in the execution of another inmate in 2006.

Cooey made an earlier trip to the death house. But a U.S. District Court judge intervened hours before his scheduled execution in

July 2003 when the Ohio Public Defender’s office said it needed more time to assess the case after an appeals court dismissed his previous attorneys for inadequate representation.

Cooey and a co-defendant were convicted in the sexual assaults and slayings of University of Akron students Dawn McCreery, 20, and Wendy Offredo, 21, in September 1986. His co-defendant was 17 and was sentenced to life in prison because of his age.

The state has now executed 27 inmates since 1999, when Ohio renewed executions after more than three decades.

Article views: 1,059  
User Rating: / 2
PoorBest 
Discuss (4 posts)
what goes around Oct 14 2008 17:19:57
This thread discusses the Content article: Ohio executes inmate who argued was too fat to die

"double murderer on Tuesday argued his obesity made death by lethal injection inhumane".

Pleassssse. He murdered two people - I'm sure their deaths weren't as humane as his was. Sad to hear he was so unrepentant up to the very end.
#400495
EHBIV Oct 14 2008 20:21:36
All of us will eventually get our just rewards.

I suspect he'll be in more trouble for what he did than the people that sent him to meet his maker will be, but that's just me.

Wonder how much it cost to let him stick around, file all his appeals, eat all that food, etc.? Oh, well, at least we can be (reasonably) assured that an innocent guy was not executed incorrectly.
#400533
what goes around Oct 14 2008 21:32:45
EHBIV wrote:
All of us will eventually get our just rewards.

I suspect he'll be in more trouble for what he did than the people that sent him to meet his maker will be, but that's just me.

Wonder how much it cost to let him stick around, file all his appeals, eat all that food, etc.? Oh, well, at least we can be (reasonably) assured that an innocent guy was not executed incorrectly.



You can be sure the cost of his being 22 years on death row (plus appeals) were 10 x's what it would have cost to incarcerate him for life. I am not a fan of the death penalty because of what you alluded to - there are documentated cases of innocent people being exceuted.

About who is and isn't "in trouble". It is kind of in the same catigory of going to war. Is a person damned for killing someone when that is what is expected? It seems reasonable that since the first law was "an eye for an eye" that some killing is justified. But hey, what do I know - not much.
#400559
RunningMan Oct 16 2008 01:43:43
Actually, this brings up a good point. He gained 75 pounds on prison diet. WOW! What we need to do is put everyone on death row on a Twinkie-only diet, supplemented with soft drinks and potato chips.

Their early demise would save the taxpayers a great deal of money!
#400908


Discuss this article on the forums. (4 posts)
Generated in 0.10817 Seconds