Tuesday, 14 October 2008
Utah foreclosure auction flops Print E-mail
Grace Leong - DAILY HERALD   

An auction that netted $7.5 million in bids on 56 distressed Utah properties fell through last week after the owners -- three banks and two private lenders -- decided they may get a better deal by holding out for the government's bailout plan.

"There were buyers, but we couldn't sell the homes because free enterprise has gone out of the market," said Eric Nelson, founder of Las Vegas-based Eric Nelson Auctioneering.

 

His company on Sept. 30 put up for sale 56 foreclosed properties and lots, most of which are in Utah County.

The auction, held in Salt Lake City, attracted thousands, including 200 bidders who bid between $275,000 and $615,000 for 10 luxury homes in Midway and Murray that were appraised at between $525,000 and $652,000. They bid between $26,000 and $100,000 for 44 custom lots in Mapleton, Elk Ridge, Lehi, Alpine, Ogden, West Haven and Willard that were valued between $112,000 and $290,000 a piece.

The most-expensive properties on the auction block included a $1.2 million unfinished home in Draper, which attracted the highest bid at $615,000, while a 62-acre parcel in Park City that's valued at $3.5 million, snagged the highest bid at $1.125 million, said Eric Taylor Nelson, the company founder's nephew.

But all those bids were rejected late last week, a move Eric Nelson Auctioneering's founder blames on "indecision" among lenders caused by the government's proposed bailout plan.

Most of the Utah County properties are owned by lending institutions including Centennial Bank Inc., Proficio Bank of Salt Lake City, and Apex Investment Group LLC, according to Utah County land records.

"This has never happened before. In the 25 years we've conducted lender-owned auctions, we've consistently closed over 95 percent of all high bids," Nelson said.

"The stock market's historic drop last week and the bailout plan are some of the main reasons why the lenders rejected the bids," he said. "They're thinking, 'Why sell the properties for 50 cents on the dollar when they may get 75 cents or 80 cents through the bailout?' "

"If buyers aren't allowed to buy, that delays the process even more," Nelson said. "That's not a good thing to have when you're trying to get the economy back on track. It's disheartening for buyers and sellers and it has a real economic impact with thousands and thousands of homes coming on the market."

Representatives with Centennial, Proficio and Apex could not immediately be reached for comment on Monday.

Kelly Matthews, executive vice president and senior economist with Wells Fargo, said he doesn't believe there's any "clear-cut evidence or serious discussions over whether the government will buy those foreclosed properties."

"The initial proposal is that the government may buy mortgage-backed securities which could possibly include properties that were already foreclosed on," Matthews said. "But I don't believe there's any clear-cut evidence or defined program that the [U.S.] Treasury is going to buy those foreclosed homes."

The U.S. government is expected to buy stakes in the nation's top financial institutions in an effort to restore confidence to the battered banking system. The plan is designed to bolster bank balance sheets by providing new capital and removing rotten assets. All of it is designed to get money flowing through the system so that banks will lend to companies, consumers and each other.

Nonetheless, Nelson said he believes the lenders are in a difficult position because of the sharp plunge in residential real estate market values.

Based on the auction's highest bids, the lenders will only recover, at best, about 60 cents on the dollar for their properties' outstanding loan value, he said.

"I think the sellers were surprised that the lot prices came in so low. One of the sellers walked out in the middle of the auction on his lots. He paid about $231,000 for each of his lots, but they were getting $100,000-plus bids," he said. "Most of the bidders at the auction were investors, who typically pay less than those buying to build homes on the lots."

Steve Cuillard, owner of Affiliated Realty in Orem and a broker specializing in foreclosure sales, said he hasn't received any indications that the lenders he works with are holding off on sales on expectations of a government bailout.

If anything, he said foreclosure sales are slow because it's increasingly harder for people to get financing for a variety of reasons. "More lenders are now requiring 10 percent to 20 percent down payment, instead of 3 to 5 percent. I've had two potential buyers bail out on me this week because one of them had to take a pay cut, and another one was told his employer was cutting back," he said.

Article views: 4,496  
User Rating: / 7
PoorBest 
Discuss (11 posts)
The Keeper Oct 14 2008 19:08:27
Sir John the Apostate wrote:
Ever get the feeling that Bush and Chaney are, giving us the finger on their way out the door?



That's how veterans feel about Clinton.
#400514

Sir John the Apostate
Oct 14 2008 22:53:01
The Keeper wrote:
Sir John the Apostate wrote:
Ever get the feeling that Bush and Chaney are, giving us the finger on their way out the door?



That's how veterans feel about Clinton.


I'm a veteran and, I don't feel that way.

By the way didn't he leave us with a surplus?
#400590
The Keeper Oct 14 2008 22:59:31
Sir John the Apostate wrote:
The Keeper wrote:
Sir John the Apostate wrote:
Ever get the feeling that Bush and Chaney are, giving us the finger on their way out the door?



That's how veterans feel about Clinton.


I'm a veteran and, I don't feel that way.

By the way didn't he leave us with a surplus?


If you call Clinton trading IOUs for cash out of the Social Security till, then one might stretch the definition of "surplus". And that's if you don't mind paying taxes again to redeem those IOUs.
#400597
Jane85 Oct 15 2008 08:25:53
thereitis wrote:
The Feds/Treasury (two headed monster right now) are buying up Prefered shares in banks (as opposed to regular shares) in order to shore up leverages.

Many people have heard of fractional banking. It is the notion that if a bank has $1 in reserve they can lend out $9. Or if you like, if they have $1 in reserve they can lend out $0.90. Either case, they only have to keep 10% of the loaned amount on reserve.

We have addressed the Democrats sin of doing the world class pathetic Community Reinvestment Act and ACORN, in creating the housing part of the bubble.

The Wall Street part of the bubble was caused by Republicans, when they changed the fraction rate to 2.5%, from 10%!

Think about that. You only need to have two and a half pennys per dollar of loans. And when these loans were bundled on the secondary market, all it took is an incredibly small drop in housing prices (2.5% drop in housing prices) and the entire bundle has entered the nexus of the universe. In reality you have a bundle of house worth a lot of money. Since the 2.5% has been eaten up by housing depreciation, you have a bundle of junk bonds, essentially.

By lending money via Preferred stock the US Treasury is rebuilding the 2.5% base. It might work.

Arc and I do agree in one area (finally, Chaffetz aside) and that is the problem of banks holding onto their foreclosed properties.

This is identical to what happened with Socialized "Romney-care" healthcare in Massachusetts.

As soon as a better alternative was available from the government institutions/families dumped the free market.

Why in the world should a bank sell a foreclosed property on the free market when they can hold out and get two or three times the money from the government (taxpayers)? Of course they aren't going to. This get's into "Mark to Market" rules.

When you consider that the free market way of dealing with this is having banks sell these properties to free market at pennys on the dollar; and the Fed/Treasury now buying them at a much higher price. We are seeing a massive shift in ownership and wealth.

We the People are now in direct competition with the government for ownership. Now to hope that they get out of the realestate business and get back to running education. Wait, maybe that's not the best idea either. Maybe they should get back to running health care. Crud, maybe not their either.

At least they know how to run the military.


I agree that this government bailout business is getting way out of hand. I find this article very disturbing. This kind of thing just confirms my fear that we are on the road to socialism!
#400694
Jane85 Oct 15 2008 08:28:50
Sir John the Apostate wrote:
Ever get the feeling that Bush and Chaney are, giving us the finger on their way out the door?



Bush and Cheney aren't the only ones mixed up in this mess. These bailouts are bi-partisan as are the origins of the financial problems we're facing now.

Kudos to the congressmen who had the courage to vote "nay".
#400695
There are too many comments to list them all here. See the forum for the full discussion.

Discuss this article on the forums. (11 posts)
Office Administrative Support Mentoring of America LLC
Psych Tech part time and on call Center for Change
Insurance Farm Bureau Financial Services
Military Docupak
Newspaper Delivery Person The Daily Herald- classifieds/employee ads
Inbound Technical Support $10.50/hr Teleperformance

See All Top Jobs Post your job
Orem - Move In & Real Estate Provo/Orem
Land Bargains! 30% DISCOUNT Through Recreational Property
Provo- Legal brick duplex, Close Duplexes for Sale
Lehi Condo! $142,000! Better than Real Estate North County
ALPINE- Spectacular Views!! Beautiful 6bed Real Estate North County
Orem NE Great Location!! 2200sf! Real Estate Provo/Orem

See all Top Homes List your property
Generated in 1.91596 Seconds